Non-maintenance intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction therapy with eight doses in patients with high- or highest-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a retrospective non-randomized comparative study.


Journal

BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 21 11 2020
accepted: 22 02 2021
entrez: 12 3 2021
pubmed: 13 3 2021
medline: 4 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To explore possible solutions to overcome chronic Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage affecting seriously the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in Europe and throughout the world, we investigated whether non-maintenance eight-dose induction BCG (iBCG) was comparable to six-dose iBCG plus maintenance BCG (mBCG). This observational study evaluated 2669 patients with high- or highest-risk NMIBC who treated with iBCG with or without mBCG during 2000-2019. The patients were classified into five groups according to treatment pattern: 874 (33%) received non-maintenance six-dose iBCG (Group A), 405 (15%) received six-dose iBCG plus mBCG (Group B), 1189 (44%) received non-maintenance seven-/eight-dose iBCG (Group C), 60 (2.2%) received seven-/eight-dose iBCG plus mBCG, and 141 (5.3%) received only ≤5-dose iBCG. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival, and cancer-specific survival were estimated and compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test, respectively. Propensity score-based one-to-one matching was performed using a multivariable logistic regression model based on covariates to obtain balanced groups. To eliminate possible immortal bias, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month conditional landmark analyses of RFS were performed. RFS comparison confirmed that mBCG yielded significant benefit following six-dose iBCG (Group B) in recurrence risk reduction compared to iBCG alone (groups A and C) before (P < 0.001 and P = 0.0016, respectively) and after propensity score matching (P = 0.001 and P = 0.0074, respectively). Propensity score-matched sequential landmark analyses revealed no significant differences between groups B and C at 12, 18, and 24 months, whereas landmark analyses at 6 and 12 months showed a benefit of mBCG following six-dose iBCG compared to non-maintenance six-dose iBCG (P = 0.0055 and P = 0.032, respectively). There were no significant differences in the risks of progression and cancer-specific death in all comparisons of the matched cohorts. Although non-maintenance eight-dose iBCG was inferior to six-dose iBCG plus mBCG, the former might be an alternative remedy in the BCG shortage era. To overcome this challenge, further investigation is warranted to confirm the real clinical value of non-maintenance eight-dose iBCG.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To explore possible solutions to overcome chronic Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage affecting seriously the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in Europe and throughout the world, we investigated whether non-maintenance eight-dose induction BCG (iBCG) was comparable to six-dose iBCG plus maintenance BCG (mBCG).
METHODS METHODS
This observational study evaluated 2669 patients with high- or highest-risk NMIBC who treated with iBCG with or without mBCG during 2000-2019. The patients were classified into five groups according to treatment pattern: 874 (33%) received non-maintenance six-dose iBCG (Group A), 405 (15%) received six-dose iBCG plus mBCG (Group B), 1189 (44%) received non-maintenance seven-/eight-dose iBCG (Group C), 60 (2.2%) received seven-/eight-dose iBCG plus mBCG, and 141 (5.3%) received only ≤5-dose iBCG. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival, and cancer-specific survival were estimated and compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test, respectively. Propensity score-based one-to-one matching was performed using a multivariable logistic regression model based on covariates to obtain balanced groups. To eliminate possible immortal bias, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month conditional landmark analyses of RFS were performed.
RESULTS RESULTS
RFS comparison confirmed that mBCG yielded significant benefit following six-dose iBCG (Group B) in recurrence risk reduction compared to iBCG alone (groups A and C) before (P < 0.001 and P = 0.0016, respectively) and after propensity score matching (P = 0.001 and P = 0.0074, respectively). Propensity score-matched sequential landmark analyses revealed no significant differences between groups B and C at 12, 18, and 24 months, whereas landmark analyses at 6 and 12 months showed a benefit of mBCG following six-dose iBCG compared to non-maintenance six-dose iBCG (P = 0.0055 and P = 0.032, respectively). There were no significant differences in the risks of progression and cancer-specific death in all comparisons of the matched cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although non-maintenance eight-dose iBCG was inferior to six-dose iBCG plus mBCG, the former might be an alternative remedy in the BCG shortage era. To overcome this challenge, further investigation is warranted to confirm the real clinical value of non-maintenance eight-dose iBCG.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33706705
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07966-7
pii: 10.1186/s12885-021-07966-7
pmc: PMC7948348
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adjuvants, Immunologic 0
BCG Vaccine 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

266

Références

Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):639-657
pubmed: 31443960
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jan;7(1):16
pubmed: 30788363
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(4):1107-10
pubmed: 21133632
BJU Int. 2020 Feb;125(2):197-205
pubmed: 31597003
Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Apr;12(4):225-35
pubmed: 25800393
Eur Urol. 2007 Nov;52(5):1398-406
pubmed: 17485161
Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:248-257
pubmed: 29499363
Eur Urol. 2013 Oct;64(4):579-85
pubmed: 23711538
Int J Urol. 2020 Sep;27(9):702-709
pubmed: 32564429
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 May;4(3):363-71
pubmed: 21586725
Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Nov 28;20(12):84
pubmed: 31781942
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Mar;7(3):271-279
pubmed: 28980833
BJU Int. 2002 May;89(7):671-80
pubmed: 11966623
Diseases. 2019 Jun 18;7(2):
pubmed: 31216733
Eur Urol. 2013 Mar;63(3):462-72
pubmed: 23141049
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb 15;167(4):492-9
pubmed: 18056625
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):552-559
pubmed: 28456635
Int Urol Nephrol. 1997;29(5):557-63
pubmed: 9413763
Urol Int. 2016;96(1):20-4
pubmed: 26201964
Bladder Cancer. 2017 Jul 27;3(3):227-228
pubmed: 28824951
J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1242-7
pubmed: 16145378
J Urol. 2000 Apr;163(4):1124-9
pubmed: 10737480
Int J Urol. 2015 Jun;22(6):541-7
pubmed: 25857336
Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):106-119
pubmed: 26996659
J Glob Oncol. 2019 Aug;5:1-9
pubmed: 31454284
Eur Urol. 2008 Nov;54(5):971-3
pubmed: 18585842
BJU Int. 2018 Feb;121(2):169-172
pubmed: 29072817
Immunotargets Ther. 2020 Feb 13;9:1-11
pubmed: 32104666

Auteurs

Makito Miyake (M)

Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Nara, 634-8522, Japan. makitomiyake@yahoo.co.jp.

Kota Iida (K)

Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.

Nobutaka Nishimura (N)

Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.

Tatsuki Miyamoto (T)

Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.

Kiyohide Fujimoto (K)

Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.

Ryotaro Tomida (R)

Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.

Kazumasa Matsumoto (K)

Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.

Kazuyuki Numakura (K)

Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.

Junichi Inokuchi (J)

Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Shuichi Morizane (S)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.

Takahiro Yoneyama (T)

Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan.

Yoshiaki Matsumura (Y)

Department of Urology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan.

Takashige Abe (T)

Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

Masaharu Inoue (M)

Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.

Takeshi Yamada (T)

Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Naoki Terada (N)

Department of Urology, Miyazaki University, Miyazaki, Japan.

Shuya Hirao (S)

Department of Urology, Hirao Hospital, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.

Motohide Uemura (M)

Department of Urology, Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Yuto Matsushita (Y)

Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.

Rikiya Taoka (R)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan.

Takashi Kobayashi (T)

Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Takahiro Kojima (T)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Yoshiyuki Matsui (Y)

Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Hiroshi Kitamura (H)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.

Hiroyuki Nishiyama (H)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH