Altered left atrial 4D flow characteristics in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the absence of apparent remodeling.
Atrial Fibrillation
/ complications
Atrial Remodeling
Blood Flow Velocity
Disease Management
Disease Susceptibility
Electrocardiography
Heart Atria
/ diagnostic imaging
Hemodynamics
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
/ methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Observer Variation
Thromboembolism
/ etiology
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 03 2021
16 03 2021
Historique:
received:
10
11
2020
accepted:
23
02
2021
entrez:
17
3
2021
pubmed:
18
3
2021
medline:
16
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The pathophysiology behind thrombus formation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is very complex. This can be due to left atrial (LA) flow changes, remodeling, or both. We investigated differences for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived LA 4D flow and remodeling characteristics between paroxysmal AF patients and patients without cardiac disease. In this proof-of-concept study, the 4D flow data were acquired in 10 patients with paroxysmal AF (age = 61 ± 8 years) and 5 age/gender matched controls (age = 56 ± 1 years) during sinus rhythm. The following LA and LA appendage flow parameters were obtained: flow velocity (mean, peak), stasis defined as the relative volume with velocities < 10 cm/s, and kinetic energy (KE). Furthermore, LA global strain values were derived from b-SSFP cine images using dedicated CMR feature-tracking software. Even in sinus rhythm, LA mean and peak flow velocities over the entire cardiac cycle were significantly lower in paroxysmal AF patients compared to controls [(13.1 ± 2.4 cm/s vs. 16.7 ± 2.1 cm/s, p = 0.01) and (19.3 ± 4.7 cm/s vs. 26.8 ± 5.5 cm/s, p = 0.02), respectively]. Moreover, paroxysmal AF patients expressed more stasis of blood than controls both in the LA (43.2 ± 10.8% vs. 27.8 ± 7.9%, p = 0.01) and in the LA appendage (73.3 ± 5.7% vs. 52.8 ± 16.2%, p = 0.04). With respect to energetics, paroxysmal AF patients demonstrated lower mean and peak KE values (indexed to maximum LA volume) than controls. No significant differences were observed for LA volume, function, and strain parameters between the groups. Global LA flow dynamics in paroxysmal AF patients appear to be impaired including mean/peak flow velocity, stasis fraction, and KE, partly independent of LA remodeling. This pathophysiological flow pattern may be of clinical value to explain the increased incidence of thromboembolic events in paroxysmal AF patients, in the absence of actual AF or LA remodeling.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33727587
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85176-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-85176-8
pmc: PMC7966746
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5965Références
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;17(11):1259-1268
pubmed: 26590397
Am J Physiol. 1949 Dec;159(3):483-91
pubmed: 15401092
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Nov 27;50(22):2156-61
pubmed: 18036454
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:208-13
pubmed: 27389443
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Oct 27;66(17):1851-9
pubmed: 26493655
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 03;6:31042
pubmed: 27485817
Eur Heart J. 2018 Apr 21;39(16):1416-1425
pubmed: 29300883
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011 Jan 14;13:7
pubmed: 21235751
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Aug 12;16:60
pubmed: 25196447
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Sep;9(9):e004984
pubmed: 27613699
Magn Reson Med. 1998 Feb;39(2):300-8
pubmed: 9469714
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Sep;38(3):580-7
pubmed: 23292793
Am J Cardiol. 1996 May 15;77(12):1098-104
pubmed: 8644665
Lancet. 2009 Jan 10;373(9658):155-66
pubmed: 19135613
Circulation. 2014 May 27;129(21):2094-9
pubmed: 24633881
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Sep;11(9):545-53
pubmed: 24889521
Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 7;37(38):2893-2962
pubmed: 27567408
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013 May 15;114(10):1472-81
pubmed: 23493355
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jan;35(1):183-7
pubmed: 10636278
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 1;100(1):122-7
pubmed: 17599453
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Sep 1;20(9):979-987
pubmed: 31356656
Am Heart J. 2016 Nov;181:145-152
pubmed: 27823686
Stroke. 1991 Aug;22(8):983-8
pubmed: 1866765
Chest. 2010 Feb;137(2):263-72
pubmed: 19762550