Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Posttransplant Outcomes in Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Older Adult Recipients.


Journal

Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society
ISSN: 1527-6473
Titre abrégé: Liver Transpl
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100909185

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2021
Historique:
revised: 15 02 2021
received: 25 10 2020
accepted: 04 03 2021
pubmed: 1 4 2021
medline: 15 9 2021
entrez: 31 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The impact of increasing recipient age on morbidity and mortality following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains controversial. The study aims to analyze the impact of recipient age on outcomes following LDLT. Data on adult LDLTs performed between November 2009 and February 2020 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on recipient age: 18 to 65 years (younger adults) and >65 years (older adults). Propensity score matching (PSM) using nearest-neighbor matching was used to match each older recipient with up to 2 younger adult recipients using multiple preoperative parameters. Outcomes evaluated were duration of ventilation, need for reintubation, tracheostomy, intensive care unit (ICU) readmission, length of ICU and hospital stays, postoperative complications, reoperation within 90 days, and patient survival. A total of 801 adult LDLT recipients were included in the study; 751 (93.7%) were younger adults, and 50 (6.3%) were older adults. Older recipients were more likely to be diabetic (60.0% versus 39.7%) and hypertensive (44.0% versus 20.4%) with preexisting cardiac disease (28.0% versus 11.2%). However, their pretransplant Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was significantly lower (14.5 versus 17.7), and they were more likely to receive a transplant because of hepatocellular carcinoma (38.0% versus 17.7%). Older recipients had longer durations of ventilation after LT both before (3.7 versus 1.9 days) and after PSM (4.0 versus 1.5 days). After PSM, the 30-day (13.0% versus 2.4%), 90-day (15.2% and 2.4%), and overall mortality rates (21.7% versus 7.1%) were significantly higher for older recipients when compared with younger recipients. There was no difference between the younger and older recipients with respect to other postoperative outcomes. This propensity score-matched study shows that the older LDLT recipients have higher 30-day, 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality rates when compared with matched younger counterparts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33787013
doi: 10.1002/lt.26061
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1273-1282

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Références

Hannah Ritchie MR. Age structure. https://ourworldindata.org/age-structure. Published 2020. Accessed January 30, 2020.
OECD Indicators 2017. Health at a glance. https://doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2017en. Accessed October 21, 2020.
Stahl EC, Haschak MJ, Popovic B, Brown BN. Macrophages in the aging liver and age-related liver disease. Front Immunol 2018;9:2795.
Tajiri K, Shimizu Y. Liver physiology and liver diseases in the elderly. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:8459-8467.
Sepanlou SG, Safiri S, Bisignano C, Ikuta KS, Merat S, Saberifiroozi M, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of cirrhosis by cause in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:245-266.
Su F, Yu L, Berry K, Liou IW, Landis CS, Rayhill SC, et al. Aging of liver transplant registrants and recipients: trends and impact on waitlist outcomes, post-transplantation outcomes, and transplant-related survival benefit. Gastroenterology 2016;150:441-453.e6; quiz e16.
Durand F, Levitsky J, Cauchy F, Gilgenkrantz H, Soubrane O, Francoz C. Age and liver transplantation. J Hepatol 2019;70:745-758.
Martin P, DiMartini A, Feng S, Brown R, Jr., Fallon M. Evaluation for liver transplantation in adults: 2013 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation. Hepatology 2014;59:1144-1165.
Chen HP, Tsai YF, Lin JR, Liu FC, Yu HP. Recipient age and mortality risk after liver transplantation: a population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2016;11:e0152324.
Wilson GC, Quillin RC, 3rd, Wima K, Sutton JM, Hoehn RS, Hanseman DJ, et al. Is liver transplantation safe and effective in elderly (≥70 years) recipients? A case-controlled analysis. HPB 2014;16:1088-1094.
Gómez Gavara C, Esposito F, Gurusamy K, Salloum C, Lahat E, Feray C, et al. Liver transplantation in elderly patients: a systematic review and first meta-analysis. HPB 2019;21:14-25.
Kwon JH, Yoon YI, Song GW, Kim KH, Moon DB, Jung DH, et al. Living donor liver transplantation for patients older than age 70 years: a single-center experience. Am J Transplant 2017;17:2890-2900.
Li HY, Wei YG, Yan LN, Li B. Outcomes between elderly and young hepatocellular carcinoma living donor liver transplantation recipients: a single-center experience. Medicine 2016;95:e2499.
Oezcelik A, Dayangac M, Guler N, Yaprak O, Erdogan Y, Akyildiz M, et al. Living donor liver transplantation in patients 70 years or older. Transplantation 2015;99:1436-1440.
Abdelfattah MR, Elsiesy H. Reappraisal of upper age limit for adult living-donor liver transplantation using right lobe grafts: an outcome analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;27:593-599.
Ikegami T, Bekki Y, Imai D, Yoshizumi T, Ninomiya M, Hayashi H, et al. Clinical outcomes of living donor liver transplantation for patients 65 years old or older with preserved performance status. Liver Transpl 2014;20:408-415.
Yoshizumi T, Shirabe K, Soejima Y, Taketomi A, Yamashita N, Ikegami T, et al. Living donor liver transplantation in patients older than 60 years. Transplantation 2010;90:433-437.
Alim A, Malamutmann E, Dayangac M, Erdogan Y, Gokakin AK, Tokat Y, et al. Comorbidity index as a selection tool for living donor liver transplantation in elderly patients. Transplant Proc 2019;51:3315-3319.
Ushigome H, Nakao T, Harada S, Nakamura T, Koshino K, Suzuki T, et al. Elderly living donor liver transplant recipients over 60 years old at a Japanese Single Center. Transplant Proc 2016;48:1115-1118.
Gil E, Kim JM, Jeon K, Park H, Kang D, Cho J, et al. Recipient age and mortality after liver transplantation: a population-based cohort study. Transplantation 2018;102:2025-2032.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213.
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983;70:41-55.
Zhang Z, Kim HJ, Lonjon G, Zhu Y, written on behalf of AME Big-Data Trial Collaborative Group. Balance diagnostics after propensity score matching. Ann Transl Med 2018;7:16.
Mousa OY, Nguyen JH, Ma Y, Rawal B, Musto KR, Dougherty MK, et al. Evolving role of liver transplantation in elderly recipients. Liver Transpl 2019;25:1363-1374.
Goldberg DS, Charlton M. Usefulness of liver transplantation in the elderly: the converging impact of risk and benefit. Gastroenterology 2016;150:306-309.
Dolnikov S, Adam R, Cherqui D, Allard MA. Liver transplantation in elderly patients: what do we know at the beginning of 2020? Surg Today 2020;50:533-539.
Konerman MA, Fritze D, Weinberg RL, Sonnenday CJ, Sharma P. Incidence of and risk assessment for adverse cardiovascular outcomes after liver transplantation: a systematic review. Transplantation 2017;101:1645-1657.
VanWagner LB, Lapin B, Levitsky J, Wilkins JT, Abecassis MM, Skaro AI, et al. High early cardiovascular mortality after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2014;20:1306-1316.
Zaky A, Bendjelid K. Appraising cardiac dysfunction in liver transplantation: an ongoing challenge. Liver Int 2015;35:12-29.
Choudhary NS, Sonavane A, Saraf N, Saigal S, Rastogi A, Bhangui P, et al. Poor performance status predicts mortality after living donor liver transplantation. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2020;10:37-42.
Sharma M, Ahmed A, Wong RJ. Significantly higher mortality following liver transplantation among pateints aged 70 years and older. Prog Transplant 2017;27:225-231.
Takeda K, Sawada Y, Kumamoto T, Tanaka K, Endo I. Severe sepsis after living donor liver transplantation: risk factors and outcomes. Transplant Proc 2016;48:2124-2129.
Kahn J, Wagner D, Homfield N, Muller H, Kniepeiss D, Schemmer P. Both sarcopenia and frailty determine suitability of patients for liver transplantation-a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Clin Transplant 2018;32:e13226.
Lai JC, Feng S, Terrault NA, Lizaola B, Hayssen H, Covinsky K. Frailty predicts waitlist mortality in liver transplant candidates. Am J Transplant 2014;14:1870-1879.
Ebadi M, Montano-Loza AJ. Sarcopenia and frailty in the prognosis of patients on the liver transplant waiting list. Liver Transpl 2019;25:7-9.
Samstein B, Smith AR, Freise CE, Zimmerman MA, Baker T, Olthoff KM, et al. Complications and their resolution in recipients of deceased and living donor liver transplants: findings from the A2ALL cohort study. Am J Transplant 2016;16:594-602.
Au KP, Chan ACY. Is living donor liver transplantation justified in high model for end-stage liver disease candidates (35+)? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2019;24:637-643.
Macomber CW, Shaw JJ, Santry H, Saidi RF, Jabbour N, Tseng JF, et al. Centre volume and resource consumption in liver transplantation. HPB 2012;14:554-559.
Volk ML, Hernandez JC, Lok AS, Marrero JA. Modified Charlson comorbidity index for predicting survival after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2007;13:1515-1520.
Wasilewicz M, Raszeja-Wyszomirska J, Wunsch E, Wojcicki M, Milkiewicz P. Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index in predicting early mortality after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2009;41:3117-3118.
Montalti R, Rompianesi G, Di Benedetto F, Ballarin R, Gerring RC, Busani S, et al. Liver transplantation in patients aged 65 and over: a case-control study. Clin Transplant 2010;24:E188-E193.
Wu V-C, Chen S-W, Chou A-H, Wu M, Ting P-C, Chang S-H, et al. Nationwide cohort study of outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in patients with liver cirrhosis: a nationwide cohort study. Medicine 2020;99:e19575.
Vaz J, Eriksson B, Stromberg U, Buchebner D, Midlov P. Incidence, aetiology and related comorbidities of cirrhosis: a Swedish population-based cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol 2020;20:84.
Wang CW, Covinsky KE, Feng S, Hayssen H, Segev DL, Lai JC. Functional impairment in older liver transplantation candidates: from the functional assessment in liver transplantation study. Liver Transpl 2015;21:1465-1470.

Auteurs

Abdul Rahman Hakeem (AR)

The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Rukhaiya Fathima (R)

The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Hrishikesh Padmanaban (H)

The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Kulaseharan Haribabu (K)

The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Rajesh Rajalingam (R)

The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Kumar Palaniappan (K)

The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Dinesh Jothimani (D)

The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Rathan Kanagavelu (R)

The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Akila Rajakumar (A)

The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Ilankumaran Kaliamoorthy (I)

The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Mettu Srinivas Reddy (MS)

The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Mohamed Rela (M)

The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH