STEPFORWARD study: a randomised controlled feasibility trial of a self-aligning prosthetic ankle-foot for older patients with vascular-related amputations.
clinical trials
foot & ankle
musculoskeletal disorders
rehabilitation medicine
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 03 2021
18 03 2021
Historique:
entrez:
19
3
2021
pubmed:
20
3
2021
medline:
20
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To determine the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a self-aligning prosthetic ankle-foot compared with a standard prosthetic ankle-foot. Multicentre parallel group feasibility RCT. Five prosthetics centres in England recruiting from July 2018 to August 2019. Adults aged ≥50 years with a vascular-related or non-traumatic transtibial amputation for 1 year or longer, categorised as having 'limited community mobility' and using a non-self-aligning ankle-foot. Participants were randomised into one of two groups for 12 weeks: self-aligning prosthetic ankle-foot or existing non-self-aligning prosthetic ankle-foot. Feasibility measures: recruitment, consent and retention rates; and completeness of questionnaire and clinical assessment datasets across multiple time points. Feasibility of collecting daily activity data with wearable technology and health resource use data with a bespoke questionnaire. Fifty-five participants were randomised (61% of the target 90 participants): n=27 self-aligning ankle-foot group, n=28 non-self-aligning ankle-foot group. Fifty-one participants were included in the final analysis (71% of the target number of participants). The consent rate and retention at final follow-up were 86% and 93%, respectively. The average recruitment rate was 1.25 participants/site/month (95% CI 0.39 to 2.1). Completeness of questionnaires ranged from 89%-94%, and clinical assessments were 92%-95%, including the activity monitor data. The average completion rates for the EQ-5D-5L and bespoke resource use questionnaire were 93% and 63%, respectively. This feasibility trial recruited and retained participants who were categorised as having 'limited community mobility' following a transtibial amputation. The high retention rate of 93% indicated the trial was acceptable to participants and feasible to deliver as a full-scale RCT. The findings support a future, fully powered evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a self-aligning prosthetic ankle-foot compared with a standard non-self-aligning version with some adjustments to the trial design and delivery. ISRCTN15043643.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33737440
pii: bmjopen-2020-045195
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045195
pmc: PMC7978257
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e045195Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Gait Posture. 2008 Aug;28(2):235-42
pubmed: 18242995
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(57):1-210
pubmed: 26211920
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):743-8
pubmed: 15129398
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Aug;82(8):1031-7
pubmed: 11494181
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2006 Aug;30(2):213-23
pubmed: 16990231
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD003978
pubmed: 14974050
J Biomech. 2015 Jan 2;48(1):146-52
pubmed: 25480541
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(3):429-37
pubmed: 25019665
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e032924
pubmed: 31542768
PM R. 2019 Apr;11(4):344-353
pubmed: 30195705
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 7;13(2):e0189652
pubmed: 29414988
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Nov;94(11):2194-202
pubmed: 23856150
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):597-612
pubmed: 22773262
Br J Rheumatol. 1997 May;36(5):551-9
pubmed: 9189057
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013 Feb;28(2):218-24
pubmed: 23261018
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8
pubmed: 1991946
Gait Posture. 2013 Jul;38(3):466-70
pubmed: 23433546
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015 Oct;39(5):380-9
pubmed: 24925671
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 29;284(6329):1607-8
pubmed: 6805625
PM R. 2019 Oct;11(10):1050-1058
pubmed: 30729727
BMJ. 2008 Mar 15;336(7644):601-5
pubmed: 18316340
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jan;98(1):105-113
pubmed: 27742450
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Mar 14;16(1):39
pubmed: 30871573
J Rehabil Med. 2014 May;46(5):447-53
pubmed: 24590358
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Aug;85(8):1339-44
pubmed: 15295762
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205
pubmed: 26978655