Comparative evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays against nucleocapsid and spike antigens.
Adult
Aged
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes
/ immunology
COVID-19
/ diagnosis
Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins
/ immunology
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Female
Flow Cytometry
Humans
Immunoglobulin G
/ analysis
Lymphocyte Subsets
/ immunology
Male
Middle Aged
Negative Results
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
/ immunology
SARS-CoV-2
antibody response
lymphocyte subsets
nucleoprotein
spike
Journal
Human antibodies
ISSN: 1875-869X
Titre abrégé: Hum Antibodies
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9711270
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
pubmed:
16
3
2021
medline:
4
6
2021
entrez:
15
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There are few studies to compare antibody response against anti-spike (S) and anti- nucleoprotein (N) SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the IgG antibody production against S and N antigens of the virus and their correlation with the time and severity of the disease. The IgG antibodies against S and N antigens of SARS-CoV-2 in serum specimens of 72 symptomatic patients who tested real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction positive for SARS-CoV-2 were detected using the ELISA technique. Different antibody response was compared and the correlation with the time from disease onset and the severity was evaluated. Forty-eight of 72 (67%) patients tested positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, while 24 (33%) did not have detectable antibodies. Comparison of antibody levels for N and S antibodies showed that they correlate with each other well (r= 0.81; P< 0.001). However, sensitivity of anti-S SARS-CoV-2 IgG and anti-N SARS-CoV-2 IgG was 30% and 60%, during the first 7 days after symptom onset (r= 0.53; P= 0.111), but increased to 73% and 68% at more than 1-week post symptom onset (r= 0.89, P= 0.111), respectively. Cases with positive IgG response showed a decreased CD8+ T cells percentage compared to the negative IgG groups (26 ± 14 vs. 58 ± 32, p= 0.066 in anti-N IgG group and 28 ± 15 vs. 60 ± 45, p= 0.004 in anti-S IgG group, respectively). Nearly one-third of the confirmed COVID-19 patients had negative serology results. Lower percent positivity at early time points after symptom onset (less than 1 week) was seen using anti-S SARS-COV-2 IgG kit compare to the anti-N SARS-CoV-2 IgG; therefore, clinicians should interpret negative serology results of especially anti-S SARS-CoV-2 IgG with caution.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There are few studies to compare antibody response against anti-spike (S) and anti- nucleoprotein (N) SARS-CoV-2.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the IgG antibody production against S and N antigens of the virus and their correlation with the time and severity of the disease.
METHODS
METHODS
The IgG antibodies against S and N antigens of SARS-CoV-2 in serum specimens of 72 symptomatic patients who tested real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction positive for SARS-CoV-2 were detected using the ELISA technique. Different antibody response was compared and the correlation with the time from disease onset and the severity was evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Forty-eight of 72 (67%) patients tested positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, while 24 (33%) did not have detectable antibodies. Comparison of antibody levels for N and S antibodies showed that they correlate with each other well (r= 0.81; P< 0.001). However, sensitivity of anti-S SARS-CoV-2 IgG and anti-N SARS-CoV-2 IgG was 30% and 60%, during the first 7 days after symptom onset (r= 0.53; P= 0.111), but increased to 73% and 68% at more than 1-week post symptom onset (r= 0.89, P= 0.111), respectively. Cases with positive IgG response showed a decreased CD8+ T cells percentage compared to the negative IgG groups (26 ± 14 vs. 58 ± 32, p= 0.066 in anti-N IgG group and 28 ± 15 vs. 60 ± 45, p= 0.004 in anti-S IgG group, respectively).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Nearly one-third of the confirmed COVID-19 patients had negative serology results. Lower percent positivity at early time points after symptom onset (less than 1 week) was seen using anti-S SARS-COV-2 IgG kit compare to the anti-N SARS-CoV-2 IgG; therefore, clinicians should interpret negative serology results of especially anti-S SARS-CoV-2 IgG with caution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33720878
pii: HAB210440
doi: 10.3233/HAB-210440
doi:
Substances chimiques
Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
0
spike protein, SARS-CoV-2
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM