Large-scale transcriptomics to dissect 2 years of the life of a fungal phytopathogen interacting with its host plant.
Brassica napus
Chromatin regulation
Effectors
Expression waves
Fungal biology
Leptosphaeria maculans
Lifestyle transitions
Pathogenesis
Transcriptomics
Journal
BMC biology
ISSN: 1741-7007
Titre abrégé: BMC Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190720
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 03 2021
23 03 2021
Historique:
received:
03
12
2020
accepted:
19
02
2021
entrez:
24
3
2021
pubmed:
25
3
2021
medline:
25
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The fungus Leptosphaeria maculans has an exceptionally long and complex relationship with its host plant, Brassica napus, during which it switches between different lifestyles, including asymptomatic, biotrophic, necrotrophic, and saprotrophic stages. The fungus is also exemplary of "two-speed" genome organisms in the genome of which gene-rich and repeat-rich regions alternate. Except for a few stages of plant infection under controlled conditions, nothing is known about the genes mobilized by the fungus throughout its life cycle, which may last several years in the field. We performed RNA-seq on samples corresponding to all stages of the interaction of L. maculans with its host plant, either alive or dead (stem residues after harvest) in controlled conditions or in field experiments under natural inoculum pressure, over periods of time ranging from a few days to months or years. A total of 102 biological samples corresponding to 37 sets of conditions were analyzed. We show here that about 9% of the genes of this fungus are highly expressed during its interactions with its host plant. These genes are distributed into eight well-defined expression clusters, corresponding to specific infection lifestyles or to tissue-specific genes. All expression clusters are enriched in effector genes, and one cluster is specific to the saprophytic lifestyle on plant residues. One cluster, including genes known to be involved in the first phase of asymptomatic fungal growth in leaves, is re-used at each asymptomatic growth stage, regardless of the type of organ infected. The expression of the genes of this cluster is repeatedly turned on and off during infection. Whatever their expression profile, the genes of these clusters are enriched in heterochromatin regions associated with H3K9me3 or H3K27me3 repressive marks. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that part of the fungal genes involved in niche adaptation is located in heterochromatic regions of the genome, conferring an extreme plasticity of expression. This work opens up new avenues for plant disease control, by identifying stage-specific effectors that could be used as targets for the identification of novel durable disease resistance genes, or for the in-depth analysis of chromatin remodeling during plant infection, which could be manipulated to interfere with the global expression of effector genes at crucial stages of plant infection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The fungus Leptosphaeria maculans has an exceptionally long and complex relationship with its host plant, Brassica napus, during which it switches between different lifestyles, including asymptomatic, biotrophic, necrotrophic, and saprotrophic stages. The fungus is also exemplary of "two-speed" genome organisms in the genome of which gene-rich and repeat-rich regions alternate. Except for a few stages of plant infection under controlled conditions, nothing is known about the genes mobilized by the fungus throughout its life cycle, which may last several years in the field.
RESULTS
We performed RNA-seq on samples corresponding to all stages of the interaction of L. maculans with its host plant, either alive or dead (stem residues after harvest) in controlled conditions or in field experiments under natural inoculum pressure, over periods of time ranging from a few days to months or years. A total of 102 biological samples corresponding to 37 sets of conditions were analyzed. We show here that about 9% of the genes of this fungus are highly expressed during its interactions with its host plant. These genes are distributed into eight well-defined expression clusters, corresponding to specific infection lifestyles or to tissue-specific genes. All expression clusters are enriched in effector genes, and one cluster is specific to the saprophytic lifestyle on plant residues. One cluster, including genes known to be involved in the first phase of asymptomatic fungal growth in leaves, is re-used at each asymptomatic growth stage, regardless of the type of organ infected. The expression of the genes of this cluster is repeatedly turned on and off during infection. Whatever their expression profile, the genes of these clusters are enriched in heterochromatin regions associated with H3K9me3 or H3K27me3 repressive marks. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that part of the fungal genes involved in niche adaptation is located in heterochromatic regions of the genome, conferring an extreme plasticity of expression.
CONCLUSION
This work opens up new avenues for plant disease control, by identifying stage-specific effectors that could be used as targets for the identification of novel durable disease resistance genes, or for the in-depth analysis of chromatin remodeling during plant infection, which could be manipulated to interfere with the global expression of effector genes at crucial stages of plant infection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33757516
doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-00989-3
pii: 10.1186/s12915-021-00989-3
pmc: PMC7986464
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fungal Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
55Subventions
Organisme : Promosol
ID : Metaphor Project
Organisme : Agence Nationale de la Recherche (FR)
ID : ANR-17-EUR-0007
Organisme : France Génomique
ID : Leptolife Project
Références
Fungal Genet Biol. 2010 Sep;47(9):736-41
pubmed: 20554054
Nat Plants. 2020 Nov;6(11):1365-1374
pubmed: 33139860
Nature. 2012 Apr 11;484(7393):186-94
pubmed: 22498624
Genome Biol Evol. 2016 Jul 03;8(6):2044-64
pubmed: 27289099
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Aug 09;8:298
pubmed: 17688688
Mol Plant. 2018 Dec 3;11(12):1427-1439
pubmed: 30336330
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40
pubmed: 19910308
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 17;9(3):e92503
pubmed: 24638039
Int J Plant Genomics. 2008;2008:619832
pubmed: 18483572
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Dec 01;7:1784
pubmed: 27990146
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 17;112(46):E6339-48
pubmed: 26578794
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2009 Jun;22(6):725-36
pubmed: 19445597
PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(11):e1003007
pubmed: 23209403
Trends Microbiol. 2009 Apr;17(4):151-7
pubmed: 19299132
Environ Microbiol. 2016 Nov;18(11):4037-4054
pubmed: 27348741
Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 1;30(7):923-30
pubmed: 24227677
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010 Aug;13(4):434-41
pubmed: 20627803
PLoS Pathog. 2015 Apr 02;11(4):e1004801
pubmed: 25837042
Fungal Genet Biol. 2013 Apr;53:50-8
pubmed: 23396262
Eukaryot Cell. 2002 Oct;1(5):719-24
pubmed: 12455691
Mol Microbiol. 2013 Jul;89(1):179-88
pubmed: 23692401
Bioinformatics. 2001 Jul;17(7):646-53
pubmed: 11448883
Mol Plant Pathol. 2018 Jul;19(7):1754-1764
pubmed: 29330918
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006 Jun;19(6):588-96
pubmed: 16776292
New Phytol. 2008;179(4):1105-20
pubmed: 18557818
mBio. 2020 Oct 6;11(5):
pubmed: 33024042
Mol Plant Pathol. 2016 Oct;17(8):1196-210
pubmed: 26679637
Theor Appl Genet. 1995 Oct;91(5):756-61
pubmed: 24169912
Trends Plant Sci. 2014 Oct;19(10):664-71
pubmed: 24999241
Mol Plant Pathol. 2007 Nov;8(6):791-802
pubmed: 20507539
New Phytol. 2019 Jul;223(1):397-411
pubmed: 30802965
New Phytol. 2013 May;198(3):887-98
pubmed: 23406519
Mol Plant Pathol. 2014 Jun;15(5):523-30
pubmed: 24279453
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2019 Apr 1;366(7):
pubmed: 30998236
Mol Microbiol. 2014 Apr;92(2):413-34
pubmed: 24571357
Electrophoresis. 2009 Dec;30(23):4118-36
pubmed: 19960477
Genome Res. 2003 Nov;13(11):2498-504
pubmed: 14597658
Mol Plant Pathol. 2015 Dec;16(9):1000-5
pubmed: 25727237
PLoS Genet. 2014 Mar 06;10(3):e1004227
pubmed: 24603691
New Phytol. 2016 Mar;209(4):1613-24
pubmed: 26592855
Ecol Evol. 2018 Dec 26;9(1):275-294
pubmed: 30680113
Microb Ecol. 2019 May;77(4):931-945
pubmed: 30834960
BMC Genomics. 2016 May 20;17:380
pubmed: 27207100
Science. 2014 Aug 22;345(6199):950-3
pubmed: 25146293
Phytochemistry. 2006 Aug;67(16):1800-7
pubmed: 16430931
Nat Commun. 2011 Feb 15;2:202
pubmed: 21326234
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007 Apr;20(4):459-70
pubmed: 17427816
Fungal Genet Biol. 2003 Jun;39(1):31-7
pubmed: 12742061
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):15-21
pubmed: 23104886
Plant Cell. 2018 Feb;30(2):300-323
pubmed: 29371439
Mol Microbiol. 2009 Feb;71(4):851-63
pubmed: 19170874
Genome Res. 2002 Apr;12(4):656-64
pubmed: 11932250
J Exp Bot. 2017 Feb 1;68(4):797-807
pubmed: 28062591
Fungal Genet Biol. 2019 Sep;130:62-71
pubmed: 31034868
Mol Plant Pathol. 2017 Oct;18(8):1113-1126
pubmed: 27474899
Mol Plant Pathol. 2016 Aug;17(6):845-59
pubmed: 26610174
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jul;40(Web Server issue):W445-51
pubmed: 22645317
Phytopathology. 2002 Oct;92(10):1122-33
pubmed: 18944223
Sci Data. 2018 Nov 06;5:180235
pubmed: 30398473
Fungal Genet Biol. 2008 Jul;45(7):1122-34
pubmed: 18538267
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:513-45
pubmed: 25923844
iScience. 2018 May 25;3:177-191
pubmed: 30428318
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 28;9(7):e103098
pubmed: 25068644
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015 Aug;26:51-6
pubmed: 26116976
New Phytol. 2016 Apr;210(2):743-61
pubmed: 26680733
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Phytopathology. 2001 Jan;91(1):70-6
pubmed: 18944280
Mol Biol Evol. 2020 Jan 1;37(1):221-239
pubmed: 31553475
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2018 Jul;31(7):695-706
pubmed: 29336199
Mol Plant Pathol. 2015 Sep;16(7):699-709
pubmed: 25492575
Life Sci Alliance. 2019 Sep 30;2(5):
pubmed: 31570514
Mol Microbiol. 2006 Apr;60(1):67-80
pubmed: 16556221
PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(4):e1002643
pubmed: 22496661
Fungal Genet Biol. 2014 Nov;72:82-90
pubmed: 24853079
Mol Plant Pathol. 2016 Oct;17(8):1289-97
pubmed: 26950404
PLoS Genet. 2013 Oct;9(10):e1003916
pubmed: 24204317
Cell Microbiol. 2015 Aug;17(8):1121-32
pubmed: 26096716
Mol Plant Pathol. 2016 Aug;17(6):818-31
pubmed: 26575525
Mol Plant. 2008 May;1(3):471-81
pubmed: 19825554
Fungal Genet Biol. 2009 Sep;46(9):695-706
pubmed: 19539773
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1611:59-73
pubmed: 28451972
Mol Plant Pathol. 2005 May 1;6(3):225-41
pubmed: 20565653
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Sep;95(6):1389-404
pubmed: 22814413
Fungal Genet Biol. 2005 Mar;42(3):257-63
pubmed: 15707846