Expansion of a direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States and experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal
/ therapeutic use
Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal
/ therapeutic use
Abortion, Induced
/ methods
Adolescent
Adult
COVID-19
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Mifepristone
/ therapeutic use
Misoprostol
/ therapeutic use
Postal Service
Pregnancy
SARS-CoV-2
Telemedicine
/ methods
United States
Young Adult
COVID-19
Mail
Medical abortion
Telemedicine
United States
Journal
Contraception
ISSN: 1879-0518
Titre abrégé: Contraception
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0234361
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
received:
01
02
2021
revised:
10
03
2021
accepted:
18
03
2021
pubmed:
31
3
2021
medline:
13
7
2021
entrez:
30
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To present updated evidence on the safety, efficacy and acceptability of a direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service and describe how the service functioned during the COVID-19 pandemic. We offered the study at 10 sites that provided the service in 13 states and Washington DC. Interested individuals obtained any needed preabortion tests locally and had a videoconference with a study clinician. Sites sent study packages containing mifepristone and misoprostol by mail and had remote follow-up consultations within one month by telephone (or by online survey, if the participant could not be reached) to evaluate abortion completeness. The analysis was descriptive. We mailed 1390 packages between May 2016 and September 2020. Of the 83% (1157/1390) of abortions for which we obtained outcome information, 95% (1103/1157) were completed without a procedure. Participants made 70 unplanned visits to emergency rooms or urgent care centers for reasons related to the abortion (6%), and 10 serious adverse events occurred, including 5 transfusions (0.4%). Enrollment increased substantially with the onset of COVID-19. Although a screening ultrasound was required, sites determined in 52% (346/669) of abortions that occurred during COVID that those participants should not get the test to protect their health. Use of urine pregnancy test to confirm abortion completion increased from 67% (144/214) in the 6 months prior to COVID to 90% (602/669) in the 6 months during COVID. Nearly all satisfaction questionnaires (99%, 1013/1022) recorded that participants were satisfied with the service. This direct-to-patient telemedicine service was safe, effective, and acceptable, and supports the claim that there is no medical reason for mifepristone to be dispensed in clinics as required by the Food and Drug Administration. In some cases, participants did not need to visit any facilities to obtain the service, which was critical to protecting patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical abortion using telemedicine and mail is effective and can be safely provided without a pretreatment ultrasound. This method of service delivery has the potential to greatly improve access to abortion care in the United States.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33781762
pii: S0010-7824(21)00091-3
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.019
pmc: PMC9748604
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal
0
Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal
0
Misoprostol
0E43V0BB57
Mifepristone
320T6RNW1F
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
43-48Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : K12 HD085809
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Contraception. 2019 May;99(5):265-266
pubmed: 30867121
BJOG. 2019 Aug;126(9):1094-1102
pubmed: 30869829
Contraception. 2018 Apr;97(4):292-296
pubmed: 29170088
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;134(2):343-350
pubmed: 31306317
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Oct;46(4):241-243
pubmed: 32788180
Contracept X. 2020 Nov 21;2:100049
pubmed: 33305255
Contraception. 2019 Sep;100(3):173-177
pubmed: 31170384
BJOG. 2019 Apr;126(5):609-618
pubmed: 30456778
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):835-837
pubmed: 32701762
Contraception. 2020 Jun;101(6):361-366
pubmed: 32305289
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):12-21
pubmed: 26241251
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Jul;46(3):172-176
pubmed: 32665231
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):371-382
pubmed: 31977782
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jan;103(1):73-8
pubmed: 23153158
Contraception. 2021 Mar;103(3):151-156
pubmed: 33359507
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Sep - Oct;29(5):407-413
pubmed: 31109883