Ventricular activation pattern assessment during right ventricular pacing: Ultra-high-frequency ECG study.


Journal

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2021
Historique:
revised: 14 02 2021
received: 26 11 2020
accepted: 22 02 2021
pubmed: 9 3 2021
medline: 11 8 2021
entrez: 8 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Right ventricular (RV) pacing causes delayed activation of remote ventricular segments. We used the ultra-high-frequency ECG (UHF-ECG) to describe ventricular depolarization when pacing different RV locations. In 51 patients, temporary pacing was performed at the RV septum (mSp); further subclassified as right ventricular inflow tract (RVIT) and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) for septal inflow and outflow positions (below or above the plane of His bundle in right anterior oblique), apex, anterior lateral wall, and at the basal RV septum with nonselective His bundle or RBB capture (nsHBorRBBp). The timings of UHF-ECG electrical activations were quantified as left ventricular lateral wall delay (LVLWd; V8 activation delay) and RV lateral wall delay (RVLWd; V1 activation delay). The LVLWd was shortest for nsHBorRBBp (11 ms [95% confidence interval = 5-17]), followed by the RVIT (19 ms [11-26]) and the RVOT (33 ms [27-40]; p < .01 between all of them), although the QRSd for the latter two were the same (153 ms (148-158) vs. 153 ms (148-158); p = .99). RV apical capture not only had a longer LVLWd (34 ms (26-43) compared to mSp (27 ms (20-34), p < .05), but its RVLWd (17 ms (9-25) was also the longest compared to other RV pacing sites (mean values for nsHBorRBBp, mSp, anterior and lateral wall captures being below 6 ms), p < .001 compared to each of them. RVIT pacing produces better ventricular synchrony compared to other RV pacing locations with myocardial capture. However, UHF-ECG ventricular dysynchrony seen during RVIT pacing is increased compared to concomitant capture of basal septal myocytes and His bundle or proximal right bundle branch.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Right ventricular (RV) pacing causes delayed activation of remote ventricular segments. We used the ultra-high-frequency ECG (UHF-ECG) to describe ventricular depolarization when pacing different RV locations.
METHODS
In 51 patients, temporary pacing was performed at the RV septum (mSp); further subclassified as right ventricular inflow tract (RVIT) and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) for septal inflow and outflow positions (below or above the plane of His bundle in right anterior oblique), apex, anterior lateral wall, and at the basal RV septum with nonselective His bundle or RBB capture (nsHBorRBBp). The timings of UHF-ECG electrical activations were quantified as left ventricular lateral wall delay (LVLWd; V8 activation delay) and RV lateral wall delay (RVLWd; V1 activation delay).
RESULTS
The LVLWd was shortest for nsHBorRBBp (11 ms [95% confidence interval = 5-17]), followed by the RVIT (19 ms [11-26]) and the RVOT (33 ms [27-40]; p < .01 between all of them), although the QRSd for the latter two were the same (153 ms (148-158) vs. 153 ms (148-158); p = .99). RV apical capture not only had a longer LVLWd (34 ms (26-43) compared to mSp (27 ms (20-34), p < .05), but its RVLWd (17 ms (9-25) was also the longest compared to other RV pacing sites (mean values for nsHBorRBBp, mSp, anterior and lateral wall captures being below 6 ms), p < .001 compared to each of them.
CONCLUSION
RVIT pacing produces better ventricular synchrony compared to other RV pacing locations with myocardial capture. However, UHF-ECG ventricular dysynchrony seen during RVIT pacing is increased compared to concomitant capture of basal septal myocytes and His bundle or proximal right bundle branch.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33682277
doi: 10.1111/jce.14985
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1385-1394

