A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Tedizolid Phosphate and Linezolid for Treatment of Ventilated Gram-Positive Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia.
Staphylococcal infections
gram-positive cocci
healthcare-associated bacterial pneumonia
ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia
Journal
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 08 2021
02 08 2021
Historique:
received:
17
09
2020
pubmed:
16
3
2021
medline:
7
8
2021
entrez:
15
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are associated with high mortality rates. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tedizolid (administered as tedizolid phosphate) for treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. In this randomized, noninferiority, double-blind, double-dummy, global phase 3 trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily for 7 days or intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for 10 days. Treatment was 14 days in patients with concurrent gram-positive bacteremia. The primary efficacy end points were day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM; noninferiority margin, 10%) and investigator-assessed clinical response at test of cure (TOC; noninferiority margin, 12.5%) in the intention-to-treat population. Overall, 726 patients were randomized (tedizolid, n = 366; linezolid, n = 360). Baseline characteristics, including incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (31.3% overall), were well balanced. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM rate: 28.1% and 26.4%, respectively (difference, -1.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.2 to 4.7). Noninferiority of tedizolid was not demonstrated for investigator-assessed clinical cure at TOC (tedizolid, 56.3% vs linezolid, 63.9%; difference, -7.6%; 97.5% CI: -15.7 to 0.5). In post hoc analyses, no single factor accounted for the difference in clinical response between treatment groups. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 8.1% and 11.9% of patients who received tedizolid and linezolid, respectively. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM in the treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. Noninferiority of tedizolid for investigator-assessed clinical response at TOC was not demonstrated. Both drugs were well tolerated. NCT02019420.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are associated with high mortality rates. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tedizolid (administered as tedizolid phosphate) for treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP.
METHODS
In this randomized, noninferiority, double-blind, double-dummy, global phase 3 trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily for 7 days or intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for 10 days. Treatment was 14 days in patients with concurrent gram-positive bacteremia. The primary efficacy end points were day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM; noninferiority margin, 10%) and investigator-assessed clinical response at test of cure (TOC; noninferiority margin, 12.5%) in the intention-to-treat population.
RESULTS
Overall, 726 patients were randomized (tedizolid, n = 366; linezolid, n = 360). Baseline characteristics, including incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (31.3% overall), were well balanced. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM rate: 28.1% and 26.4%, respectively (difference, -1.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.2 to 4.7). Noninferiority of tedizolid was not demonstrated for investigator-assessed clinical cure at TOC (tedizolid, 56.3% vs linezolid, 63.9%; difference, -7.6%; 97.5% CI: -15.7 to 0.5). In post hoc analyses, no single factor accounted for the difference in clinical response between treatment groups. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 8.1% and 11.9% of patients who received tedizolid and linezolid, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM in the treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. Noninferiority of tedizolid for investigator-assessed clinical response at TOC was not demonstrated. Both drugs were well tolerated.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
NCT02019420.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33720350
pii: 6171089
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab032
pmc: PMC8326538
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Organophosphates
0
Oxazoles
0
Linezolid
ISQ9I6J12J
tedizolid phosphate
O7DRJ6R4DW
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02019420']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e710-e718Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U19 AI135964
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 27;370(13):1198-208
pubmed: 24670166
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Dec;52(12):4442-7
pubmed: 18838596
Chest. 2013 Dec;144(6):1759-1767
pubmed: 23788274
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Nov;58(11):6462-70
pubmed: 25136028
Chest. 2005 Jan;127(1):213-9
pubmed: 15653986
J Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 19;219(10):1536-1544
pubmed: 30649434
Clin Ther. 2003 Mar;25(3):980-92
pubmed: 12852712
Infect Dis Ther. 2018 Dec;7(4):509-522
pubmed: 30242736
Euro Surveill. 2018 Nov;23(46):
pubmed: 30458912
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;14(8):696-705
pubmed: 24909499
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Feb 1;32(3):402-12
pubmed: 11170948
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Dec 27;61(1):
pubmed: 27799200
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;63(5):e61-e111
pubmed: 27418577
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;18(3):285-295
pubmed: 29254862
Stat Med. 1985 Apr-Jun;4(2):213-26
pubmed: 4023479
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;34(1):1-14
pubmed: 23221186
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;13(8):665-71
pubmed: 23622939
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Aug;53(8):3236-9
pubmed: 19528279
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Jan 1;52(1):31-40
pubmed: 21148517
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Sep;56(9):4608-13
pubmed: 22687509
JAMA. 2013 Feb 13;309(6):559-69
pubmed: 23403680
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 May;56(5):2627-34
pubmed: 22330925
J Chemother. 2019 Jul;31(4):188-194
pubmed: 31079589
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Mar 1;54(5):621-9
pubmed: 22247123
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 24;(8):CD007577
pubmed: 26301604
JAMA. 2016 Dec 13;316(22):2427-2429
pubmed: 27835709
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jul;43(7):1002-1012
pubmed: 28466147
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Feb;87(2):133-138
pubmed: 27866673
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Aug 1;51 Suppl 1:S81-7
pubmed: 20597676
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;19(12):1299-1311
pubmed: 31563344
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 1;379(18):1732-1744
pubmed: 30380384