The value of angio-CT system on splanchnic nerve neurolysis.
Journal
Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
ISSN: 1305-3612
Titre abrégé: Diagn Interv Radiol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101241152
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
27
3
2021
medline:
18
9
2021
entrez:
26
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of splanchnic nerve neurolysis (SNN) with angio-CT, a hybrid system combining computed tomography (CT) with X-ray fluoroscopy. Thirty-three SNN procedures with angio-CT performed in 30 patients with severe epigastric cancer pain (11 males and 19 females; median age, 57 years; age range, 19-79 years) between January 2010 and July 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoints were the technical success and adverse event rates. The secondary endpoints included the clinical success rate, defined as a reduction in the numerical rating scale for pain score or a decrease in the consumption of analgesics on day 1 and at 1-2 weeks after the procedure; procedure time; the number of needle punctures; amount of ethanol required; and the distribution of contrast medium in the retrocrural space. These endpoints were compared with previous studies that did not employ the angio-CT system. The technical success rate was 96.97%. There were two procedure-related adverse events (one retroperitoneal hemorrhage, one pneumothorax). The clinical success rates on day 1 and at 1-2 weeks after the procedure were 84.38% and 87.5%, respectively. The median procedure time was 60 minutes. The median number of needles used was 2. The median amount of ethanol used was 20 mL. SNN under angio-CT is safe and effective, with excellent technical and clinical success rates and acceptable adverse event rates. These results are comparable with previous studies that did not involve angio-CT. However, the use of angio-CT allows for easier needle positioning and an earlier response to complications compared with conventional methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33769290
doi: 10.5152/dir.2021.20224
pmc: PMC8136528
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
408-412Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Radiol Med. 1999 Sep;98(3):183-8
pubmed: 10575450
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996 Jan-Feb;20(1):157-60
pubmed: 8576469
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):20092-6
pubmed: 26884922
Eur J Pain. 2004 Dec;8(6):539-45
pubmed: 15531222
Radiographics. 2011 Oct;31(6):1599-621
pubmed: 21997984
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;(3):CD007519
pubmed: 21412903
Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):281-92
pubmed: 27228515
Pain. 1993 Dec;55(3):363-366
pubmed: 8121698
Br J Radiol. 2014 Sep;87(1041):20140126
pubmed: 24968749
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Feb;26(2):353-359
pubmed: 28956176
Pain Physician. 2016 Jul;19(6):397-403
pubmed: 27454270
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Feb;102(2):430-8
pubmed: 17100960
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 10;29(26):3541-6
pubmed: 21844506
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):500-6
pubmed: 20975463
Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Mar;53(3):856-60
pubmed: 17676392
Korean J Pain. 2015 Jan;28(1):22-31
pubmed: 25589943
Indian J Palliat Care. 2017 Jul-Sep;23(3):274-281
pubmed: 28827930