Enhancing backcross programs through increased recombination.


Journal

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
Titre abrégé: Genet Sel Evol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9114088

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 09 10 2020
accepted: 24 02 2021
entrez: 22 3 2021
pubmed: 23 3 2021
medline: 20 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Introgression of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) by successive backcrosses is used to improve elite lines (recurrent parent) by introducing alleles from exotic material (donor parent). In the absence of selection, the proportion of the donor genome decreases by half at each generation. However, since selection is for the donor allele at the QTL, elimination of the donor genome around that QTL will be much slower than in the rest of the genome (i.e. linkage drag). Using markers to monitor the genome around the QTL and in the genetic background can accelerate the return to the recurrent parent genome. Successful introgression of a locus depends partly on the occurrence of crossovers at favorable positions. However, the number of crossovers per generation is limited and their distribution along the genome is heterogeneous. Recently, techniques have been developed to modify these two recombination parameters. In this paper, we assess, by simulations in the context of Brassicaceae, the effect of increased recombination on the efficiency of introgression programs by studying the decrease in linkage drag and the recovery of the recurrent genome. The simulated selection schemes begin by two generations of foreground selection and continue with one or more generations of background selection. Our results show that, when the QTL is in a region that initially lacked crossovers, an increase in recombination rate can decrease linkage drag by nearly ten-fold after the foreground selection and improves the return to the recurrent parent. However, if the QTL is in a region that is already rich in crossovers, an increase in recombination rate is detrimental. Depending on the recombination rate in the region targeted for introgression, increasing it can be beneficial or detrimental. Thus, the simulations analysed in this paper help us understand how an increase in recombination rate can be beneficial. They also highlight the best methods that can be used to increase recombination rate, depending on the situation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Introgression of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) by successive backcrosses is used to improve elite lines (recurrent parent) by introducing alleles from exotic material (donor parent). In the absence of selection, the proportion of the donor genome decreases by half at each generation. However, since selection is for the donor allele at the QTL, elimination of the donor genome around that QTL will be much slower than in the rest of the genome (i.e. linkage drag). Using markers to monitor the genome around the QTL and in the genetic background can accelerate the return to the recurrent parent genome. Successful introgression of a locus depends partly on the occurrence of crossovers at favorable positions. However, the number of crossovers per generation is limited and their distribution along the genome is heterogeneous. Recently, techniques have been developed to modify these two recombination parameters.
RESULTS RESULTS
In this paper, we assess, by simulations in the context of Brassicaceae, the effect of increased recombination on the efficiency of introgression programs by studying the decrease in linkage drag and the recovery of the recurrent genome. The simulated selection schemes begin by two generations of foreground selection and continue with one or more generations of background selection. Our results show that, when the QTL is in a region that initially lacked crossovers, an increase in recombination rate can decrease linkage drag by nearly ten-fold after the foreground selection and improves the return to the recurrent parent. However, if the QTL is in a region that is already rich in crossovers, an increase in recombination rate is detrimental.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Depending on the recombination rate in the region targeted for introgression, increasing it can be beneficial or detrimental. Thus, the simulations analysed in this paper help us understand how an increase in recombination rate can be beneficial. They also highlight the best methods that can be used to increase recombination rate, depending on the situation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33750291
doi: 10.1186/s12711-021-00619-0
pii: 10.1186/s12711-021-00619-0
pmc: PMC7941899
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

25

Subventions

Organisme : Saclay Plant Sciences
ID : ANR-17-EUR-0007

Références

Theor Appl Genet. 2018 Aug;131(8):1627-1643
pubmed: 29728747
Genome Res. 2016 Oct;26(10):1323-1332
pubmed: 27516620
Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):783-9
pubmed: 2311922
PLoS Genet. 2011 Nov;7(11):e1002354
pubmed: 22072983
Genetics. 2002 Apr;160(4):1631-9
pubmed: 11973316
Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):205-9
pubmed: 1732161
Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1031-44
pubmed: 7713406
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Mar;132(3):575-592
pubmed: 30483818
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 6;115(10):2431-2436
pubmed: 29183972
Genetics. 2001 Jul;158(3):1363-79
pubmed: 11454782
Theor Appl Genet. 1989 Mar;77(3):353-9
pubmed: 24232612
Theor Appl Genet. 1996 Feb;92(2):191-203
pubmed: 24166168
Genome Biol. 2013;14(9):R103
pubmed: 24050704
Genes Dev. 2017 Feb 1;31(3):306-317
pubmed: 28223312
Mol Cells. 2017 Nov 30;40(11):814-822
pubmed: 29179262
Heredity (Edinb). 2012 Apr;108(4):447-55
pubmed: 22072068
Genetics. 2018 Apr;208(4):1409-1420
pubmed: 29496746
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Jul 29;360(1459):1503-11
pubmed: 16048792
Genetics. 1959 Sep;44(5):833-7
pubmed: 17247861
Genetics. 2005 Jun;170(2):909-17
pubmed: 15802512
Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):1923-32
pubmed: 8978075
Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1469-85
pubmed: 9383086
Genetics. 2016 Feb;202(2):513-23
pubmed: 26614742
Genetics. 2004 Sep;168(1):513-23
pubmed: 15454561
New Phytol. 2015 Oct;208(2):421-9
pubmed: 26255865
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 6;115(10):2437-2442
pubmed: 29463699
Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Jul;73(1):188-97
pubmed: 12772089
Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1199-210
pubmed: 1459437
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017 Apr;36:95-102
pubmed: 28258986
PLoS Genet. 2017 May 11;13(5):e1006794
pubmed: 28493942
Nat Plants. 2018 Dec;4(12):1010-1016
pubmed: 30478361
Theor Popul Biol. 2008 Mar;73(2):289-99
pubmed: 18190938
PLoS Genet. 2015 Nov 05;11(11):e1005387
pubmed: 26540184

Auteurs

Elise Tourrette (E)

Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, GQE - Le Moulon, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Matthieu Falque (M)

Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, GQE - Le Moulon, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. matthieu.falque@inrae.fr.

Olivier C Martin (OC)

Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, GQE - Le Moulon, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, Univ. Evry, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), 91405, Orsay, France.
Université de Paris, CNRS, INRAE, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), 91405, Orsay, France.

Articles similaires

Capsicum Disease Resistance Plant Diseases Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide Ralstonia solanacearum

Fine mapping of a major QTL, qECQ8, for rice taste quality.

Shan Zhu, Guoping Tang, Zhou Yang et al.
1.00
Oryza Quantitative Trait Loci Taste Chromosome Mapping Phenotype
Animals Cattle Female Fertility Gene-Environment Interaction
Gene Editing Climate Change Africa South of the Sahara Crops, Agricultural Agriculture

Classifications MeSH