Cochlear Implantation and Other Treatments in Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Results of a National Multicenter Study Including a Randomized Controlled Trial.


Journal

Audiology & neuro-otology
ISSN: 1421-9700
Titre abrégé: Audiol Neurootol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9606930

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 24 04 2020
accepted: 28 12 2020
pubmed: 1 4 2021
medline: 30 11 2021
entrez: 31 3 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cochlear implantation is a recent approach proposed to treat single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). Several cohort studies showed its effectiveness on tinnitus and variable results on binaural hearing. The main objective of this study is to assess the outcomes of cochlear implantation and other treatment options in SSD/AHL on quality of life. This prospective multicenter study was conducted in 7 tertiary university hospitals and included an observational cohort study of SSD/AHL adult patients treated using contralateral routing of the signal (CROS) hearing aids or bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHSs) or who declined all treatments, and a randomized controlled trial in subjects treated by cochlear implantation, after failure of CROS and BAHS trials. In total, 155 subjects with SSD or AHL, with or without associated tinnitus, were enrolled. After 2 consecutive trials with CROS hearing aids and BAHSs on headband, all subjects chose any of the 4 treatment options (abstention, CROS, BAHS, or cochlear implant [CI]). The subjects who opted for a CI were randomized between 2 arms (CI vs. initial observation). Six months after the treatment choice, quality of life was assessed using both generic (EuroQoL-5D, EQ-5D) and auditory-specific quality-of-life indices (Nijmegen Cochlear implant Questionnaire [NCIQ] and Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] for tinnitus severity). Performances for speech-in-noise recognition and localization were measured as secondary outcomes. CROS was chosen by 75 subjects, while 51 opted for cochlear implantation, 18 for BAHSs, and 11 for abstention. Six months after treatment, both EQ-5D VAS and auditory-specific quality-of-life indices were significantly better in the "CI" arm versus "observation" arm. The mean effect of the CI was particularly significant in subjects with associated severe tinnitus (mean improvement of 20.7 points ± 19.7 on EQ-5D VAS, 20.4 ± 12.4 on NCIQ, and 51.4 ± 35.4 on tinnitus). No significant effect of the CI was found on binaural hearing results. Before/after comparisons showed that the CROS and BAHS also improved significantly NCIQ scores (for CROS: +7.7, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = [4.5; 10.8]; for the BAHS: +14.3, 95% CI = [7.9; 20.7]). Cochlear implantation leads to significant improvements in quality of life in SSD and AHL patients, particularly in subjects with associated severe tinnitus, who are thereby the best candidates to an extension of CI indications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33789270
pii: 000514085
doi: 10.1159/000514085
pmc: PMC8686720
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Observational Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

414-424

Informations de copyright

The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Références

Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jan;32(1):39-47
pubmed: 21068690
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Oct;36(5):442-9
pubmed: 21883961
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Aug;271(8):2119-26
pubmed: 24096818
Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Dec;41(6):737-743
pubmed: 26868059
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2015 May 23;15:3
pubmed: 27777509
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Feb;36(2):209-19
pubmed: 25502451
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 25;11(4):e0153131
pubmed: 27111333
Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20 Suppl 1:87-9
pubmed: 25998097
Ear Hear. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):1293-1306
pubmed: 30870240
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
Ear Hear. 2015 May-Jun;36(3):e93-8
pubmed: 25474416
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Dec;31(9):1381-5
pubmed: 20729788
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jul 28;102:135-143
pubmed: 28623107
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Dec;123(6):756-65
pubmed: 11112975
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2014 Aug 11;14:7
pubmed: 25152694
Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:347-55
pubmed: 17956799
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Mar;269(3):799-805
pubmed: 21833562
Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20 Suppl 1:67-72
pubmed: 25997790
Int J Audiol. 2012 Mar;51(3):164-73
pubmed: 22122354
Audiol Neurootol. 2016;21(6):391-398
pubmed: 28319951
Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(5):294-313
pubmed: 26227468
Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(3):163-71
pubmed: 19005250
Hear Res. 1994 May;75(1-2):38-46
pubmed: 8071153
Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Feb;31(1):6-14
pubmed: 16441794
Laryngoscope. 2020 Jul;130(7):1805-1811
pubmed: 31710701
Ear Hear. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):495-507
pubmed: 27232073
Eur J Health Econ. 2009 Jul;10(3):347-55
pubmed: 19475439
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2019 Feb 4;19:1
pubmed: 30766449
Int J Audiol. 2004 May;43(5):245-51
pubmed: 15357407
Audiol Neurootol. 2014;19(2):85-90
pubmed: 24401757
Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20 Suppl 1:79-86
pubmed: 25997991
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1426-32
pubmed: 24786540
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Sep;117(9):645-52
pubmed: 18834065

Auteurs

Mathieu Marx (M)

Service d'Otologie, Otoneurologie et ORL pédiatrique, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.
Brain & Cognition Research Centre, UMR 5549, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.

Isabelle Mosnier (I)

AP-HP6, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Paris, France.

Frederic Venail (F)

Service d'ORL, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac, CHU, Montpellier, France.

Michel Mondain (M)

Service d'ORL, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac, CHU, Montpellier, France.

Alain Uziel (A)

Service d'ORL, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac, CHU, Montpellier, France.

David Bakhos (D)

Service d'ORL, Hôpital Bretonneau, CHU Tours, Tours, France.

Emmanuel Lescanne (E)

Service d'ORL, Hôpital Bretonneau, CHU Tours, Tours, France.

Yann N'Guyen (Y)

AP-HP6, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Paris, France.

Daniele Bernardeschi (D)

AP-HP6, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Paris, France.

Olivier Sterkers (O)

AP-HP6, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Paris, France.

Olivier Deguine (O)

Service d'Otologie, Otoneurologie et ORL pédiatrique, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.
Brain & Cognition Research Centre, UMR 5549, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.

Benoît Lepage (B)

Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Benoit Godey (B)

Service d'ORL, Hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU, Rennes, France.

Sébastien Schmerber (S)

Service d'ORL, CHU, Grenoble, France.

Nicolas-Xavier Bonne (NX)

Université Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Service d'ORL, U1192 - PRISM, Lille, France.

Christophe Vincent (C)

Service d'ORL, Hôpital Salengro, CHU, Lille, France.

Bernard Fraysse (B)

Service d'Otologie, Otoneurologie et ORL pédiatrique, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH