Endoscopic Lateral Osteotomy in Rhinoplasty.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
11
3
2021
pubmed:
12
3
2021
medline:
24
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to investigate the advantages of endoscopic lateral osteotomy, to evaluate the effects of the periosteal elevation on ecchymosis and to search the reasons for the ecchymosis and the intranasal mucosal tears. On a randomly chosen side a subperiosteal tunnel was elevated, on the other side a subperiosteal tunnel was not elevated. Bilateral lateral osteotomies were performed. Internal nasal packing was not used. The post-operative care was similar for all patients. The patients were evaluated on the third post-operative day. The intranasal mucosal tears, the lateral osteotomy cut on the periosteal elevation side were examined using endoscopes. The degree of ecchymosis was determined by 2 other surgeons, who were unaware of the elevated side, using the grading system adapted from Hoffman et al. The intranasal mucosal injury was seen in 16 of non-elevated side whereas it was 14 on the periosteal elevated side. Endoscopy showed the perforating arteries and elevation of the periosteum caused rupture and oozing from these arteries which might be a cause for ecchymosis. Ecchymosis was more severe on the side with subperiosteal tunnel in 6 patients; whereas only in 2 patients it was more severe on the side with no subperiosteal tunnel elevation while in 12 patients the degree of ecchymosis was the same on both sides. Endoscopy gives a great opportunity to visualize the lateral osteotomy site. Besides the lateral osteotomy cut, the arteries and the intranasal mucosal injury can be visualized. Periost elevation increases the severity of ecchymosis due to the rupture of the perforating arteries, not due to the trauma of the angular artery. Intramucosal tears do not increase the severity of the ecchymosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33704992
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006846
pii: 00001665-202104000-00040
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
609-611Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Rohrich RJ, Krueger JK, Adams JW, et al. Achieving consistency in the lateral nasal osteotomy during rhinoplasty: an external perforated technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108:2122–2130. . discussion 2131-2122.
Hoffmann DF, Cook TA, Quatela VC, et al. Steroids and rhinoplasty. A double-blind study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117:990–993.
Ilhan AE, Cengiz B, Caypinar Eser B. Double-blind comparison of ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy in terms of early postoperative Edema and ecchymosis. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36:390–401.
Kim J, Kim SH, Hwang SH. Method of lateral osteotomy to reduce eyelid edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2020.
Sinha V, Gupta D, More Y, et al. Externalvs.internalosteotomyin rhinoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 59:9–12.
Tardy M, Denneny J. Micro-osteotomies in Rhinoplasty-technical refinement. Facial Plast Surg 1984; 1:137–145.
Kara CO, Kara IG, Yaylali V. Subconjunctival ecchymosis due to rhinoplasty. Rhinology 2001; 39:166–168.
Al-Arfaj A, Al-Qattan M, Al-Harethy S, et al. Effect of periosteum elevation on periorbital ecchymosis in rhinoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62:538–539.
El-Sisi H, Abdelwahab M, Most SP. Association of periosteal sweeping vs periosteal preservation with early periorbital sequelae among patients undergoing external perforating osteotomy during rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2019; 21:185–190.
Ford CN, Battaglia DG, Gentry LR. Preservation of periosteal attachment in lateral osteotomy. Ann Plast Surg 1984; 13:107–111.
Rohrich RJ, Minoli JJ, Adams WP, et al. The lateral nasal osteotomy in rhinoplasty: an anatomic endoscopic comparison of the external versus the internal approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99:1309–1312. . discussion 1313.
Acion L, Peterson JJ, Temple S, et al. Probabilistic index: an intuitive non-parametric approach to measuring the size of treatment effects. Stat Med 2006; 25:591–602.
Motamed S, Saberi A, Niazi F, et al. Complications of internal continuous and perforating external osteotomy in primary rhinoplasty. World J Plast Surg 2017; 6:164–169.
Rees TD. Nasal osteotomies: a clinical comparison of the perforating methods versus the continuous technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115:1783–1784.
Kilic C, Tuncel U, Comert E, et al. Effect of the rhinoplasty technique and lateral osteotomy on periorbital Edema and ecchymosis. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26:e430–e433.
Yucel OT. Which type of osteotomy for edema and ecchymosis: external or internal? Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55:587–590.
Hashemi M, Mokhtarinejad F, Omrani MA. Comparison between external versus internal lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty. J Res Med Sci 2005; 1:e95–e98.