Managing Incomplete and Complete Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures (AO Spine A3 and A4). Results from a Prospective Single-Center Study Comparing Posterior Percutaneous Instrumentation plus Mini-Open Anterolateral Fusion versus Single-Stage Posterior Instrumented Fusion.
Adult
Female
Fracture Fixation, Internal
/ adverse effects
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae
/ surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Prospective Studies
Spinal Fractures
/ surgery
Spinal Fusion
/ adverse effects
Thoracic Vertebrae
/ surgery
Anterolateral fusion
Burst fracture
Cage
Corpectomy
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS)
Pseudarthrosis
Rib graft
Thoracolumbar fracture
Titanium
Journal
World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
received:
04
01
2021
revised:
13
03
2021
accepted:
15
03
2021
pubmed:
25
3
2021
medline:
24
8
2021
entrez:
24
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The treatment strategy for thoracolumbar burst fractures is still debated. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of a 2-stage strategy with immediate posterior percutaneous instrumentation and delayed anterolateral fusion (group A) versus a single-stage open posterior instrumented fusion (group B). Demographics and clinical and surgical data of patients operated for AO Spine A3 and A4 fractures were prospectively collected. Vertebral height and deformity were evaluated before and after surgery. Visual analog scale score for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey results for quality-of-life assessment were collected during follow-up. Among the 110 patients enrolled, 66 were allocated to group A and 44 to group B; the most common fractured level was T12 (34%). Postoperative complications were higher in group B, especially the wound infection rate (18% vs. 3%), and pseudomeningocele (14% vs. 0%). The 2-stage approach allowed an average long-term gain of 15.8° at the local kyphosis of fractured vertebra and 5.8° at the regional level (Cobb angle), versus 15.4° and 5.5° in group B. At 2 years follow-up, both groups showed significant functional improvements; however, the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index metrics seemed more favorable for group A patients (P < 0.0001 vs. P < 0.003). A complete fusion rate was obtained in 100% of group A vs. 65% of group B. Our study indicates that percutaneous instrumentation and anterior fusion or an expandable cage lead to excellent long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes with a lower complication rate and higher fusion rate than those of open posterior approaches.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33757885
pii: S1878-8750(21)00439-3
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.069
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e657-e667Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.