Prospective Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based, Real-Time Suicide Risk Model.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2021
01 03 2021
Historique:
entrez:
12
3
2021
pubmed:
13
3
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Numerous prognostic models of suicide risk have been published, but few have been implemented outside of integrated managed care systems. To evaluate performance of a suicide attempt risk prediction model implemented in a vendor-supplied electronic health record to predict subsequent (1) suicidal ideation and (2) suicide attempt. This observational cohort study evaluated implementation of a suicide attempt prediction model in live clinical systems without alerting. The cohort comprised patients seen for any reason in adult inpatient, emergency department, and ambulatory surgery settings at an academic medical center in the mid-South from June 2019 to April 2020. Primary measures assessed external, prospective, and concurrent validity. Manual medical record validation of coded suicide attempts confirmed incident behaviors with intent to die. Subgroup analyses were performed based on demographic characteristics, relevant clinical context/setting, and presence or absence of universal screening. Performance was evaluated using discrimination (number needed to screen, C statistics, positive/negative predictive values) and calibration (Spiegelhalter z statistic). Recalibration was performed with logistic calibration. The system generated 115 905 predictions for 77 973 patients (42 490 [54%] men, 35 404 [45%] women, 60 586 [78%] White, 12 620 [16%] Black). Numbers needed to screen in highest risk quantiles were 23 and 271 for suicidal ideation and attempt, respectively. Performance was maintained across demographic subgroups. Numbers needed to screen for suicide attempt by sex were 256 for men and 323 for women; and by race: 373, 176, and 407 for White, Black, and non-White/non-Black patients, respectively. Model C statistics were, across the health system: 0.836 (95% CI, 0.836-0.837); adult hospital: 0.77 (95% CI, 0.77-0.772); emergency department: 0.778 (95% CI, 0.777-0.778); psychiatry inpatient settings: 0.634 (95% CI, 0.633-0.636). Predictions were initially miscalibrated (Spiegelhalter z = -3.1; P = .001) with improvement after recalibration (Spiegelhalter z = 1.1; P = .26). In this study, this real-time predictive model of suicide attempt risk showed reasonable numbers needed to screen in nonpsychiatric specialty settings in a large clinical system. Assuming that research-valid models will translate without performing this type of analysis risks inaccuracy in clinical practice, misclassification of risk, wasted effort, and missed opportunity to correct and prevent such problems. The next step is careful pairing with low-cost, low-harm preventive strategies in a pragmatic trial of effectiveness in preventing future suicidality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33710291
pii: 2777425
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1428
pmc: PMC7955273
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e211428Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH116269
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH121455
Pays : United States
Références
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 10;:
pubmed: 32275300
Prev Med. 2019 Oct;127:105796
pubmed: 31400374
Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7
pubmed: 18064739
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;59(12):1261-1270
pubmed: 29709069
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 1;48(5):1636-1649
pubmed: 30907424
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Sep;71(9):1255-1263
pubmed: 30192068
Mol Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;22(4):544-551
pubmed: 27431294
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep;84(3):362-9
pubmed: 18500243
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 1;175(10):951-960
pubmed: 29792051
J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:174-182
pubmed: 32469801
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 1;76(8):869
pubmed: 31241727
Stat Med. 2004 Aug 30;23(16):2567-86
pubmed: 15287085
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1645-1650
pubmed: 31504588
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 1;77(1):25-34
pubmed: 31642880
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 May;7(5):389-390
pubmed: 32353269
BMJ. 1998 Aug 1;317(7154):307-12
pubmed: 9685274
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 6;17(11):e1003416
pubmed: 33156863
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Sep;156(9):905-9
pubmed: 12197798
PLoS Med. 2013;10(7):e1001491
pubmed: 23935462
BMJ Open. 2011 Jan 1;1(2):e000198
pubmed: 22021884
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 7;19(1):277
pubmed: 31493783
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2141-2142
pubmed: 32356878
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):468-471
pubmed: 32330430
Natl Health Stat Report. 2018 Feb;(108):1-19
pubmed: 29616901
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;72(1):49-57
pubmed: 25390793
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:418-26
pubmed: 25182868
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1448-1457
pubmed: 31397478
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017 Sep;26(3):
pubmed: 28675617
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;35(7):615-617
pubmed: 32623620
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2021189
pubmed: 33084896
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):870-7
pubmed: 24567199
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2020 Jun;208(6):510-513
pubmed: 32472812
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 1;174(2):154-162
pubmed: 27609239
Stat Med. 1986 Sep-Oct;5(5):421-33
pubmed: 3786996
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 1;76(6):642-651
pubmed: 30865249
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jul;93(7):1137-43
pubmed: 12835199
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug 1;180(3):318-24
pubmed: 24966219
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 1;74(6):563-570
pubmed: 28456130
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1052-1061
pubmed: 28379439
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Feb 28;13:111
pubmed: 23448529