Denosumab Reduces Lesional Fluoride Skeletal Burden on Na[18F]F PET-CT in Patients With Fibrous Dysplasia/McCune-Albright Syndrome.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Bone Density Conservation Agents
/ pharmacology
Bone Remodeling
/ drug effects
Bone and Bones
/ diagnostic imaging
Denosumab
/ pharmacology
Female
Fibrous Dysplasia, Polyostotic
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
McCune–Albright
Sodium fluoride PET-CT
bisphosphonates
denosumab
fibrous dysplasia
follow-up
Journal
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
ISSN: 1945-7197
Titre abrégé: J Clin Endocrinol Metab
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0375362
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 07 2021
13 07 2021
Historique:
received:
21
10
2020
pubmed:
1
4
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
31
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The correlation between fibrous dysplasia/McCune-Albright syndrome (FD/MAS) skeletal disease burden on Na[18F]F positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and serum bone turnover markers (BTMs) was recently described. The effect of treatment on lesional fluoride burden in FD/MAS is unknown. To investigate treatment response measurements in patients with FD/MAS who underwent Na[18F]F-PET-CT and treatment with antiresorptives. Observational case series at an academic center of expertise for rare bone diseases. Fifteen consecutive patients were observed with FD/MAS with baseline and follow-up Na[18F]F-PET-CT parameters of healthy bone and FD lesions, BTMs, and pain scores at start of denosumab (n = 8) treatment and non-denosumab patients (n = 7). On Na[18F]F-PET-CT the volumetric measures of FD burden (fluoride tumor volume [FTV]) and "fraction affected skeleton" (FAS) represented the portion of the skeleton affected. This was correlated with BTMs and pain. Disease activity decreased significantly, with FTV 361 cm3 to 97 cm3 (P = .018) in denosumab-treated patients, but not in non-denosumab patients (P = .249). Serum P1NP and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) decreased significantly: 82 ng/mL vs 55 ng/mL (P = .023) and 119 IU/L vs 84 IU/L (P = .020), respectively. In denosumab-treated patients pain scores improved leading to pain medication reduction. This correlated with lesional uptake, but healthy bone activity did not change. BTMs and FTV correlated positively (P1NP r = 0.730, P < .001; and ALP r = 0.406, P = .006), as did change in BTMs and FTV: P1NP (P = 0.032) and ALP (P = 0.024). FAS strongly correlated with treatment-induced decrease in ALP (P = .027) and P1NP (P = .009). Na[18F]F-PET-CT captured treatment-induced lesional changes which correlated with BTMs and pain reduction. Therefore Na[18F]F-PET-CT can be used as an objective local parameter of response to denosumab treatment in FD/MAS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33788944
pii: 6206747
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab212
pmc: PMC8277209
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Density Conservation Agents
0
Denosumab
4EQZ6YO2HI
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2980-e2994Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 31;349(5):457-63
pubmed: 12890844
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Apr-May;139(1-3):208-13
pubmed: 20167792
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jun;47(6):1351-1352
pubmed: 32100058
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Aug;55(4):448-57
pubmed: 21738117
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Apr 24;6(2):128-34
pubmed: 27186440
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jul 15;7(3):92-104
pubmed: 28721303
N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 12;325(24):1688-95
pubmed: 1944469
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Aug;91(8):1882-9
pubmed: 19651945
Semin Nucl Med. 2017 Jul;47(4):392-396
pubmed: 28583278
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jun;47(6):1527-1537
pubmed: 31875244
PET Clin. 2018 Oct;13(4):477-490
pubmed: 30219183
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Dec 1;104(12):6069-6078
pubmed: 31390018
World J Urol. 2018 Jan;36(1):27-34
pubmed: 29043431
J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Sep;34(9):1619-1631
pubmed: 31116487
J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Feb;20(2):219-26
pubmed: 15647815
Clin Radiol. 2019 Feb;74(2):95-110
pubmed: 30340750
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jun;47(6):1349-1350
pubmed: 31925457