Concurrent gynecologic surgery and panniculectomy in morbidly obese women with gynecologic cancer, a single-center experience.
Gynecologic cancer
Morbid obesity
Panniculectomy
Retrospective
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
27
01
2020
accepted:
13
03
2021
pubmed:
20
3
2021
medline:
26
11
2021
entrez:
19
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As the prevalence of obesity has been rising during the past decades worldwide and especially in Greece, surgeons have faced significant challenges concerning the treatment of morbidly obese women with gynecologic cancer. Panniculectomy is a safe procedure that offers better visualization of pelvic anatomy and prevention of major complications in these women. Aim of this study is to describe a single-center experience of surgical treatment of morbidly obese women with gynecologic cancer and concurrent panniculectomy. We, also, review the literature for articles that report concurrent gynecologic surgery and panniculectomy, to summarize the complications that were encountered. From 2015 to 2018, 38 obese women were treated with concurrent panniculectomy at the time of gynecologic surgery for cancer in a single institution. Median age was 55.62 years old, median BMI 43.79 kg/m For selected obese patients, concurrent panniculectomy with surgical treatment of gynecological cancer is a safe and efficient procedure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33740102
doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06033-7
pii: 10.1007/s00404-021-06033-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1271-1278Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
WHO. NCD country profile 2014: Greece
Cairns BJ (2015) Cancer and high body-mass index: global burden, global effort? Lancet Oncol 16(1):3–4
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70373-0
Kelly H (1910) Excision of the fat of the abdominal wall-lipectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 10:229–231
Pratt JH, Irons GB (1978) Panniculectomy and abdominoplasty. Am J Obstet Gynecol 132(2):165–168
doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90919-5
Cooper JM et al (2008) Abdominal panniculectomies: high patient satisfaction despite significant complication rates. Ann Plast Surg 61(2):188–196
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318158a7b2
Setiawan VW et al (2013) Type I and II endometrial cancers: have they different risk factors? J Clin Oncol 31(20):2607–2618
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.2596
Obesity Update—OECD 2017
Obesity and overweight—WHO
Kapantais E et al (2006) First national epidemiological survey on the prevalence of obesity and abdominal fat distribution in Greek adults. Ann Nutr Metab 50(4):330–338
doi: 10.1159/000094296
Palmer BF, Clegg DJ (2015) The sexual dimorphism of obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 402:113–119
doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.11.029
Castaneda A et al (2018) Correlation between metabolic syndrome and sleep apnea. World J Diabetes 9(4):66–71
doi: 10.4239/wjd.v9.i4.66
Kaaks R, Lukanova A, Kurzer MS (2002) Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 11(12):1531–1543
Subramaniam A et al (2011) A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 122(3):604–607
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.024
Leitao MM et al (2016) Impact of robotic platforms on surgical approach and costs in the management of morbidly obese patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23(7):2192–2198
doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5062-6
Eddib A et al (2014) Influence of morbid obesity on surgical outcomes in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery. J Gynecol Surg 30(2):81–86
doi: 10.1089/gyn.2012.0142
Pearl ML et al (2000) Panniculectomy in morbidly obese gynecologic oncology patients. Int J Surg Investig 2(1):59–64
pubmed: 12774339
Michaels JT et al (2018) Surgical management of the giant pannus indications strategies and outcomes. Aesthet Plast Surg 42(2):369–375
doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-1041-6
Sachs D, Murray J (2019) Panniculectomy. StatPearls Publishing LLC., Treasure Island
Pearl ML, Valea FA, Chalas E (1998) Panniculectomy and supraumbilical vertical midline incisions in morbidly obese gynecologic oncology patients. J Am Coll Surg 186(6):649–653
doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00094-5
Karastergiou K et al (2012) Sex differences in human adipose tissues—the biology of pear shape. Biol Sex Differ 3(1):13
doi: 10.1186/2042-6410-3-13
Tillmanns TD et al (2001) Panniculectomy with simultaneous gynecologic oncology surgery. Gynecol Oncol 83(3):518–522
doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6414
Olejek A, Manka G (2005) Panniculectomy in gynecologic cancer surgical procedures by using a harmonic scalpel. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84(7):690–694
doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00466.x
Stanhope CR, Winburn KA, Silverman MB (2002) Indicated noncosmetic panniculectomy in gynecologic. Surgery 8(4):197–201
Swisher ED et al (1997) Panniculectomy in the gynecologic and gynecologic oncology patient: case series and literature review. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 3(1):19–24
Singh S, Laughingwell R, Rosenblum NG (2012) Perioperative morbidity associated with medically necessary panniculectomy in gynecologic oncology surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 118(1):47–51
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.01.019
Wallace SA et al (2013) Panniculectomy and abdominoplasty in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: a single center case series of 15 combined procedures. Ann Plast Surg 71(1):88–92
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824143b7
Cosin JA et al (1994) The safety and efficacy of extensive abdominal panniculectomy at the time of pelvic surgery. Gynecol Oncol 55(1):36–40
doi: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1243
Kohorn EI (1995) Panniculectomy as an integral part of pelvic operation is an underutilized technique in patients with morbid obesity. J Am Coll Surg 180(3):279–285
pubmed: 7874337
Blomfield PI et al (1998) Panniculectomy: a useful technique for the obese patient undergoing gynecological surgery. Gynecol Oncol 70(1):80–86
doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5043
Micha JP et al (1998) “Medically necessary” panniculectomy to facilitate gynecologic cancer surgery in morbidly obese patients. Gynecol Oncol 69(3):237–242
doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.4970
Powell JL, Kasparek DK, Connor GP (1999) Panniculectomy to facilitate gynecologic surgery in morbidly obese women. Obstet Gynecol 94(4):528–531
pubmed: 10511353
Hopkins MP et al (2000) Panniculectomy at the time of gynecologic surgery in morbidly obese patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182(6):1502–1505
doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.107333
Wright JD et al (2004) Panniculectomy: improving lymph node yield in morbidly obese patients with endometrial neoplasms. Gynecol Oncol 94(2):436–441
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.035
Wright JD et al (2006) Long-term outcome of women who undergo panniculectomy at the time of gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol 102(1):86–91
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.041
Eisenhauer EL et al (2007) Comparing surgical outcomes in obese women undergoing laparotomy, laparoscopy, or laparotomy with panniculectomy for the staging of uterine malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 14(8):2384–2391
doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9440-6
Hardy JE et al (2008) The safety of pelvic surgery in the morbidly obese with and without combined panniculectomy: a comparison of results. Ann Plast Surg 60(1):10–13
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318058ad7d
Richardson DL et al (2008) Panniculectomy concurrent with anterior pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 108(2):449–451
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.10.030
El-Nashar SA et al (2010) Extended antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of surgical-site infections in morbidly obese women who undergo combined hysterectomy and medically indicated panniculectomy: a cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(3):306.e1–9
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.053
Magrina JF et al (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 109(1):86–91
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.011
Xie W et al (2016) Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142(10):2173–2183
doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2180-x
Baker WD et al (2017) Nonoperative management of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial cancer with the levonorgestrel intrauterine device in medically ill post-menopausal women. Gynecol Oncol 146(1):34–38
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.04.006
Hawkes AL et al (2014) Improving treatment for obese women with early stage cancer of the uterus: rationale and design of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device ± metformin ± weight loss in endometrial cancer (feMME) trial. Contemp Clin Trials 39(1):14–21
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.06.014