Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser.
Ho:YAG
Holmium
Laser
Lithotripsy
Propulsion
Repulsion
Retropulsion
Stone disease
Thulium
Tm:YAG
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
03
09
2020
accepted:
13
03
2021
pubmed:
25
3
2021
medline:
29
1
2022
entrez:
24
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate retropulsion forces generated by two laser lithotripsy devices, a standard Ho:YAG and a new pulsed solid-state Thulium laser device. Two different Dornier laser devices were assessed: a Medilas H Solvo 35 and a pulsed solid-state Thulium laser evaluation model (Dornier MedTech Laser GmbH, Wessling, Germany). We used a 37 °C water bath; temperature was monitored with a thermocouple/data-logger. Representative sets of settings were examined for both devices, including short and long pulse lengths where applicable. For each setting, ten force values were recorded by a low-force precision piezo sensor whereby the laser fibre was either brought into contact with the sensor or placed at a 3 mm distance. The mean retropulsion forces resulting from the new Tm:YAG device were significantly lower than those of the Ho:YAG device under all pulse energy and frequency settings, ranging between 0.92 and 19.60 N for Thulium and 8.09-39.67 N for Holmium. The contact setups yielded lower forces than the distance setups. The forces increased with increasing pulse energy settings while shorter pulse lengths led to 12-44% higher retropulsive force in the 2.0 J/5 Hz comparisons. The Tm:YAG device not only significantly generated lower retropulsion forces in all comparisons to Holmium at corresponding settings but also offers adjustment options to achieve lower energy pulses and longer pulse durations to produce even lower retropulsion. These advantages are a promising add-on to laser lithotripsy procedures and may be highly relevant for improving laser lithotripsy performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33758959
doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03668-8
pii: 10.1007/s00345-021-03668-8
pmc: PMC8510939
doi:
Substances chimiques
Thulium
8RKC5ATI4P
Holmium
W1XX32SQN1
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3651-3656Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):969-73
pubmed: 18656905
Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Apr;50(4):333-339
pubmed: 29266385
Nat Rev Urol. 2012 Dec;9(12):691-8
pubmed: 23165399
J Healthc Eng. 2018 Mar 7;2018:8261801
pubmed: 29707187
Lasers Surg Med. 2006 Sep;38(8):762-72
pubmed: 16868932
J Urol. 2005 May;173(5):1797-800
pubmed: 15821590
J Biomed Opt. 2017 Jan 1;22(1):18001
pubmed: 28301635
Biomed Opt Express. 2018 Oct 02;9(11):5115-5128
pubmed: 30460117
J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):881-5
pubmed: 12576805
Urology. 2018 Dec;122:52-57
pubmed: 30195011
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Jul;32(5):1017-1021
pubmed: 28401347
J Endourol. 1998 Apr;12(2):183-6
pubmed: 9607447
J Endourol. 2017 Mar;31(3):272-277
pubmed: 27960541
J Biomed Opt. 2011 Jul;16(7):071403
pubmed: 21806249
J Endourol. 2005 Oct;19(8):1041-4
pubmed: 16253078
Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Nov;15(11):653-654
pubmed: 29921906
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1145-1149
pubmed: 27527803
BJU Int. 2019 Jan;123(1):113-117
pubmed: 30098120
Lasers Med Sci. 2012 May;27(3):637-43
pubmed: 22011742
J Biomech Eng. 2004 Aug;126(4):506-15
pubmed: 15543869
Urology. 2017 May;103:47-51
pubmed: 28089885
Urology. 2017 Sep;107:37-42
pubmed: 28647563
Lasers Surg Med. 2015 Jul;47(5):403-10
pubmed: 25872759