Estrogen receptor β and treatment with a phytoestrogen are associated with inhibition of nuclear translocation of EGFR in the prostate.
Active Transport, Cell Nucleus
/ drug effects
Androgen Antagonists
/ pharmacology
Androstenes
/ pharmacology
Animals
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ pharmacology
Benzamides
/ pharmacology
Biopsy
Cell Nucleus
/ drug effects
Cohort Studies
ErbB Receptors
/ metabolism
Estrogen Receptor beta
/ agonists
Finasteride
/ pharmacology
Humans
Male
Mice
Mice, Knockout
Neoplasm Grading
Nitriles
/ pharmacology
PTEN Phosphohydrolase
/ metabolism
Phenylthiohydantoin
/ pharmacology
Phytoestrogens
/ pharmacology
Prostate
/ cytology
Prostatic Hyperplasia
/ drug therapy
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Receptors, Androgen
/ metabolism
Receptors, Estrogen
/ genetics
ADT
EGFR
PTEN
nuclear receptor
prostate cancer
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 03 2021
30 03 2021
Historique:
entrez:
27
3
2021
pubmed:
28
3
2021
medline:
25
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Knockout of ERβ in the mouse leads to nuclear expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in the prostate. To examine whether ERβ plays a similar role in the human prostate, we used four cohorts of men: 1) a Swedish cohort of normal prostates and PCa (prostate cancer) of different Gleason grades; 2) men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with the 5α-reductase inhibitor, finasteride, and finasteride together with the ERβ agonists, soy isoflavones; 3) men with PCa above Gleason grade 4 (GG4), treated with ADT (androgen deprivation therapy) and abiraterone (AA), the blocker of androgen synthesis for different durations; and 4) men with GG4 PCa on ADT or ADT with the AR (androgen receptor) blocker, enzalutamide, for 4 mo to 6 mo. In men with BPH, finasteride treatment induced EGFR nuclear expression, but, when finasteride was combined with isoflavones, EGFR remained on the cell membrane. In GG4 patients, blocking of AR for 4 mo to 6 mo resulted in loss of ERβ and PTEN expression and increase in patients with nuclear EGFR from 10 to 40%. In the men with GG4 PCa, blocking of adrenal synthesis of testosterone for 2 mo to 7 mo had the beneficial effect of increasing ERβ expression, but, on treatment longer than 8 mo, ERβ was lost and EGFR moved to the nucleus. Since nuclear EGFR is a predictor of poor outcome in PCa, addition of ERβ agonists together with abiraterone should be considered as a treatment that might sustain expression of ERβ and offer some benefit to patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33771918
pii: 2011269118
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011269118
pmc: PMC8020780
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
AR protein, human
0
Androgen Antagonists
0
Androstenes
0
Benzamides
0
ESR2 protein, human
0
Esrrb protein, mouse
0
Estrogen Receptor beta
0
Nitriles
0
Phytoestrogens
0
Receptors, Androgen
0
Receptors, Estrogen
0
Phenylthiohydantoin
2010-15-3
Finasteride
57GNO57U7G
enzalutamide
93T0T9GKNU
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
EGFR protein, mouse
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
PTEN Phosphohydrolase
EC 3.1.3.67
PTEN protein, human
EC 3.1.3.67
abiraterone
G819A456D0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interest.
Références
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 29;5(11):e14110
pubmed: 21124760
Cancer Res. 2017 Jan 1;77(1):74-85
pubmed: 27793843
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 3;117(9):4902-4909
pubmed: 32075916
Breast Cancer Res. 2011 Apr 14;13(2):R43
pubmed: 21492444
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 28;103(48):18350-5
pubmed: 17110437
Cancer Cell. 2010 Apr 13;17(4):319-32
pubmed: 20385358
Discov Med. 2011 Nov;12(66):419-32
pubmed: 22127113
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1096:1-30
pubmed: 30324345
Lung Cancer. 2013 Jul;81(1):138-41
pubmed: 23628526
Exp Cell Res. 2003 Mar 10;284(1):31-53
pubmed: 12648464
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Feb;14(2):149-58
pubmed: 23306100
Ther Adv Urol. 2017 Mar 01;9(3-4):73-80
pubmed: 28392836
Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 16;14(6):R148
pubmed: 23158001
Cell Death Dis. 2019 Jul 15;10(8):540
pubmed: 31308358
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 18;12(12):e0189087
pubmed: 29253018
J Urol. 2015 Feb;193(2):491-9
pubmed: 25444753
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 26;110(9):3543-8
pubmed: 23401502
Cancer Res. 2011 Feb 1;71(3):1103-14
pubmed: 21266349
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 9;114(19):E3816-E3822
pubmed: 28439009
Oncogene. 2014 Aug 14;33(33):4213-25
pubmed: 24077289
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 24;106(8):2859-63
pubmed: 19196965
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Feb;2(2):127-37
pubmed: 11252954
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):470-9
pubmed: 25306226
Cancer Lett. 2018 May 28;422:81-93
pubmed: 29477380
Eur Urol. 2018 Feb;73(2):178-211
pubmed: 28655541
Am J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec;33(6):609-13
pubmed: 20042973
Oncogene. 2012 Nov 1;31(44):4689-97
pubmed: 22266872
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997 Dec;82(12):4258-65
pubmed: 9398750
Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:137-51
pubmed: 26331999
Vitam Horm. 2018;108:309-331
pubmed: 30029732
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 15;11(16):5856-62
pubmed: 16115926
Am J Pathol. 2004 Jun;164(6):2003-12
pubmed: 15161636
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 26;6:32198
pubmed: 27561382
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1502-12
pubmed: 15470213
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020 Mar 2;10(3):
pubmed: 31636093
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Jun 2;344(2):540-6
pubmed: 16630558
Am J Pathol. 2013 Jun;182(6):1942-9
pubmed: 23570837
Oncotarget. 2017 May 23;8(21):34971-34979
pubmed: 28380417
Prostate. 2020 May;80(6):527-544
pubmed: 32130741
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Sep;108(3):370-7
pubmed: 23830194
Oncol Lett. 2019 Feb;17(2):1551-1558
pubmed: 30675212
J Cancer. 2017 Mar 12;8(5):903-912
pubmed: 28382154
Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Mar;44(1):50-6
pubmed: 22500161
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 15;99(21):13589-94
pubmed: 12370428
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5925-30
pubmed: 8650195
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593