Stress Distribution Analysis of Novel Dental Mini-Implant Designs to Support Overdenture Prosthesis.


Journal

The Journal of oral implantology
ISSN: 0160-6972
Titre abrégé: J Oral Implantol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7801086

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 11 3 2021
medline: 28 5 2022
entrez: 10 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to test and compare 2 novel dental mini-implant designs to support overdentures with a commercial model, regarding the stress distribution, by photoelastic analysis. Three different mini-implant designs (Ø 2.0 mm × 10 mm) were tested: G1-experimental threaded (design with threads and 3 longitudinal and equidistant self-cutting chamfers), G2-experimental helical (design with 2 long self-cutting chamfers in the helical arrangement), and G3-Intra-Lock System. After including the mini-implants in a photoelastic resin, they were subjected to a static load of 100 N under two situations: axial and inclined model (30°). The fringe orders (n), that represents the intensity of stresses were analyzed around the mini-implants body and quantified using Tardy's method that calculates the maximum shear stress (τ) value in each point selected. In axial models, less stress was observed in the cervical third mini-implants, mainly in G1 and G2. In inclined models (30°), higher stresses were generated on the opposite side of the load application, mainly in the cervical third of G2 and G3. All mini-implant models presented lower tensions in the cervical third compared with the middle and apical third. The new mini-implants tested (G1 and G2) showed lower stresses than the G3 in the cervical third under axial load, while loading in the inclined model generated greater stresses in the cervical of G2.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33690819
pii: 462594
doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00354
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dental Implants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

79-83

Auteurs

Mariana Lima da Costa Valente (ML)

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. Av. do Café, s/n, 14040-904, Ribeirão Preto - SP, Brazil.

Ana Paula Macedo (AP)

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. Av. do Café, s/n, 14040-904, Ribeirão Preto - SP, Brazil.

Andréa Cândido Dos Reis (AC)

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. Av. do Café, s/n, 14040-904, Ribeirão Preto - SP, Brazil.

Articles similaires

Calcium Carbonate Sand Powders Construction Materials Materials Testing

Characterization of 3D printed composite for final dental restorations.

Lucas Eigi Borges Tanaka, Camila da Silva Rodrigues, Manassés Tércio Vieira Grangeiro et al.
1.00
Composite Resins Materials Testing Printing, Three-Dimensional Surface Properties Flexural Strength

Strain learning in protein-based mechanical metamaterials.

Naroa Sadaba, Eva Sanchez-Rexach, Curt Waltmann et al.
1.00
Serum Albumin, Bovine Stress, Mechanical Animals Polymers Materials Testing

Effect of soft tissue thickness on accuracy of conventional and digital implant impression techniques.

Eman Mostafa Awad, Mohamed Maamoun ElSheikh, Azza Abd El Moneim El-Segai
1.00
Dental Impression Technique Humans Dental Implants Computer-Aided Design Dental Impression Materials

Classifications MeSH