Imaging criteria to predict Shamblin group in carotid body tumors - revisited.
Journal
Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
ISSN: 1305-3612
Titre abrégé: Diagn Interv Radiol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101241152
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
27
3
2021
medline:
18
9
2021
entrez:
26
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aims to compare the imaging findings of carotid body tumors on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) with the intraoperative Shamblin grade and to evolve an imaging-based scoring system that can accurately predict the Shamblin grade. Preoperative contrast-enhanced CT scans of 40 patients who underwent surgical excision of carotid body tumors in our institution between 2004 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The angle of contact with the internal carotid artery (ICA), tumor volume, presence of peritumoral tuft of veins, loss of tumor adventitia interface and distance from the skull base were assessed and compared with the intraoperative Shamblin grades of the tumor. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine which parameters could be predictors of the Shamblin grades. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to score the tumor volumes. Among the 42 tumors evaluated, 6 (14.3%) were surgically classified as Shamblin I, 15 (35.7%) as Shamblin II, and 21 (50%) as Shamblin III tumors. Pairwise comparison between the three Shamblin groups showed a statistically significant difference for angle of contact with ICA, maximum tumor dimension, presence of peritumoral tuft of veins and loss of tumor adventitia interface (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.038 and p = 0.003, respectively). However, tumor volumes and distance from skull base were not significantly different between the Shamblin groups (p = 0.136 and p = 0.682). A scoring system, including four of the above mentioned parameters (angle of contact with ICA, tumor volume, presence of peritumoral tuft of veins, and loss of tumor adventitia interface) was developed with a maximum score of 8 and a minimum of 2. A statistically significant difference was found between the final scores among the three Shamblin groups (p < 0.001). Using ROC curves, a final score of ≥6 was found to separate Shamblin grade III tumors from grade I and II tumors (sensitivity, 95.24%; specificity, 71.43%). All patients with documented intraoperative estimated blood loss of >1000 mL had Shamblin grade III tumors. Postoperative complications like stroke, ICA thrombosis and lower cranial nerve palsies were seen only with Shamblin grade II and III tumors. The simple scoring system we have proposed correlates well with the Shamblin grade and helps in identifying patients who have a higher risk of developing complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33769292
doi: 10.5152/dir.2021.20028
pmc: PMC8136543
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
354-359Références
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Aug;29(7):1349-54
pubmed: 18417602
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Oct;56(4):979-89
pubmed: 22727841
Oral Oncol. 2004 Jul;40(6):563-75
pubmed: 15063383
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(6):1673-1679
pubmed: 28527929
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006 Aug;391(4):396-402
pubmed: 16680477
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015 Apr;35(2):88-92
pubmed: 26019391
Acta Chir Belg. 2008 Jan-Feb;108(1):107-11
pubmed: 18411584
Am J Surg. 1971 Dec;122(6):732-9
pubmed: 5127724
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Jun;3(2):91-5
pubmed: 20607078
Ann Vasc Dis. 2014;7(3):292-9
pubmed: 25298832
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001 Oct;34(5):907-24, vi
pubmed: 11557446
Am J Surg. 2006 Jan;191(1):104-10
pubmed: 16399116
G Chir. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1-2):47-51
pubmed: 24690341
Neuroradiology. 2018 Dec;60(12):1281-1286
pubmed: 30203174
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Feb;263(2):171-5
pubmed: 16010570
Ann Surg. 2008 May;247(5):877-84
pubmed: 18438127
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Nov;93(8):596-602
pubmed: 22041235
Radiographics. 1999 Nov-Dec;19(6):1605-32
pubmed: 10555678
Head Neck Pathol. 2009 Dec;3(4):303-6
pubmed: 20016787