Benefits of mitral valve repair over replacement in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
elderly
meta-analysis
mitral valve
mitral valve repair
Journal
Journal of cardiac surgery
ISSN: 1540-8191
Titre abrégé: J Card Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8908809
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
13
01
2021
accepted:
09
02
2021
pubmed:
31
3
2021
medline:
11
6
2021
entrez:
30
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mitral valve (MV) repair has demonstrated excellent short- and long-term outcomes, however, its merit in the elderly population is still debated. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies that have compared the MV repair to replacement in the elderly population. A systematic literature search was conducted for any study published on MV surgery on elderly patients (≥75 years old). A pooled risk-ratio meta-analysis was done to evaluate short-term mortality, postoperative complications, surgical timings, and long-term survival rates. A total of nine retrospective observational studies were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Pooled meta-analysis showed a reduced risk of short-term mortality for the MV repair group (risk ratio [RR] = 0.41 [0.24-0.71], p-value = .005). Postoperative neurological complications were in favor of repair, although not significantly (RR = 0.49 [0.21-1.11], p-value = .07). Operative timings (cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp time) were not different between the groups although no data were available on the complexity of the repairs. Long-term survival rates were in favor of the repairs (pooled treatment effect of -0.47 [-0.64; -0.29], p = .005). MV surgery is a safe and effective procedure for the elderly. MV repair demonstrated better short-term outcomes compared to replacement. Long-term survival rates are significantly better after repair.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2524-2530Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Cardiac Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Ghoreishi M, Dawood MY, Gammie JS. Mitral valve surgery in elderly patients with mitral regurgitation: repair or replacement with tissue valve? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2013;28(2):164-169.
Eurostat. Ageing Europe-statistics on population developments. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Population_structure_and_ageing
Pratesi A, Orso F, Ghiara C, et al. Cardiac surgery in the elderly: what goals of care? Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2017;87(2):12-15.
Taramasso M, Gaemperli O, Maisano F. Treatment of degenerative mitral regurgitation in elderly patients. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(3):177-183.
Farid S, Ladwiniec A, Hernández-Sánchez J, et al. Early outcomes after mitral valve repair versus replacement in the elderly: a propensity matched analysis. Hear Lung Circ. 2019;28(2):314-319.
Suri RM, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, et al. Survival advantage and improved durability of mitral repair for leaflet prolapse subsets in the current era. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(3):819-826.
Vassileva CM, Mishkel G, McNeely C, et al. Long-term survival of patients undergoing mitral valve repair and replacement: a longitudinal analysis of medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Circulation. 2013;127(18):1870-1876.
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):135.
Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8:1-16.
Chikwe J, Goldstone AB, Passage J, et al. A propensity score-adjusted retrospective comparison of early and mid-term results of mitral valve repair versus replacement in octogenarians. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(5):618-626.
Silaschi M, Chaubey S, Aldalati O, et al. Is mitral valve repair superior to mitral valve replacement in elderly patients? comparison of short-and long-term outcomes in a propensity-matched cohort. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(8):10-12.
Ailawadi G, Swenson BR, Girotti ME, et al. Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement in elderly patients? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(1):77-86.
Seese LM, Sultan I, Gleason TG, et al. Outcomes of mitral valve repair versus replacement in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109(4):1202-1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.057
Chivasso P, Bruno VD, Farid S, et al. Predictors of survival in octogenarians after mitral valve surgery for degenerative disease: the Mitral Surgery in Octogenarians study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(4):1474-1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.027
Nloga J, Hénaine R, Vergnat M, et al. Mitral valve surgery in octogenarians: Should we fight for repair? A survival and quality-of-life assessment. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2011;39(6):875-880.
DiGregorio V, Zehr KJ, Orszulak TA, et al. Results of mitral surgery in octogenarians with isolated nonrheumatic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(3):807-813.
Goldsmith I, Lip GY, Kaukuntla H, Patel RL. Hospital morbidity and mortality and changes in quality of life following mitral valve surgery in the elderly. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;8:702-707.
Kang DH, Heo R, Lee S, et al. Initial surgery versus conservative management of symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation in the elderly. Heart. 2018;104(10):849-854.
Shang X, Lu R, Liu M, Xiao S, Dong N. Mitral valve repair versus replacement in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(9):3045-3051.
Bruno VD, Chivasso P, Hayat A, et al. Propensity-matched analysis of outcomes after mitral valve surgery between trainees and consultants (institutional report). Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;26(3):443-447.
Medved I, Anić D, Oštrić M, Zrnić B, Ivančić A, Tomulić V. Is mitral valve repair safe procedure in elderly patients? Coll Antropol. 2010;34(SUPPL. 2):213-215.
McNeely C, Vassileva C. Long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair versus replacement for degenerative disease: a systematic review. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2014;11(2):157-162.