A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Tedizolid Phosphate and Linezolid for Treatment of Ventilated Gram-Positive Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia.


Journal

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 08 2021
Historique:
received: 17 09 2020
pubmed: 16 3 2021
medline: 7 8 2021
entrez: 15 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are associated with high mortality rates. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tedizolid (administered as tedizolid phosphate) for treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. In this randomized, noninferiority, double-blind, double-dummy, global phase 3 trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily for 7 days or intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for 10 days. Treatment was 14 days in patients with concurrent gram-positive bacteremia. The primary efficacy end points were day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM; noninferiority margin, 10%) and investigator-assessed clinical response at test of cure (TOC; noninferiority margin, 12.5%) in the intention-to-treat population. Overall, 726 patients were randomized (tedizolid, n = 366; linezolid, n = 360). Baseline characteristics, including incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (31.3% overall), were well balanced. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM rate: 28.1% and 26.4%, respectively (difference, -1.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.2 to 4.7). Noninferiority of tedizolid was not demonstrated for investigator-assessed clinical cure at TOC (tedizolid, 56.3% vs linezolid, 63.9%; difference, -7.6%; 97.5% CI: -15.7 to 0.5). In post hoc analyses, no single factor accounted for the difference in clinical response between treatment groups. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 8.1% and 11.9% of patients who received tedizolid and linezolid, respectively. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM in the treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. Noninferiority of tedizolid for investigator-assessed clinical response at TOC was not demonstrated. Both drugs were well tolerated. NCT02019420.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are associated with high mortality rates. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tedizolid (administered as tedizolid phosphate) for treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP.
METHODS
In this randomized, noninferiority, double-blind, double-dummy, global phase 3 trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily for 7 days or intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for 10 days. Treatment was 14 days in patients with concurrent gram-positive bacteremia. The primary efficacy end points were day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM; noninferiority margin, 10%) and investigator-assessed clinical response at test of cure (TOC; noninferiority margin, 12.5%) in the intention-to-treat population.
RESULTS
Overall, 726 patients were randomized (tedizolid, n = 366; linezolid, n = 360). Baseline characteristics, including incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (31.3% overall), were well balanced. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM rate: 28.1% and 26.4%, respectively (difference, -1.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.2 to 4.7). Noninferiority of tedizolid was not demonstrated for investigator-assessed clinical cure at TOC (tedizolid, 56.3% vs linezolid, 63.9%; difference, -7.6%; 97.5% CI: -15.7 to 0.5). In post hoc analyses, no single factor accounted for the difference in clinical response between treatment groups. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 8.1% and 11.9% of patients who received tedizolid and linezolid, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM in the treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. Noninferiority of tedizolid for investigator-assessed clinical response at TOC was not demonstrated. Both drugs were well tolerated.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
NCT02019420.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33720350
pii: 6171089
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab032
pmc: PMC8326538
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Organophosphates 0
Oxazoles 0
Linezolid ISQ9I6J12J
tedizolid phosphate O7DRJ6R4DW

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02019420']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e710-e718

Subventions

Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U19 AI135964
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 27;370(13):1198-208
pubmed: 24670166
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Dec;52(12):4442-7
pubmed: 18838596
Chest. 2013 Dec;144(6):1759-1767
pubmed: 23788274
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Nov;58(11):6462-70
pubmed: 25136028
Chest. 2005 Jan;127(1):213-9
pubmed: 15653986
J Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 19;219(10):1536-1544
pubmed: 30649434
Clin Ther. 2003 Mar;25(3):980-92
pubmed: 12852712
Infect Dis Ther. 2018 Dec;7(4):509-522
pubmed: 30242736
Euro Surveill. 2018 Nov;23(46):
pubmed: 30458912
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;14(8):696-705
pubmed: 24909499
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Feb 1;32(3):402-12
pubmed: 11170948
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Dec 27;61(1):
pubmed: 27799200
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;63(5):e61-e111
pubmed: 27418577
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;18(3):285-295
pubmed: 29254862
Stat Med. 1985 Apr-Jun;4(2):213-26
pubmed: 4023479
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;34(1):1-14
pubmed: 23221186
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;13(8):665-71
pubmed: 23622939
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Aug;53(8):3236-9
pubmed: 19528279
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Jan 1;52(1):31-40
pubmed: 21148517
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Sep;56(9):4608-13
pubmed: 22687509
JAMA. 2013 Feb 13;309(6):559-69
pubmed: 23403680
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 May;56(5):2627-34
pubmed: 22330925
J Chemother. 2019 Jul;31(4):188-194
pubmed: 31079589
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Mar 1;54(5):621-9
pubmed: 22247123
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 24;(8):CD007577
pubmed: 26301604
JAMA. 2016 Dec 13;316(22):2427-2429
pubmed: 27835709
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jul;43(7):1002-1012
pubmed: 28466147
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Feb;87(2):133-138
pubmed: 27866673
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Aug 1;51 Suppl 1:S81-7
pubmed: 20597676
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;19(12):1299-1311
pubmed: 31563344
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 1;379(18):1732-1744
pubmed: 30380384

Auteurs

Richard G Wunderink (RG)

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Antoine Roquilly (A)

Université de Nantes, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, EA3826 Thérapeutiques Anti-Infectieuses, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, F-44000.

Martin Croce (M)

Regional One Health, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

Daniel Rodriguez Gonzalez (D)

Department of Intensive Care, Nuevo Hospital Civil de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.

Satoshi Fujimi (S)

Department of Trauma, Critical Care, and Emergency Medicine, Osaka General Medical Center, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, Japan.

Joan R Butterton (JR)

Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Natasha Broyde (N)

Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Myra W Popejoy (MW)

Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Jason Y Kim (JY)

Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Carisa De Anda (C)

Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH