Implementation Science: Application of Evidence-Based Practice Models to Improve Healthcare Quality.
evidence-based practice
framework
implementation science
implementation strategies
model
model selection
Journal
Worldviews on evidence-based nursing
ISSN: 1741-6787
Titre abrégé: Worldviews Evid Based Nurs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101185267
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
28
01
2021
accepted:
01
02
2021
pubmed:
30
3
2021
medline:
16
9
2021
entrez:
29
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Translating research into practice is complex for clinicians, yet essential for high quality patient care. The field of implementation science evolved to address this gap by developing theoretical approaches to guide adoption and sustained implementation of practice changes. Clinicians commonly lack knowledge, time, and resources of how evidence-based practice (EBP) models can guide implementation, contributing to the knowledge-to-practice gap. This paper aimed to equip clinicians and other healthcare professionals with implementation science knowledge, confidence, and models to facilitate EBP change in their local setting and ultimately improve healthcare quality, safety, and population health outcomes. The field of implementation science is introduced, followed by application of three select models. Models are applied to a clinical scenario to emphasize contextual factors, process, implementation strategies, and outcome evaluation. Key attributes, strengths, opportunities, and utilities of each model are presented, along with general resources for selecting and using published criteria to best fit clinical needs. Partnerships between implementation scientists and clinicians are highlighted to facilitate the uptake of evidence into practice. Knowledge of implementation science can help clinicians adopt high-quality evidence into their practices. Application-oriented approaches can guide clinicians through the EBP processes. Clinicians can partner with researchers in advancing implementation science to continue to accelerate the adoption of evidence and reduce the knowledge-to-action gap.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Translating research into practice is complex for clinicians, yet essential for high quality patient care. The field of implementation science evolved to address this gap by developing theoretical approaches to guide adoption and sustained implementation of practice changes. Clinicians commonly lack knowledge, time, and resources of how evidence-based practice (EBP) models can guide implementation, contributing to the knowledge-to-practice gap.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
This paper aimed to equip clinicians and other healthcare professionals with implementation science knowledge, confidence, and models to facilitate EBP change in their local setting and ultimately improve healthcare quality, safety, and population health outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
The field of implementation science is introduced, followed by application of three select models. Models are applied to a clinical scenario to emphasize contextual factors, process, implementation strategies, and outcome evaluation. Key attributes, strengths, opportunities, and utilities of each model are presented, along with general resources for selecting and using published criteria to best fit clinical needs. Partnerships between implementation scientists and clinicians are highlighted to facilitate the uptake of evidence into practice.
LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION
CONCLUSIONS
Knowledge of implementation science can help clinicians adopt high-quality evidence into their practices. Application-oriented approaches can guide clinicians through the EBP processes. Clinicians can partner with researchers in advancing implementation science to continue to accelerate the adoption of evidence and reduce the knowledge-to-action gap.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
76-84Informations de copyright
© 2021 Sigma Theta Tau International.
Références
Balas, E. A., & Boren, S. A. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 1, 65-70.
Barrimore, S. E., Cameron, A. E., Young, A. M., Hickman, I. J., & Campbell, K. L. (2020). Translating research into practice: How confident are allied health clinicians? Journal of Allied Health, 49(4), 258-262.
Bergström, A., Ehrenberg, A., Eldh, A. C., Graham, I. D., Gustafsson, K., Harvey, G., & Wallin, L. (2020). The use of the PARIHS Framework in implementation research and practice-A citation analysis of the literature. Implementation Science, 15(1), 1-51.
Borsky, A., Zhan, C., Miller, T., Ngo-Metzger, Q., Bierman, A. S., & Meyers, D. (2018). Few Americans receive all high-priority, appropriate clinical preventive services. Health Affairs, 37(6), 925-928.
Braithwaite, J., Marks, D., & Taylor, N. (2014). Harnessing implementation science to improve care quality and patient safety: A systematic review of targeted literature. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 26(3), 321-329.
Cullen, L., & Adams, S. (2012). Planning for implementation of evidence-based practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(4), 222-230.
Cullen, L., Edmonds, S., Reisinger, H., Hanrahan, K., & Wagner, M. (2020). A study to determine external validity of the Iowa Implementation for Sustainability Framework. Paper presented at 13th annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation Health, Academy Health, Washington, DC.
Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Farrington, M., Deberg, J., Tucker, S., & Kleiber, C. (2018). Evidence-based practice in action: Comprehensive strategies, tools, and tips from the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.
Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Tucker, S., & Gallagher-Ford, L. (2019). Data driven precision implementation approach. American Journal of Nursing, 119(8), 60-63.
Dang, D., & Dearholt, S. (2017). Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: Model and guidelines, 3rd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.
Dissemination & Implementation Models in Health Research and Practice. (2020). Retrieved from https://dissemination-implementation.org/search_di.aspx
Eccles, M. P., & Mittman, B. S. (2006). Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1
Gawlinski, A., & Rutledge, D. (2008). Selecting a model for evidence-based practice changes: A practical approach. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 19(3), 291-300.
Gorsuch, P. F., Gallagher-Ford, L., Thomas, B. K., Melnyk, B. M., & Connor, L. (2020). Impact of a formal educational skill-building program based on the ARCC Model to enhance evidence-based practice competency in nurse teams. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(4), 258-268.
Grol, R., Wensing, M., Eccles, M., & Davis, D. (2013). Improving patient care: The implementation of change in health care, 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell.
Harvey, G., & Kitson, A. (2015). PARIHS revisited: From heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implementation Science, 11(1), 1-13.
Harvey, G., & Kitson, A. (2016). PARIHS revisited: From heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implementation Science, 11(33), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0398-2
Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare (2020). EBP implementation and sustainability toolkit. Retrieved from https://fuld.nursing.osu.edu/news/ebp-implementation-and-sustainability-toolkit-released-ebp-hq-members
Hunter, S. C., Kim, B., Mudge, A., Hall, L., Young, A., McRae, P., & Kitson, A. L. (2020). Experiences of using the i-PARIHS Framework: A co-designed case study of four multi-site implementation projects. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1-14.
Implementation Science Exchange. (2020). Theory, Model and Framework Comparison and Selection Tool (T-CaST). Retrieved from https://impsci.tracs.unc.edu/tcast/
Iowa Model Collaborative. (2017). Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice: Revisions and validation. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(3), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12223
Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998). Enabling the implementation of evidence-based practice: A conceptual framework. BMJ Quality & Safety, 7(3), 149-158.
Levin, R. F., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Barnes, M., & Vetter, M. J. (2011). Fostering evidence-based practice to improve nurse and cost outcomes in a community health setting: A pilot test of the Advancing Research and Clinical practice through close Collaboration Model. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 21-33.
Li, S., Jeffs, L., Barwick, M., & Stevens, B. (2018). Organizational contextual features that influence the implementation of evidence-based practices across healthcare settings: A systematic integrative review. Systematic Reviews, 7(72), 1-19.
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2002). Putting research into practice. Rochester ARCC. Reflections on Nursing Leadership, 28(2), 22-25.
Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Giggleman, M., & Choy, K. (2017). A test of the ARCC© Model improves implementation of evidence-based practice, healthcare culture, and patient outcomes. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12189
Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., & Mays, M. Z. (2008). The evidence-based practice beliefs and implementation scales: Psychometric properties of two new instruments. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 5(4), 208-216.
Mitchell, S. A., Fisher, C. A., Hastings, C. E., Silverman, L. B., & Wallen, G. R. (2010). A thematic analysis of theoretical models for translational science in nursing: Mapping the field. Nursing Outlook, 58(6), 287-300.
Moullin, J. C., Sabater-Hernandez, D., Fernandez-Llimos, F., & Benrimoj, S. I. (2015). A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework. Health Research Policy and Systems, 13, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0005-z
Nilsen, P. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science, 10(53), 1-13.
Nilsen, P., & Bernhardsson, S. (2019). Context matters in implementation science: A scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Services Research, 19, 189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4015-3
Powell, B. J., Fernandez, M. E., Williams, N. J., Aarons, G. A., Beidas, R. S., Lewis, C. C., … Weiner, B. J. (2019). Enhancing the impact of implementation strategies in healthcare: A research agenda. Frontiers in Public Health, 7(3), 1-9.
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. New York, NY: Free Press.
Tucker, S., Zadvinskis, I. M., & Connor, L. (2020). Development and psychometric testing of the Implementation Self-Efficacy for EBP (ISE4EBP) Scale. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 43(1), 45-52.
Wallen, G. R., Mitchell, S. A., Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Miller-Davis, C., Yates, J., & Hastings, C. (2010). Implementing evidence-based practice: Effectiveness of a structured multifaceted mentorship program. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(12), 2761-2771.
Watson, C. A., Bulechek, G. M., & McCloskey, J. C. (1987). QAMUR: A quality assurance model using research. Journal of Nursing Quality Assurance, 2(1), 21-27.
Weng, Y.-H., Kuo, K. N., Yang, C.-Y., Lo, H.-L., Chen, C., & Chiu, Y.-W. (2013). Implementation of evidence-based practice across medical, nursing, pharmacological and allied healthcare professionals: A questionnaire survey in nationwide hospital settings. Implementation Science, 8(112), 1-10.
Wensing, M., & Grol, R. (2019). Knowledge translation in health: How implementation science could contribute more. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1322-9