Myocardial T1 and T2 Mapping by Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Myocarditis.
Lake Louise Criteria
T1 mapping
T2 mapping
cardiovascular magnetic resonance
immune checkpoint inhibitor
major adverse cardiovascular event
myocarditis
Journal
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
ISSN: 1558-3597
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8301365
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 03 2021
30 03 2021
Historique:
received:
20
11
2020
revised:
25
01
2021
accepted:
28
01
2021
entrez:
26
3
2021
pubmed:
27
3
2021
medline:
28
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Myocarditis is a potentially fatal complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Data on the utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 and T2 mapping in ICI myocarditis are limited. This study sought to assess the value of CMR T1 and T2 mapping in patients with ICI myocarditis. In this retrospective study from an international registry of patients with ICI myocarditis, clinical and CMR findings (including T1 and T2 maps) were collected. Abnormal T1 and T2 were defined as 2 SD above site (vendor/field strength specific) reference values and a z-score was calculated for each patient. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were a composite of cardiovascular death, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and complete heart block. Of 136 patients with ICI myocarditis with a CMR, 86 (63%) had T1 maps and 79 (58%) also had T2 maps. Among the 86 patients (66.3 ± 13.1 years of age), 36 (41.9%) had a left ventricular ejection fraction <55%. Across all patients, mean z-scores for T1 and T2 values were 2.9 ± 1.9 (p < 0.001) and 2.2 ± 2.1 (p < 0.001), respectively. On Siemens 1.5-T scanner (n = 67), native T1 (1,079.0 ± 55.5 ms vs. 1,000.3 ± 22.1 ms; p < 0.001) and T2 (56.2 ± 4.9 ms vs. 49.8 ± 2.2 ms; p < 0.001) values were elevated compared with reference values. Abnormal T1 and T2 values were seen in 78% and 43% of the patients, respectively. Applying the modified Lake Louise Criteria, 95% met the nonischemic myocardial injury criteria and 53% met the myocardial edema criteria. Native T1 values had excellent discriminatory value for subsequent MACE, with an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.84 to 0.98). Native T1 values (for every 1-unit increase in z-score, hazard ratio: 1.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 1.84; p = 0.004) but not T2 values were independently associated with subsequent MACE. The use of T1 mapping and application of the modified Lake Louise Criteria provides important diagnostic value, and T1 mapping provides prognostic value in patients with ICI myocarditis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Myocarditis is a potentially fatal complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Data on the utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 and T2 mapping in ICI myocarditis are limited.
OBJECTIVES
This study sought to assess the value of CMR T1 and T2 mapping in patients with ICI myocarditis.
METHODS
In this retrospective study from an international registry of patients with ICI myocarditis, clinical and CMR findings (including T1 and T2 maps) were collected. Abnormal T1 and T2 were defined as 2 SD above site (vendor/field strength specific) reference values and a z-score was calculated for each patient. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were a composite of cardiovascular death, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and complete heart block.
RESULTS
Of 136 patients with ICI myocarditis with a CMR, 86 (63%) had T1 maps and 79 (58%) also had T2 maps. Among the 86 patients (66.3 ± 13.1 years of age), 36 (41.9%) had a left ventricular ejection fraction <55%. Across all patients, mean z-scores for T1 and T2 values were 2.9 ± 1.9 (p < 0.001) and 2.2 ± 2.1 (p < 0.001), respectively. On Siemens 1.5-T scanner (n = 67), native T1 (1,079.0 ± 55.5 ms vs. 1,000.3 ± 22.1 ms; p < 0.001) and T2 (56.2 ± 4.9 ms vs. 49.8 ± 2.2 ms; p < 0.001) values were elevated compared with reference values. Abnormal T1 and T2 values were seen in 78% and 43% of the patients, respectively. Applying the modified Lake Louise Criteria, 95% met the nonischemic myocardial injury criteria and 53% met the myocardial edema criteria. Native T1 values had excellent discriminatory value for subsequent MACE, with an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.84 to 0.98). Native T1 values (for every 1-unit increase in z-score, hazard ratio: 1.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 1.84; p = 0.004) but not T2 values were independently associated with subsequent MACE.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of T1 mapping and application of the modified Lake Louise Criteria provides important diagnostic value, and T1 mapping provides prognostic value in patients with ICI myocarditis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33766256
pii: S0735-1097(21)00250-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.050
pmc: PMC8442989
mid: NIHMS1735476
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1503-1516Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K24 HL150238
