Ductal variant prostate carcinoma is associated with a significantly shorter metastasis-free survival.


Journal

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2021
Historique:
received: 03 09 2020
revised: 09 12 2020
accepted: 19 12 2020
pubmed: 9 3 2021
medline: 26 10 2021
entrez: 8 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Ductal adenocarcinoma is an uncommon prostate cancer variant. Previous studies suggest that ductal variant histology may be associated with worse clinical outcomes, but these are difficult to interpret. To address this, we performed an international, multi-institutional study to describe the characteristics of ductal adenocarcinoma, particularly focussing on the effect of presence of ductal variant cancer on metastasis-free survival. Patients with ductal variant histology from two institutional databases who underwent radical prostatectomies were identified and compared with an independent acinar adenocarcinoma cohort. After propensity score matching, the effect of the presence of ductal adenocarcinoma on time to biochemical recurrence, initiation of salvage therapy and the development of metastatic disease was determined. Deep whole-exome sequencing was performed for selected cases (n = 8). A total of 202 ductal adenocarcinoma and 2037 acinar adenocarcinoma cases were analysed. Survival analysis after matching demonstrated that patients with ductal variant histology had shorter salvage-free survival (8.1 versus 22.0 months, p = 0.03) and metastasis-free survival (6.7 versus 78.6 months, p < 0.0001). Ductal variant histology was consistently associated with RB1 loss, as well as copy number gains in TAP1, SLC4A2 and EHHADH. The presence of any ductal variant adenocarcinoma at the time of prostatectomy portends a worse clinical outcome than pure acinar cancers, with significantly shorter times to initiation of salvage therapies and the onset of metastatic disease. These features appear to be driven by uncoupling of chromosomal duplication from cell division, resulting in widespread copy number aberration with specific gain of genes implicated in treatment resistance.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Ductal adenocarcinoma is an uncommon prostate cancer variant. Previous studies suggest that ductal variant histology may be associated with worse clinical outcomes, but these are difficult to interpret. To address this, we performed an international, multi-institutional study to describe the characteristics of ductal adenocarcinoma, particularly focussing on the effect of presence of ductal variant cancer on metastasis-free survival.
METHODS
Patients with ductal variant histology from two institutional databases who underwent radical prostatectomies were identified and compared with an independent acinar adenocarcinoma cohort. After propensity score matching, the effect of the presence of ductal adenocarcinoma on time to biochemical recurrence, initiation of salvage therapy and the development of metastatic disease was determined. Deep whole-exome sequencing was performed for selected cases (n = 8).
RESULTS
A total of 202 ductal adenocarcinoma and 2037 acinar adenocarcinoma cases were analysed. Survival analysis after matching demonstrated that patients with ductal variant histology had shorter salvage-free survival (8.1 versus 22.0 months, p = 0.03) and metastasis-free survival (6.7 versus 78.6 months, p < 0.0001). Ductal variant histology was consistently associated with RB1 loss, as well as copy number gains in TAP1, SLC4A2 and EHHADH.
CONCLUSIONS
The presence of any ductal variant adenocarcinoma at the time of prostatectomy portends a worse clinical outcome than pure acinar cancers, with significantly shorter times to initiation of salvage therapies and the onset of metastatic disease. These features appear to be driven by uncoupling of chromosomal duplication from cell division, resulting in widespread copy number aberration with specific gain of genes implicated in treatment resistance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33678516
pii: S0959-8049(21)00017-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.12.030
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

440-450

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C57899/A25812
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Ken Chow (K)

Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: ken.chow@me.com.

Justin Bedő (J)

Bioinformatics Division, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Andrew Ryan (A)

TissuPath Specialist Pathology, Mount Waverley, Victoria, Australia.

Dinesh Agarwal (D)

Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Urology, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australia.

Damien Bolton (D)

Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Yee Chan (Y)

Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Philip Dundee (P)

Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Urology, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australia.

Mark Frydenberg (M)

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.

Marc A Furrer (MA)

Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Jeremy Goad (J)

Genitourinary Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Urology, St Vincent's Health, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.

Dennis Gyomber (D)

Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Uri Hanegbi (U)

Department of Urology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Laurence Harewood (L)

Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Dennis King (D)

Department of Urology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Alastair D Lamb (AD)

Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Nathan Lawrentschuk (N)

Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Genitourinary Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Peter Liodakis (P)

Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Daniel Moon (D)

Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Genitourinary Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Declan G Murphy (DG)

Genitourinary Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Justin S Peters (JS)

Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Paul Ruljancich (P)

Epworth Eastern, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.

Clare L Verrill (CL)

Department of Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.

David Webb (D)

Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Lih-Ming Wong (LM)

Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Urology, St Vincent's Health, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.

Homayoun Zargar (H)

Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Urology, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australia.

Anthony J Costello (AJ)

Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Australian Prostate Centre, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Anthony T Papenfuss (AT)

Bioinformatics Division, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Christopher M Hovens (CM)

Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Niall M Corcoran (NM)

Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Urology, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH