Extension study of the safety and efficacy of CLS-TA for treatment of macular oedema associated with non-infectious uveitis (MAGNOLIA).
macula
retina
Journal
The British journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1468-2079
Titre abrégé: Br J Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0421041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
05
08
2020
revised:
16
02
2021
accepted:
21
02
2021
pubmed:
14
3
2021
medline:
26
7
2022
entrez:
13
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the extended efficacy and safety of suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension (CLS-TA) among patients with macular oedema (ME) secondary to non-infectious uveitis (NIU). Patients with uveitic ME were treated with suprachoroidal CLS-TA at baseline and week 12 of the Efficacy and Safety of Suprachoroidal CLS-TA for Macular Edema Secondary to Noninfectious Uveitis: Phase 3 Randomized Trial (PEACHTREE) study. Time to rescue was evaluated over 24 additional weeks for MAGNOLIA. Safety data, visual acuity and retinal central subfield thickness (CST) reduction were also evaluated. Of the 53 eligible patients (46 CLS-TA and 7 control), 33 patients were enrolled (28 CLS-TA and 5 control). Over the entire 48-week period for PEACHTREE and MAGNOLIA, the median time to rescue therapy was 257 days versus 55.5 days for the CLS-TA and sham-control arms, respectively. Of 28 CLS-TA treated patients who participated in MAGNOLIA, 14 (50%) did not require rescue therapy through approximately 9 months after the second treatment. Among CLS-TA patients not requiring rescue, there was a mean gain of 12.1 letters and mean CST reduction of 174.5 µm at week 48. No serious adverse events related to study treatment were observed. Approximately 50% of patients did not require additional treatment for up to 9 months following the last CLS-TA administration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33712478
pii: bjophthalmol-2020-317560
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317560
pmc: PMC9340030
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glucocorticoids
0
Triamcinolone Acetonide
F446C597KA
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1139-1144Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: RNK reports receiving consulting fees from Allergan, Genentech and Regeneron. He also reports receiving grant support from Allergan, Chengdu Kanghong, Clearside Biomedical, Roche and Santen. PM reports receiving consulting fees from Eyepoint, Alimera and Allergan. She also reports receiving grant support from Clearside, Gilead, Santen and NEI. SY reports receiving consulting fees from Clearside Biomedical and Santen. He also reports receiving grant support from Bayer. ES reports receiving consulting fees from Clearside Biomedical, Abbvie, Eyegate, Eyepoint and Gilead. He also reports receiving grant support from Aldeyra. MRB reports receiving consulting fees from Allegro, Allergan, Alimera, Bausch and Lomb, Genentech, Novartis and Regenxbio. EU reports receiving consulting fees from Abbvie, Novartis, Eyepoint, Regeneron, GlaxoSmithKline and Bausch and Lomb. He also reports receiving grant support from Novartis and Roche/Genentech. CRH reports receiving consulting fees from Clearside Biomedical. MS reports receiving grant support from Clearside Biomedical. RCW has nothing to disclose. TC and BK are employees of Clearside Biomedical and hold stock in Clearside Biomedical.
Références
Ophthalmology. 2020 Jul;127(7):948-955
pubmed: 32173113
Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):283-295
pubmed: 30269924
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;97(5):460-472
pubmed: 30702218
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep;140(3):509-16
pubmed: 16196117
J Control Release. 2015 Apr 10;203:109-17
pubmed: 25700623