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL137562
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA229851
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA193970
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UH2 CA207355
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL130539
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P30 AI060354
Pays : United States
Organisme : CIHR
ID : FRN 147814
Pays : Canada
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr. Thavendiranathan was supported, in part, through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Investigator Award (FRN 147814) and a Canada Research Chair in Cardio-Oncology. This work is supported by the New York Academy of Medicine's Glorney-Raisbeck Award to Dr. Mahmood. Dr. Sullivan was supported, in part, through the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (RO1CA229851, UH2CA207355, RO1CA193970). Dr. C.L. Chen, and Dr. D. Gupta were supported, in part, through the NIH/National Cancer Institute P30CA008748. Dr. Neilan was supported, in part, through the Kohlberg Foundation, the NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RO1HL130539, RO1HL137562, and K24HL150238), and the NIH/Harvard Center for AIDS Research (P30 AI060354). Dr. Thavendiranathan has received Speakers Bureau fees from Amgen, Takeda, and BI. Dr. Mahmood has received consulting fees from OMR Globus, Alpha Detail, and Opinion Research Team. Dr. Nohria has received research grant support from Amgen; and has served a consultant for Takeda Oncology. Dr. Heinzerling has received consulting, advisory board, and speaker fees from MSD, BMS, Roche, Novartis, Amgen, and Curevac. Dr. Sullivan has served as a consultant for Merck and Novartis. Dr. Groarke has received research support from Amgen. Dr. Neilan has received advisory fees from Parexel, BMS, H3 Biomedicine, AbbVie, and Intrinsic Imaging. Dr. Neilan has received grant support from AstraZeneca. Dr. Wintersperger has received research support and speaker honoraria from Siemens Healthineers (the University Health Network has a master research agreement with Siemens Healthineers); and is an inventor of the IG fitting method owned by the University Health Network (US10314548B2). Dr. Yang has received research funding from CSL Behring. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 17;70(16):1964-1976
pubmed: 29025553
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jul;11(7):e007598
pubmed: 30012826
Stat Med. 1995 Aug 15;14(15):1707-23
pubmed: 7481205
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Apr 28;53(17):1475-87
pubmed: 19389557
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 18;72(24):3158-3176
pubmed: 30545455
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Mar 29;19(1):38
pubmed: 28351402
J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Feb 22;7(1):53
pubmed: 30795818
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;6(10):1048-1058
pubmed: 24011774
Eur Heart J. 2020 May 7;41(18):1733-1743
pubmed: 32112560
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Apr;8(4):414-423
pubmed: 25797123
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jun;6(6):672-83
pubmed: 23643283
Circulation. 2019 Jul 02;140(2):80-91
pubmed: 31390169
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Oct 9;19(1):75
pubmed: 28992817
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Apr 24;71(16):1755-1764
pubmed: 29567210
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan;86:6-12
pubmed: 28027767
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):
pubmed: 28213448
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jul 28;66(4):403-69
pubmed: 25553722
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;8(1):37-46
pubmed: 25499131
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jun;35(6):1067-1078
pubmed: 30756221
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Mar 15;165(6):710-8
pubmed: 17182981
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Sep;19(9):e447-e458
pubmed: 30191849
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Dec;35(12):2221-2229
pubmed: 31388815
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Dec 18;6(1):150
pubmed: 30563577
Cardiovasc Pathol. 2012 Jul-Aug;21(4):245-74
pubmed: 22137237
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020 Sep;26(6):1544-1548
pubmed: 32089073
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;4(12):1721-1728
pubmed: 30242316
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Apr 16;18:19
pubmed: 27084492
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Jun 21;14:42
pubmed: 22720998
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 11;75(5):467-478
pubmed: 32029128
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;5(1):102-10
pubmed: 22038988
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Jan;106(1):10-17
pubmed: 27388331
Circulation. 2008 Feb 5;117(5):686-97
pubmed: 18250279
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec 1;19(12):1397-1407
pubmed: 29186442
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;11(11):1583-1590
pubmed: 29454761
Eur Heart J. 2013 Sep;34(33):2636-48, 2648a-2648d
pubmed: 23824828
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009 Dec 30;11:56
pubmed: 20042111