The Neural Bases of Drawing. A Meta-analysis and a Systematic Literature Review of Neurofunctional Studies in Healthy Individuals.


Journal

Neuropsychology review
ISSN: 1573-6660
Titre abrégé: Neuropsychol Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9009029

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 05 06 2020
accepted: 01 03 2021
pubmed: 18 3 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 17 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Drawing is a multi-component process requiring a wide range of cognitive abilities. Several studies on patients with focal brain lesions and functional neuroimaging studies on healthy individuals demonstrated that drawing is associated with a wide brain network. However, the neural structures specifically related to drawing remain to be better comprehended. We conducted a systematic review complemented by a meta-analytic approach to identify the core neural underpinnings related to drawing in healthy individuals. In analysing the selected studies, we took into account the type of the control task employed (i.e. motor or non-motor) and the type of drawn stimulus (i.e. geometric, figurative, or nonsense). The results showed that a fronto-parietal network, particularly on the left side of the brain, was involved in drawing when compared with other motor activities. Drawing figurative images additionally activated the inferior frontal gyrus and the inferior temporal cortex, brain areas involved in selection of semantic features of objects and in visual semantic processing. Moreover, copying more than drawing from memory was associated with the activation of extrastriate cortex (BA 18, 19). The activation likelihood estimation coordinate-based meta-analysis revealed a core neural network specifically associated with drawing which included the premotor area (BA 6) and the inferior parietal lobe (BA 40) bilaterally, and the left precuneus (BA 7).These results showed that a fronto-parietal network is specifically involved in drawing and suggested that a crucial role is played by the (left) inferior parietal lobe, consistent with classical literature on constructional apraxia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33728526
doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09494-4
pii: 10.1007/s11065-021-09494-4
pmc: PMC8593049
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

689-702

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Neuroradiology. 2008 Apr;50(4):367-75
pubmed: 18172628
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 May;16(3):338-47
pubmed: 12706214
Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;151:331-348
pubmed: 29519467
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Sep;80:646-656
pubmed: 28743620
Neuroimage. 2016 Aug 15;137:70-85
pubmed: 27179606
Behav Brain Res. 2012 Jul 15;233(1):209-16
pubmed: 22609273
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Dec 1;40(17):5142-5154
pubmed: 31379049
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Jan;84:151-161
pubmed: 29180258
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Sep;56:73-96
pubmed: 26112130
Neuroreport. 2007 Jul 16;18(11):1089-93
pubmed: 17589305
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Cortex. 2009 Mar;45(3):386-93
pubmed: 19111291
Neurosci Res. 2003 Jan;45(1):71-7
pubmed: 12507726
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1783-94
pubmed: 21854855
Eur J Neurosci. 1997 Feb;9(2):378-89
pubmed: 9058057
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Mar;47(4):1013-22
pubmed: 19027762
Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:66-80
pubmed: 28081451
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2349-61
pubmed: 21963913
Behav Brain Res. 1997 Dec;89(1-2):129-34
pubmed: 9475621
J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 28;29(43):13735-41
pubmed: 19864586
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jun;52(6):377-84
pubmed: 9764259
Neuroimage. 2017 May 15;152:482-496
pubmed: 28323166
Nature. 2005 Mar 17;434(7031):301-7
pubmed: 15772645
Behav Brain Res. 2002 Apr 1;131(1-2):163-8
pubmed: 11844583
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14792-7
pubmed: 9405692
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Feb;74(2):144-8
pubmed: 8431097
Neuroimage. 2000 Dec;12(6):698-706
pubmed: 11112401
Brain Lang. 2006 Apr;97(1):53-63
pubmed: 16129481
Neuropsychology. 2009 Mar;23(2):231-9
pubmed: 19254096
Prog Brain Res. 1993;95:317-37
pubmed: 8493342
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Dec;112(3):462-74
pubmed: 9007548
Neuron. 2005 Sep 15;47(6):907-18
pubmed: 16157284
Neuroimage. 2002 Jul;16(3 Pt 1):765-80
pubmed: 12169260
Neuroimage. 2007 Jun;36(2):396-410
pubmed: 17448689
Neurol Sci. 2020 Apr;41(4):981-988
pubmed: 31820324
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Oct 1;45(13):2883-901
pubmed: 17675110
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Feb 05;13:25
pubmed: 30804769
Neuroimage. 2004 Mar;21(3):904-13
pubmed: 15006657
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Dec;26(12):2701-15
pubmed: 24893744
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Nov;28(11):1194-205
pubmed: 17266101
Neuropsychology. 2008 Sep;22(5):553-62
pubmed: 18763875
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 15;102 Pt 2:608-19
pubmed: 25128710
J Neurosci. 2017 Sep 6;37(36):8767-8782
pubmed: 28821655
J Neurosci. 1995 May;15(5 Pt 1):3284-306
pubmed: 7538558
Brain Cogn. 2015 Aug;98:15-26
pubmed: 26051526
Cortex. 2009 Mar;45(3):269-77
pubmed: 19131051
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Sep;30(9):2907-26
pubmed: 19172646
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Apr 18;11:622-634
pubmed: 27182489
Neuroimage. 1999 Aug;10(2):181-92
pubmed: 10417250
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Sep;9(9):1395-403
pubmed: 23934416
Brain. 1960;83:225-42
pubmed: 14432834
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 01;9(10):e108628
pubmed: 25271440
Cortex. 2009 Mar;45(3):394-406
pubmed: 18715555
Brain. 2003 Nov;126(Pt 11):2463-75
pubmed: 14506065
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Oct;20(10):773-784
pubmed: 27615805
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Aug;37(7):1297-310
pubmed: 23567522
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Jan;33(1):1-13
pubmed: 21305667
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Jan;38(1):7-11
pubmed: 27511454
Neuroimage Clin. 2018;20:901-912
pubmed: 30292089
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 1;206:116321
pubmed: 31678500
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Sep;62:68-76
pubmed: 25062545
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jan;96:197-209
pubmed: 30316722
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):155-64
pubmed: 15846811
Science. 2000 Aug 18;289(5482):1206-8
pubmed: 10947990
PLoS One. 2015 May 08;10(5):e0126723
pubmed: 25955655
Brain. 1983 Sep;106 (Pt 3):613-22
pubmed: 6640272
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 May;28(5):450-9
pubmed: 16944477
Cortex. 2007 Apr;43(3):289-300
pubmed: 17533753

Auteurs

Simona Raimo (S)

Department of Psychology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Caserta, Italy.

Gabriella Santangelo (G)

Department of Psychology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Caserta, Italy.

Luigi Trojano (L)

Department of Psychology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Caserta, Italy. luigi.trojano@unicampania.it.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH