Updated results from the international phase III ALTTO trial (BIG 2-06/Alliance N063D).
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
/ mortality
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ mortality
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Survival Rate
Young Adult
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Early breast cancer
HER2
Lapatinib
Trastuzumab
Journal
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
26
10
2020
revised:
14
01
2021
accepted:
24
01
2021
pubmed:
26
3
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
25
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To present the pre-specified analyses of >5-years follow-up of the Phase III ALTTO trial. 8381 patients with stage I-III HER2 positive breast cancer randomised to chemotherapy plus 1-year of trastuzumab (T), oral lapatinib (L; no longer evaluated), trastuzumab followed by lapatinib (T→L), and lapatinib + trastuzumab (L+T). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). A secondary analysis examined DFS treatment effects by hormone receptor status, nodal status and chemotherapy timing; time to recurrence; overall survival (OS) and safety (overall and cardiac). At a median follow-up of 6.9 years, 705 DFS events for L+T versus T were observed. Hazard Ratio (HR) for DFS was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-1.00) for L+T versus T and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.81-1.08) for T→L versus T. The 6-year DFS were 85%, 84%, and 82% for L+T, T→L, and T, respectively. HR for OS was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.70-1.06) for L+T versus T and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.71-1.08) for T→L versus T. The 6-year OS were 93%, 92%, and 91% for L+T, T→L, and T, respectively. Subset analyses showed a numerically better HR for DFS in favour of L+T versus T for the hormone-receptor-negative [HR 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-1.00; 6-yr DFS% = 84% versus 80%)] and the sequential chemotherapy [HR 0.83 (95% CI, 0.69-1.00; 6-yr DFS% = 83% versus79%)] subgroups. T+L did not significantly improve DFS and OS over T alone, both with chemotherapy, and, therefore, cannot be recommended for adjuvant treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT00490139.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33765513
pii: S0959-8049(21)00092-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.01.053
pmc: PMC8103014
mid: NIHMS1686487
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00490139']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
287-296Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233329
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180821
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA232760
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180882
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233196
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180863
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233180
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
Florentine Hilbers
(F)
Sarra El-Abed
(S)
Vasiliki Balta
(V)
Celine Schurmans
(C)
Daniela D Rosa
(DD)
Kamal Saini
(K)
Otto Metzger Filho
(OM)
Robin McConnell
(R)
Vicki Paterson
(V)
Christine Campbell
(C)
Eleanor McFadden
(E)
Emma Paterson
(E)
Garrick Kassab
(G)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships that may be considered as potential competing interests:
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 20;30(21):2585-92
pubmed: 22689807
Ann Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;30(9):1507-1513
pubmed: 31240310
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Mar;12(3):236-44
pubmed: 21354370
J Clin Oncol. 2013 May 10;31(14):1726-31
pubmed: 23569315
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 10;23(23):5305-13
pubmed: 15955900
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 20;32(33):3744-52
pubmed: 25332249
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):109-19
pubmed: 22149875
Lancet. 2012 Feb 18;379(9816):633-40
pubmed: 22257673
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):724-34
pubmed: 25693012
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 20;26(18):2999-3005
pubmed: 18458039
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3138-3149
pubmed: 32678716
Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2278-84
pubmed: 23704196
Lancet. 2013 Sep 21;382(9897):1021-8
pubmed: 23871490
J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 10;33(14):1574-83
pubmed: 25779558
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Nov;14(12):1183-92
pubmed: 24095300
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1688-1700
pubmed: 29146401
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1137-46
pubmed: 25130998
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1034-42
pubmed: 26598744
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1989-95
pubmed: 22493419
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):122-131
pubmed: 28581356
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):25-32
pubmed: 22153890
J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 1;39(13):1448-1457
pubmed: 33539215
N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 28;355(26):2733-43
pubmed: 17192538
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 7;375(1):11-22
pubmed: 27406346
Clin Breast Cancer. 2021 Feb;21(1):80-91.e7
pubmed: 33183970
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1659-72
pubmed: 16236737
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1673-84
pubmed: 16236738
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6;365(14):1273-83
pubmed: 21991949