Silicone-hydrocoated ureteral stents encrustation and biofilm formation after 3-week dwell time: results of a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study.
Biofilm
Flexible ureteroscopy
Nephrolithiasis
Silicone
Stent encrustation
Ureteral stent
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
22
11
2020
accepted:
19
02
2021
pubmed:
11
3
2021
medline:
29
1
2022
entrez:
10
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To explore the risk of encrustation and biofilm formation for silicone ureteral stents compared to percuflex polymer stents, through a randomized multicenter study. Design, setting and participants: A Multicenter, prospective, randomized, single blind, comparative study of hydrocoated silicone stent (Coloplast Imajin 119 stents were available after removal for analysis, 56 in the silicone and 63 in the Percuflex TM Plus group. Mean dwelling duration was 21.8 days for silicone, 22.1 days for PercuflexTM Plus. There was significantly more biofilm on Percuflex™ Plus compared to silicone (1.24 ± 0.08 vs 0.93 ± 0.09, p = 0.0021), and more mineral encrustation (1.22 ± 0.10 vs 0.78 ± 0.11, p = 0.0048), respectively. This multicenter randomized study shows that silicone-hydrocoated stents are less prone to encrustation than PercuflexTM Plus after a 3-week dwelling period and confirms the low encrustation potential of silicone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33688992
doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03646-0
pii: 10.1007/s00345-021-03646-0
doi:
Substances chimiques
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
0
Polymers
0
Silicones
0
percuflex TM
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3623-3629Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Mosayyebi A, Manes C, Carugo D, Somani B (2018) Advances in ureteral stent design and materials. Springer Curr Urol Rep 19(5):35
doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0779-y
Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Thomas K et al. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis 2018
Finney RP (1978) Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. J Urol 120:678–681
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57326-7
Liatsikos E, Kallidonis P, Stolzenburg J (2009) Ureteral stents : past, present and future. Exp Rev Med Dev 6:313–324
doi: 10.1586/erd.09.5
Joshi HB, Newns N, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley FXJ, Timoney AG (2003) Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure. J Urol 169:1060–1064. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000049198.53424.1d
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000049198.53424.1d
pubmed: 12576846
Tunney MM, Keane PF, Jones DS et al (1996) Comparative assessment of ureteral stent biomaterial encrustation. Biomaterials 17:1541–1546
doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)89780-8
Desgrandchamps F, Daudon M, Le Duc A et al (1997) An in vitro comparison of urease induced encrustation of JJ stents in human urine. Br J Urol 79:24–27
doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.02775.x
Keane PF, Bonner MC, Johnston SR et al (1994) Characterization of biofilm and encrustation on ureteric stents in vivo. Br J Urol 73:687–691
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1994.tb07557.x
Bariol S, Farebrother T, Ruthven S et al (2003) Comparison of urinary stone and stent encrustation: biochemical analysis. J Endourol 17:741–743
doi: 10.1089/089277903770802281
Rouprêt M, Daudon M, Traxer O et al (2005) Can ureteral stent encrustation analysis predict urinary stone composition? J Urol 66:246–251
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.054
Cormio L, Talja M, Koivusalo A, Makisalo H, Wolff H, Ruutu M (1995) Biocompatibility of various indwelling double-J stents. J Urol 153(2):494–496. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199502000-00069
doi: 10.1097/00005392-199502000-00069
pubmed: 7815632
Candela JV, Bellman GC (1997) Ureteral stents: impact of diameter and composition on patient symptoms. J Endourol 11(1):45–47. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1997.11.45
doi: 10.1089/end.1997.11.45
pubmed: 9048298
Denstedt JD, Wollin TA, Reid G (1998) Biomaterials used in urology: current issues of biocompatibility, infection, and encrustation. J Endourol 12(6):493–500. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1998.12.493
doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.493
pubmed: 9895250
Tunney M, Gorman S (2002) Evaluation of a poly(vinyl pyrollidone)-coated biomaterial for urological use. Biomaterials 23(23):4601–4608. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00206-5
doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00206-5
pubmed: 12322981
Wiseman O, Ventimiglia E, Traxer O (2020) Effects of silicone hydrocoated double loop ureteral stent on symptoms and quality of life in patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone: a randomized multicenter clinical study. J Urol 204(4):769–777. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001098 ((Epub 2020 May 5))
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001098
pubmed: 32364838
White IR, Horton NJ, Carpenter J, Statistics Reader in Medical, Social, Pocock SJ (2011) Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d40
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d40
pubmed: 22167782
pmcid: 3273731
European Medicines Agency (2010) Guideline on missing data in confirmatory clinical trials
Choong SKS, Wood S, Whitfiel HN (2000) A model to quantify encrustation on ureteric stents, urethral catheters and polymers intended for urological use. BJU Int 86:414–421
doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2000.00861.x
Mardis HK, Kroeger RM, Morton JJ, Donovan JM (1993) Comparative evaluation of materials used for internal ureteral stents. J Endourol 7(2):105–115. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1993.7.105
doi: 10.1089/end.1993.7.105
pubmed: 8518822
Paick SH, Park HK, Oh SJ, Kim HH (2003) Characteristics of bacterial colonization and urinary tract infection after indwelling of double-J ureteral stent. Urology 62(2):214–217
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00325-X
Bouzidi H, Traxer O, Dore B, Amiel J, Hadjadj H, Conort P, Daudon M et al (2008) Characteristics of encrustation of ureteric stents in patients with urinary stones. Prog Urol 18:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2008.02.004
doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2008.02.004
pubmed: 18501303
Bell ML, Kenward MG, Fairclough DL, Horton NJ (2013) Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not. BMJ 346:e8668. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e8668
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8668
pubmed: 23338004
pmcid: 4688419
Little RJ, D’Agostino R, Cohen ML, Dickersin K, Emerson SS, Farrar JT et al (2012) The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. N Engl J Med 367:1355–1360. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr1203730
doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1203730
pubmed: 23034025
pmcid: 3771340