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Sweeney MO, Prinzen FW. A new paradigm for physiologic ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(2):282-288.
Kaye GC, Linker NJ, Marwick TH, et al. Protect-Pace trial i: effect of right ventricular pacing lead site on left ventricular function in patients with high-grade atrioventricular block: results of the Protect-Pace study. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(14):856-862.
Domenichini G, Sunthorn H, Fleury E, Foulkes H, Stettler C, Burri H. Pacing of the interventricular septum versus the right ventricular apex: a prospective, randomized study. Eur J Intern Med. 2012;23(7):621-627.
Abdelrahman M, Subzposh FA, Beer D, et al. Clinical outcomes of His bundle pacing compared to right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(20):2319-2330.
Keene D, Arnold AD, Jastrzębski M, et al. His bundle pacing, learning curve, procedure characteristics, safety, and feasibility: insights from a large international observational study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(10):1984-1993.
Su L, Wu S, Wang S, et al. Pacing parameters and success rates of permanent His-bundle pacing in patients with narrow QRS: a single-centre experience. Europace. 2019;21(5):763-770.
Bednarek A, Ionita O, Moskal P, et al. Nonselective versus selective His bundle pacing: an acute intrapatient speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021;32(1):117-125.
Jurak P, Curila K, Leinveber P, et al. Novel ultra-high-frequency electrocardiogram tool for the description of the ventricular depolarization pattern before and during cardiac resynchronization. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(1):300-307.
Jurak P, Bear L, Nguyen U. 3-Dimensional ventricular electrical activation pattern assessed from a novel high-frequency electrocardiographic imaging technique: principles and clinical importance. Res Sq. 2020. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3rs-133316/v1
Curila K, Prochazkova R, Jurak P, et al. Both selective and nonselective His bundle, but not myocardial, pacing preserve ventricular electrical synchrony assessed by ultra-high-frequency ECG. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(4):607-614.
Plesinger F, Jurak P, Halamek J, et al. Ventricular electrical delay measured from body surface ECGs is associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy response in left bundle branch block patients from the MADIT-CRT trial (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11(5):e005719.
Devabhaktuni S, Mar PL, Shirazi J, Dandamudi G. How to perform His bundle pacing: tools and techniques. Cardiac Electrophysiol Clin. 2018;10(3):495-502.
Schwaab B, Kindermann M, Frohlig G, Berg M, Kusch O, Schieffer H. Septal lead implantation for the reduction of paced QRS duration using passive-fixation leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001;24(1):28-33.
Burri H, Park CI, Zimmermann M, et al. Utility of the surface electrocardiogram for confirming right ventricular septal pacing: validation using electroanatomical mapping. Europace. 2011;13(1):82-86.
Osmancik P, Stros P, Herman D, Curila K, Petr R. The insufficiency of left anterior oblique and the usefulness of right anterior oblique projection for correct localization of a computed tomography-verified right ventricular lead into the midseptum. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(4):719-725.
Sanz J, Sanchez-Quintana D, Bossone E, Bogaard HJ, Naeije R. Anatomy, function, and dysfunction of the right ventricle: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(12):1463-1482.
Sweeney MO, Prinzen FW. Ventricular pump function and pacing: physiological and clinical integration. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1(2):127-139.
Vassallo JA, Cassidy DM, Miller JM, Buxton AE, Marchlinski FE, Josephson ME. Left ventricular endocardial activation during right ventricular pacing: effect of underlying heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 19867(6):1228-1233.
Hattori M, Naruse Y, Oginosawa Y, et al. Prognostic impact of lead tip position confirmed via computed tomography in patients with right ventricular septal pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(6):921-927.
Varma N, Jia P, Ramanathan C, Rudy Y. RV electrical activation in heart failure during right, left, and biventricular pacing. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(6):567-575.

Auteurs

Karol Curila (K)

Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

Pavel Jurak (P)

Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.

Josef Halamek (J)

Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.

Frits Prinzen (F)

Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Petr Waldauf (P)

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

Jakub Karch (J)

Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

Petr Stros (P)

Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

Filip Plesinger (F)

Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.

Jan Mizner (J)

Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

Marketa Susankova (M)

Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

Radka Prochazkova (R)

Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

Ondrej Sussenbek (O)

Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

Ivo Viscor (I)

Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.

Vlastimil Vondra (V)

Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.

Radovan Smisek (R)

Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.

Pavel Leinveber (P)

International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.

Pavel Osmancik (P)

Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH