Barriers to and facilitators of endorsement for scheduled medicines in podiatry: a qualitative descriptive study.
Barriers
Endorsement for scheduled medicines
Facilitators
Non-medical prescriber
Podiatrists
Podiatry
Qualitative
Scope of practice
Journal
Journal of foot and ankle research
ISSN: 1757-1146
Titre abrégé: J Foot Ankle Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101471610
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Mar 2021
10 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
13
12
2020
accepted:
25
02
2021
entrez:
11
3
2021
pubmed:
12
3
2021
medline:
24
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Australian podiatrists and podiatric surgeons who have successfully completed the requirements for endorsement for scheduled medicines, as directed by the Podiatry Board of Australia, are eligible to prescribe a limited amount of schedule 2, 3, 4 or 8 medications. Registration to become endorsed for scheduled medicines has been available to podiatrists for over 10 years, yet the uptake of training has remained low (approximately 2% of registered podiatrists/podiatry surgeons). This study aimed to explore barriers to and facilitators of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines by podiatrists. Qualitative descriptive methodology informed this research. A purposive maximum variation sampling strategy was used to recruit 13 registered podiatrists and a podiatric surgeon who were either endorsed for scheduled medicines, in training or not endorsed. Semi-structured interviews were employed to collate the data which were analysed using thematic analysis. Three overarching super-ordinate themes were identified which encompassed both barriers and facilitators: (1) competence and autonomy, (2) social and workplace influences, and (3) extrinsic motivators. Within these, several prominent sub-themes emerged of importance to the participants including workplace and social networks role in modelling behaviours, identifying mentors, and access to supervised training opportunities. Stage of life and career often influenced engagement. Additionally, a lack of financial incentive, cost and time involved in training, and lack of knowledge of training requirements were influential barriers. Rural podiatrists encountered a considerable number of barriers in most of the identified areas. A multitude of barriers and facilitators exist for podiatrists as part of the endorsement for scheduled medicines. The findings suggest that a lack of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines training may be assisted by a more structured training process and increasing the number of podiatrists who are endorsed to increase the numbers of role models, mentors, and supervision opportunities. Recommendations are provided for approaches as means of achieving, and sustaining, these outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Australian podiatrists and podiatric surgeons who have successfully completed the requirements for endorsement for scheduled medicines, as directed by the Podiatry Board of Australia, are eligible to prescribe a limited amount of schedule 2, 3, 4 or 8 medications. Registration to become endorsed for scheduled medicines has been available to podiatrists for over 10 years, yet the uptake of training has remained low (approximately 2% of registered podiatrists/podiatry surgeons). This study aimed to explore barriers to and facilitators of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines by podiatrists.
METHODS
METHODS
Qualitative descriptive methodology informed this research. A purposive maximum variation sampling strategy was used to recruit 13 registered podiatrists and a podiatric surgeon who were either endorsed for scheduled medicines, in training or not endorsed. Semi-structured interviews were employed to collate the data which were analysed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Three overarching super-ordinate themes were identified which encompassed both barriers and facilitators: (1) competence and autonomy, (2) social and workplace influences, and (3) extrinsic motivators. Within these, several prominent sub-themes emerged of importance to the participants including workplace and social networks role in modelling behaviours, identifying mentors, and access to supervised training opportunities. Stage of life and career often influenced engagement. Additionally, a lack of financial incentive, cost and time involved in training, and lack of knowledge of training requirements were influential barriers. Rural podiatrists encountered a considerable number of barriers in most of the identified areas.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
A multitude of barriers and facilitators exist for podiatrists as part of the endorsement for scheduled medicines. The findings suggest that a lack of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines training may be assisted by a more structured training process and increasing the number of podiatrists who are endorsed to increase the numbers of role models, mentors, and supervision opportunities. Recommendations are provided for approaches as means of achieving, and sustaining, these outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33691758
doi: 10.1186/s13047-021-00457-9
pii: 10.1186/s13047-021-00457-9
pmc: PMC7944244
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 22;11:CD011227
pubmed: 27873322
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2000 Sep-Oct;16 Suppl 1:S75-83
pubmed: 11054894
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015 Aug 26;8:397-407
pubmed: 26347446
Hum Resour Health. 2014 Mar 06;12:15
pubmed: 24602181
J Law Med. 2017;24(3):656-62
pubmed: 30137761
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2010 Aug 19;3:143-53
pubmed: 21197363
J Foot Ankle Res. 2010 Jan 05;3(1):1
pubmed: 20051138
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):105
pubmed: 32041600
BMJ Open. 2019 May 19;9(5):e024991
pubmed: 31110086
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:37-45
pubmed: 22359462
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 6;13(3):e0193286
pubmed: 29509763
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40
pubmed: 10940958
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 24;15:413
pubmed: 26404534
Health Promot J Austr. 2009 Aug;20(2):133-9
pubmed: 19642962
J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Jul 13;11:40
pubmed: 30008807
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 27;11:127
pubmed: 21619565