Sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison between echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 03 2021
30 03 2021
Historique:
received:
29
12
2020
accepted:
17
03
2021
entrez:
31
3
2021
pubmed:
1
4
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients, left ventricular (LV) maximal wall thickness (MWT) is one of the most important factors determining sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk. In a large unselected sample of HCM patients, we aimed to simulate what changes would occur in the calculated SCD risk according to the European HCM Risk-SCD calculator when MWT measured using echocardiography was changed to MWT measured using MRI. All consecutive patients with HCM who underwent cardiac MRI were included. MWT measured with echocardiography and MRI were compared, and 5-year SCD risk according to the HCM Risk-SCD calculator was computed using four different models. The final population included 673 patients [389 (57.8%) males, median age 50 years, interquartile range (36-60)]. The median MWT was lower measured by echocardiography than by MRI [20 (17-24) mm vs 21 (18-24) mm; p < 0.0001]. There was agreement between echocardiography and MRI in the measurement of maximal LV wall thickness in 96 patients (14.3%). The largest differences between echo and MRI were - 13 mm and + 9 mm. The differences in MWT by echocardiography and MRI translated to a maximal difference of 8.33% in the absolute 5-year risk of SCD, i.e., the echocardiography-based risk was 8.33% lower than the MRI-based estimates. Interestingly, 13.7% of patients would have been reclassified into different SCD risk categories if MRI had been used to measure MWT instead of echocardiography. In conclusion, although there was high general intermodality agreement between echocardiography and MRI in the MWT measurements, the differences in MWT translated to significant differences in the 5-year risk of SCD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33785804
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86532-4
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-86532-4
pmc: PMC8009882
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7146Références
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Sep 1;116(5):757-64
pubmed: 26183790
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Oct 15;100(8):1293-8
pubmed: 17920373
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 15;119(4):643-650
pubmed: 27956002
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020 Sep;33(9):1106-1115
pubmed: 32564979
Am J Cardiol. 2017 May 1;119(9):1450-1455
pubmed: 28267963
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 14;54(3):220-8
pubmed: 19589434
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Aug;10(8):
pubmed: 28794137
Circulation. 2005 Aug 9;112(6):855-61
pubmed: 16087809
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 14;35(39):2733-79
pubmed: 25173338
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 13;58(25):e212-60
pubmed: 22075469
Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1194-1205
pubmed: 32876838
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 6;10(1):1967
pubmed: 32029853
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 14;10(1):21908
pubmed: 33318610
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jun;32(6):945-54
pubmed: 26896038
Heart. 2004 Jun;90(6):645-9
pubmed: 15145868
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21054
pubmed: 33273702
Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 7;35(30):2010-20
pubmed: 24126876
Circulation. 2020 Dec 22;142(25):e533-e557
pubmed: 33215938