Improving the diagnosis of heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Atrial Fibrillation
/ physiopathology
Biomarkers
/ blood
Diastole
/ physiology
Echocardiography, Doppler, Pulsed
Female
Heart Failure
/ diagnosis
Humans
Male
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
/ blood
Peptide Fragments
/ blood
Reproducibility of Results
Stroke Volume
/ physiology
Systole
/ physiology
Ventricular Function, Left
/ physiology
atrial fibrillation
diastolic
echocardiography
heart failure
systolic
Journal
Heart (British Cardiac Society)
ISSN: 1468-201X
Titre abrégé: Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9602087
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
received:
30
10
2020
revised:
21
01
2021
accepted:
25
01
2021
pubmed:
12
3
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
11
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To improve the echocardiographic assessment of heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by comparing conventional averaging of consecutive beats with an index-beat approach, whereby measurements are taken after two cycles with similar R-R interval. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed using a standardised and blinded protocol in patients enrolled in the RATE-AF (RAte control Therapy Evaluation in permanent Atrial Fibrillation) randomised trial. We compared reproducibility of the index-beat and conventional consecutive-beat methods to calculate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS) and E/e' (mitral E wave max/average diastolic tissue Doppler velocity), and assessed intraoperator/interoperator variability, time efficiency and validity against natriuretic peptides. 160 patients were included, 46% of whom were women, with a median age of 75 years (IQR 69-82) and a median heart rate of 100 beats per minute (IQR 86-112). The index-beat had the lowest within-beat coefficient of variation for LVEF (32%, vs 51% for 5 consecutive beats and 53% for 10 consecutive beats), GLS (26%, vs 43% and 42%) and E/e' (25%, vs 41% and 41%). Intraoperator (n=50) and interoperator (n=18) reproducibility were both superior for index-beats and this method was quicker to perform (p<0.001): 35.4 s to measure E/e' (95% CI 33.1 to 37.8) compared with 44.7 s for 5-beat (95% CI 41.8 to 47.5) and 98.1 s for 10-beat (95% CI 91.7 to 104.4) analyses. Using a single index-beat did not compromise the association of LVEF, GLS or E/e' with natriuretic peptide levels. Compared with averaging of multiple beats in patients with AF, the index-beat approach improves reproducibility and saves time without a negative impact on validity, potentially improving the diagnosis and classification of heart failure in patients with AF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33692093
pii: heartjnl-2020-318557
doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318557
pmc: PMC8142420
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Peptide Fragments
0
pro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)
0
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
114471-18-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
902-908Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : CDF-2015-08-074
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S003991/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : AA/18/2/34218
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: KVB reports she was the research fellow for the RATE-AF trial funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Career Development Fellowship awarded to DK. SG: none directly relevant to this work; funding through the BigData@Heart Innovative Medicines Initiative (grant no 116074). GL: none directly relevant to this work; consultant for Bayer/Janssen, BMS/Pfizer, Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Verseon and Daiichi Sankyo; and speaker for Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim and Daiichi Sankyo; no fees are directly received personally. PK reports grants from NIHR, European Union and British Heart Foundation, during the conduct of the study; grants and non-financial support from the European Union, British Heart Foundation, Leducq Foundation, Medical Research Council (UK) and German Centre for Heart Research, from several drug and device companies active in atrial fibrillation, and has received honoraria from several such companies, outside the submitted work; in addition, PK is listed as inventor on two patents held by the University of Birmingham (Atrial Fibrillation Therapy WO 2015140571, Markers for Atrial Fibrillation WO 2016012783). JC: none directly relevant to this work; reports grants and personal fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo and Pfizer/BMS; and personal fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Abbott. KR reports grants from NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford; grants from UKRI’s Global Challenge Research Fund (ESRC), PEAK Urban Programme Grant Ref: ES/P011055/1; grants from the British Heart Foundation (grant numbers: FS/19/36/34346 and PG/18/65/33872); grants from Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from PLOS Medicine and from BMJ Heart, outside the submitted work. DK reports grants from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR CDF-2015-08-074 and NIHR HTA-130280), the British Heart Foundation (PG/17/55/33087 and AA/18/2/34218), the European Society of Cardiology supported by educational grants from Boehringer Ingelheim/BMS-Pfizer Alliance/Bayer/Daiichi Sankyo/Boston Scientific, the NIHR/University of Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and British Heart Foundation/University of Birmingham Accelerator Award (STEEER-AF NCT04396418), EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative (BigData@Heart 116074) and IRCCS San Raffaele/Menarini (Beta-blockers in Heart Failure Collaborative Group NCT0083244), in addition to personal fees from Bayer (Advisory Board), AtriCure (Speaker fees), Amomed (Advisory Board), Protherics Medicines Development (Advisory Board) and Myokardia (Advisory Board), all outside the submitted work.
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;68(20):2217-2228
pubmed: 27855811
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Apr 28;6(5):
pubmed: 28455344
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 20;7(7):e015099
pubmed: 28729311
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Sep;25(9):945-52
pubmed: 22763084
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 1;39(1):26-35
pubmed: 29040525
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 Apr;11(3):296-301
pubmed: 20022868
Eur Heart J. 2019 Apr 21;40(16):1268-1276
pubmed: 30615112
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1-39.e14
pubmed: 25559473
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Dec;32(12):1505-1515
pubmed: 31653530
Int J Cardiol. 2006 Oct 26;113(1):54-60
pubmed: 16352354
Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 7;36(46):3250-7
pubmed: 26419625
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Dec 15;82(12):1496-500
pubmed: 9874054
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Feb;46(2):255-262
pubmed: 31784201
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Sep;25(9):953-9
pubmed: 22763085
Europace. 2017 Sep 1;19(9):1427-1438
pubmed: 28387802
J Clin Ultrasound. 1979 Aug;7(4):263-8
pubmed: 112113
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Oct;2(10):1147-56
pubmed: 19833302
BMC Med. 2019 Apr 3;17(1):72
pubmed: 30943979
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Oct 1;94(7):942-4
pubmed: 15464684
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;17(4):355-83
pubmed: 26864186
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004 Jan;286(1):H145-52
pubmed: 12958036
Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 7;37(38):2893-2962
pubmed: 27567408
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Apr;32(4):495-502.e3
pubmed: 30718021
JAMA. 2020 Dec 22;324(24):2497-2508
pubmed: 33351042
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Feb 21;8(1):29
pubmed: 29468335
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):3972-81
pubmed: 22764084
Circ Res. 2017 Jul 7;121(2):181-195
pubmed: 28684623
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jan 15;139:40-49
pubmed: 33065079