Diuretics decrease fluid balance in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation: the randomized-controlled single blind, IRIHS study.
Diuretic
Fluid balance
Mechanical ventilation
Weaning
Journal
Critical care (London, England)
ISSN: 1466-609X
Titre abrégé: Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 03 2021
10 03 2021
Historique:
received:
28
09
2020
accepted:
16
02
2021
entrez:
11
3
2021
pubmed:
12
3
2021
medline:
7
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fluid overload has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a diuretic strategy to overcome positive fluid balance in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation. Design: Multicenter, single-blind, randomized-controlled study. Patients were randomized into a diuretic (furosemide) or a control group. Patients were eligible in case of fluid overload defined as in-ICU weight increase ≥ 3%, invasive mechanical ventilation (FiO 171 patients were randomized. After 5 exclusions, 166 patients were included in the analysis: 77 in the diuretic and 89 in the control group. Fluid balance was 1.4 [- 2.5 to 4.5] kg in the diuretic and 6.4 [0.5-11.2] kg in the control group (p < 0.001). In the multiple imputation analysis, fluid balance was significantly decreased in the diuretic group (mean difference = - 4.8 95% CI [- 7.3 to - 2.5], p < 0.001). Eleven (14%) patients died in the diuretic group and 16 (18%) patients in the control group (p = 0.5). There was a worsening of Acute Kidney Injury in 67 (75.3%) patients of the control group versus 46 (59.7%) patients in the diuretic group (p = 0.03). In this multicenter randomized-controlled study, protocolized diuretic therapy reduced fluid accumulation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation and was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile. Trial registration NCT02345681, Registered January 26 2015, Prospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02345681?term=02345681&draw=2&rank=1 .
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Fluid overload has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a diuretic strategy to overcome positive fluid balance in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation.
METHODS
Design: Multicenter, single-blind, randomized-controlled study. Patients were randomized into a diuretic (furosemide) or a control group. Patients were eligible in case of fluid overload defined as in-ICU weight increase ≥ 3%, invasive mechanical ventilation (FiO
RESULTS
171 patients were randomized. After 5 exclusions, 166 patients were included in the analysis: 77 in the diuretic and 89 in the control group. Fluid balance was 1.4 [- 2.5 to 4.5] kg in the diuretic and 6.4 [0.5-11.2] kg in the control group (p < 0.001). In the multiple imputation analysis, fluid balance was significantly decreased in the diuretic group (mean difference = - 4.8 95% CI [- 7.3 to - 2.5], p < 0.001). Eleven (14%) patients died in the diuretic group and 16 (18%) patients in the control group (p = 0.5). There was a worsening of Acute Kidney Injury in 67 (75.3%) patients of the control group versus 46 (59.7%) patients in the diuretic group (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
In this multicenter randomized-controlled study, protocolized diuretic therapy reduced fluid accumulation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation and was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile. Trial registration NCT02345681, Registered January 26 2015, Prospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02345681?term=02345681&draw=2&rank=1 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 33691730
doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03509-5
pii: 10.1186/s13054-021-03509-5
pmc: PMC7943707
doi:
Substances chimiques
Diuretics
0
Furosemide
7LXU5N7ZO5
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02345681']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
98Références
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 15;195(8):1022-1032
pubmed: 27653798
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 02;19:135
pubmed: 25879573
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1620-8
pubmed: 26109396
Crit Care Med. 2016 May;44(5):981-91
pubmed: 26741579
Anesthesiology. 2011 Sep;115(3):541-7
pubmed: 21792056
JAMA. 2012 Nov 21;308(19):1985-92
pubmed: 23180503
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Dec 15;186(12):1256-63
pubmed: 22997204
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Aug;62(7):936-944
pubmed: 29664109
Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):425-429
pubmed: 29227369
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Apr;31(4):517-23
pubmed: 15754196
Crit Care. 2020 Mar 4;24(1):75
pubmed: 32131879
Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10 Suppl):S309-15
pubmed: 20046115
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 15;354(24):2564-75
pubmed: 16714767
Eur Respir J. 2007 May;29(5):1033-56
pubmed: 17470624
JAMA. 2002 Nov 27;288(20):2547-53
pubmed: 12444861
Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;25(2):210-23
pubmed: 16697087
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1691-9
pubmed: 16625136
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1753-60
pubmed: 22610181
Crit Care. 2015 Jun 15;19:251
pubmed: 26073560
Anesthesiology. 2008 Oct;109(4):723-40
pubmed: 18813052
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Dec;31(12):1643-7
pubmed: 16193330
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1695-1705
pubmed: 27686349
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul;37(7):1166-73
pubmed: 21533569
Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):259-65
pubmed: 20975548
Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct;46(10):1600-1607
pubmed: 29985214
Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1543-54
pubmed: 23528802
Ann Surg. 2007 Apr;245(4):622-8
pubmed: 17414612
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 12;367(2):124-34
pubmed: 22738085
Crit Care. 2020 Feb 28;24(1):70
pubmed: 32111247