Reduced scan time and superior image quality with 3D flow MRI compared to 4D flow MRI for hemodynamic evaluation of the Fontan pathway.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 03 2021
22 03 2021
Historique:
received:
11
11
2020
accepted:
03
03
2021
entrez:
23
3
2021
pubmed:
24
3
2021
medline:
16
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Long scan times prohibit a widespread clinical applicability of 4D flow MRI in Fontan patients. As pulsatility in the Fontan pathway is minimal during the cardiac cycle, acquiring non-ECG gated 3D flow MRI may result in a reduction of scan time while accurately obtaining time-averaged clinical parameters in comparison with 2D and 4D flow MRI. Thirty-two Fontan patients prospectively underwent 2D (reference), 3D and 4D flow MRI of the Fontan pathway. Multiple clinical parameters were assessed from time-averaged flow rates, including the right-to-left pulmonary flow distribution (main endpoint) and systemic-to-pulmonary collateral flow (SPCF). A ten-fold reduction in scan time was achieved [4D flow 15.9 min (SD 2.7 min) and 3D flow 1.6 min (SD 7.8 s), p < 0.001] with a superior signal-to-noise ratio [mean ratio of SNRs 1.7 (0.8), p < 0.001] and vessel sharpness [mean ratio 1.2 (0.4), p = 0.01] with 3D flow. Compared to 2D flow, good-excellent agreement was shown for mean flow rates (ICC 0.82-0.96) and right-to-left pulmonary flow distribution (ICC 0.97). SPCF derived from 3D flow showed good agreement with that from 4D flow (ICC 0.86). 3D flow MRI allows for obtaining time-averaged flow rates and derived clinical parameters in the Fontan pathway with good-excellent agreement with 2D and 4D flow, but with a tenfold reduction in scan time and significantly improved image quality compared to 4D flow.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33753790
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85936-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-85936-6
pmc: PMC7985309
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6507Références
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 May;143(5):1108-16
pubmed: 22088274
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):281-97
pubmed: 25712078
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Apr 27;14:25
pubmed: 22541134
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 May;101(5):1818-25
pubmed: 26872728
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Sep;2(5):405-11
pubmed: 19808629
Pediatr Radiol. 2016 Oct;46(11):1507-19
pubmed: 27350377
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Feb;81(2):1205-1218
pubmed: 30277276
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr;39(4):819-26
pubmed: 24395121
Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):67-75
pubmed: 23297331
Clin Res Cardiol. 2007 Mar;96(3):160-7
pubmed: 17180575
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jun 1;55(6):1202-1210
pubmed: 30590476
Circulation. 2018 May 29;137(22):2393-2407
pubmed: 29844073
Circulation. 2003 Sep 9;108(10):1227-31
pubmed: 12939218
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;7(3):215-24
pubmed: 24529885
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Jun 13;15:51
pubmed: 23763839
Heart. 2015 Jan;101(2):139-43
pubmed: 25184826
Heart. 1999 Jan;81(1):67-72
pubmed: 10220548
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Oct;136(4):820-33
pubmed: 18954618
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Feb;39(2):206-12
pubmed: 20598560
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Feb;16(2):198-209
pubmed: 25246504
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jan;141(1):207-14
pubmed: 20621314
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jul;138(1):96-102
pubmed: 19577063
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Mar 1;20(3):323-333
pubmed: 30060051
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Dec 17;20(1):85
pubmed: 30558626
Eur Heart J. 1993 Nov;14(11):1524-30
pubmed: 8299636
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 1;109(7):1038-45
pubmed: 22221948
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 May;2(3):219-25
pubmed: 19808596
Circulation. 2019 Jul 1;:CIR0000000000000696
pubmed: 31256636