Clinical relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: when negative amylase levels tell the truth.
Journal
Updates in surgery
ISSN: 2038-3312
Titre abrégé: Updates Surg
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101539818
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
11
05
2020
accepted:
02
03
2021
pubmed:
27
3
2021
medline:
16
10
2021
entrez:
26
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Drain Amylase level are routinely determined to diagnose pancreatic fistula after Pancreatocoduodenectomy. Consensus is lacking regarding the cut-off value of amylase to diagnosis clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulae (POPF). The present study proposes a model based on Amylase Value in the Drain (AVD) measured in the first three postoperative days to predict a POPF. Amylase cut-offs were selected from a previous published systematic review and the accuracy were validated in a multicentre database from 12 centres in 2 countries. The present study defined POPF the 2016 ISGPS criteria (3 times the upper limit of normal serum amylase). A learning machine method was used to correlate AVD with the diagnosis of POPF. Overall, 454 (27%) of 1638 patients developed POPF. Machine learning excluded a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulae with an AUC of 0.962 (95% CI 0.940-0.984) in the first five postoperative days. An AVD at a cut-off of 270 U/L in 2 days in the first three postoperative days excluded a POPF with an AUC of 0.869 (CI 0.81-0.90, p < 0.0001). A single AVD in the first three postoperative days may not exclude POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy. The levels should be monitored until day 3 and have two negative values before removing the drain. In the group with a positive level, the drain should be kept in and AVD monitored until postoperative day five.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33770412
doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01020-8
pii: 10.1007/s13304-021-01020-8
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amylases
EC 3.2.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1391-1397Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).
Références
Adachi E, Harimoto N, Yamashita Y et al (2013) Pancreatic leakage test in pancreaticoduodenectomy: relation to degree of pancreatic fibrosis, pancreatic amylase level and pancreatic fistula. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 104(12):490–498
Chen JY, Feng J, Wang XQ, Cai SW, Dong JH, Chen YL (2015) Risk scoring system and predictor for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol WJG 21(19):5926–5933
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5926
Molinari E, Bassi C, Salvia R et al (2007) Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula: results of a prospective study in 137 patients. Ann Surg 246(2):281–287
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180caa42f
Shamali A, Shelat V, Jaber B et al (2017) Impact of obesity on short and long term results following a pancreatico-duodenectomy. Int J Surg (London, England) 42:191–196
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.04.058
Shamali A, McCrudden R, Bhandari P et al (2016) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for nonampullary duodenal lesions: indications and results. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28(12):1388–1393
doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000738
Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E et al (2009) Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg 197(6):702–709
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.004
Abu Hilal M, Malik HZ, Hamilton-Burke W, Verbeke C, Menon KV (2009) Modified Cattell’s pancreaticojejunostomy, buttressing for soft pancreases and an isolated biliopancreatic loop are safety measurements that improve outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a pilot study. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 11(2):154–160
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00028.x
Dugalic VD, Knezevic DM, Obradovic VN et al (2014) Drain amylase value as an early predictor of pancreatic fistula after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy. World J Gastroenterol WJG 20(26):8691–8699
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8691
Kawai M, Kondo S, Yamaue H et al (2011) Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(4):601–608
doi: 10.1007/s00534-011-0373-x
Facy O, Chalumeau C, Poussier M, Binquet C, Rat P, Ortega-Deballon P (2012) Diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Br J Surg 99(8):1072–1075
doi: 10.1002/bjs.8774
Kong J, Gananadha S, Hugh TJ, Samra JS (2008) Pancreatoduodenectomy: role of drain fluid analysis in the management of pancreatic fistula. ANZ J Surg 78(4):240–244
doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04428.x
Cirocchi R, Graziosi L, Sanguinetti A et al (2015) Can the measurement of amylase in drain after distal pancreatectomy predict post-operative pancreatic fistula? Int J Surg (London, England) 21(Suppl 1):S30–S33
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.048
Fong ZV, Fernandez-Del CC (2016) Early drain amylase value predicts the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 266:e80
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001690
Israel JS, Rettammel RJ, Leverson GE et al (2014) Does postoperative drain amylase predict pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy? J Am Coll Surg 218(5):978–987
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.048
Yamaguchi M, Nakano H, Midorikawa T, Yoshizawa Y, Sanada Y, Kumada K (2003) Prediction of pancreatic fistula by amylase levels of drainage fluid on the first day after pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 50(52):1155–1158
Caputo D, Angeletti S, Ciccozzi M et al (2020) Role of drain amylase levels assay and routinary postoperative day 3 abdominal CT scan in prevention of complications and management of surgical drains after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Updat Surg 72(3):727–741
doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00784-9
Denbo JW, Orr WS, Zarzaur BL, Behrman SW (2012) Toward defining grade C pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 14(9):589–593
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00486.x
Lim C, Dokmak S, Cauchy F, Aussilhou B, Belghiti J, Sauvanet A (2013) Selective policy of no drain after pancreaticoduodenectomy is a valid option in patients at low risk of pancreatic fistula: a case-control analysis. World J Surg 37(5):1021–1027
doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1947-3
Vallance AE, Young AL, Macutkiewicz C, Roberts KJ, Smith AM (2015) Calculating the risk of a pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 17(11):1040–1048
doi: 10.1111/hpb.12503
Davidson TB, Yaghoobi M, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS (2017) Amylase in drain fluid for the diagnosis of pancreatic leak in post-pancreatic resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD012009
Giglio MC, Spalding DR, Giakoustidis A et al (2016) Meta-analysis of drain amylase content on postoperative day 1 as a predictor of pancreatic fistula following pancreatic resection. Br J Surg 103(4):328–336
doi: 10.1002/bjs.10090
Lu X, Wang X, Fang Y et al (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of pancreatic amylase value on postoperative day 1 after pancreatic resection to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(5):e2569
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002569
Giovinazzo F, Butturini G, Salvia R et al (2011) Drain management after pancreatic resection: state of the art. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(6):779–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0431-4
doi: 10.1007/s00534-011-0431-4
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
Kambakamba P, Mannil M, Herrera PE et al (2020) The potential of machine learning to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula based on preoperative, non-contrast-enhanced CT: a proof-of-principle study. Surgery 167(2):448–454
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.09.019
Janik M, Bossew P, Kurihara O (2018) Machine learning methods as a tool to analyse incomplete or irregularly sampled radon time series data. Sci Total Environ 630:1155–1167
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.233
Bertens KA, Crown A, Clanton J et al (2017) What is a better predictor of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD): postoperative day one drain amylase (POD1DA) or the fistula risk score (FRS)? HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc 19(1):75–81
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.10.001
Partelli S, Tamburrino D, Crippa S, Facci E, Zardini C, Falconi M (2014) Evaluation of a predictive model for pancreatic fistula based on amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection. Am J Surg 208(4):634–639
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.03.011
Tsujie M, Nakamori S, Miyamoto A et al (2012) Risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy - patients with low drain amylase level on postoperative day 1 are safe from developing pancreatic fistula. Hepatogastroenterology 59(120):2657–2660
Mungroop TH, van Rijssen LB, van Klaveren D et al (2019) Alternative Fistula Risk Score for Pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): Design and International External Validation. Ann Surg 269(5):937–943. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002620
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002620
Linnemann RJA, Patijn GA, van Rijssen LB et al (2019) The role of abdominal drainage in pancreatic resection—a multicenter validation study for early drain removal. Pancreatology 19(6):888–896
doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.07.041