Molecular sexing of degraded DNA from elephants and mammoths: a genotyping assay relevant both to conservation biology and to paleogenetics.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 03 2021
31 03 2021
Historique:
received:
18
09
2020
accepted:
29
01
2021
entrez:
1
4
2021
pubmed:
2
4
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is important to determine the sex of elephants from their samples-faeces from the field or seized ivory-for forensic reasons or to understand population demography and genetic structure. Molecular sexing methods developed in the last two decades have often shown limited efficiency, particularly in terms of sensitivity and specificity, due to the degradation of DNA in these samples. These limitations have also prevented their use with ancient DNA samples of elephants or mammoths. Here we propose a novel TaqMan-MGB qPCR assay to address these difficulties. We designed it specifically to allow the characterization of the genetic sex for highly degraded samples of all elephantine taxa (elephants and mammoths). In vitro experiments demonstrated a high level of sensitivity and low contamination risks. We applied this assay in two actual case studies where it consistently recovered the right genotype for specimens of known sex a priori. In the context of a modern conservation survey of African elephants, it allowed determining the sex for over 99% of fecal samples. In a paleogenetic analysis of woolly mammoths, it produced a robust hypothesis of the sex for over 65% of the specimens out of three PCR replicates. This simple, rapid, and cost-effective procedure makes it readily applicable to large sample sizes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33790303
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86010-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-86010-x
pmc: PMC8012363
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7227Références
Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Sep;11(5):831-4
pubmed: 21635697
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Oct 7;269(1504):1993-2006
pubmed: 12396498
Mol Ecol. 2012 Feb;21(3):765-78
pubmed: 21880086
Curr Biol. 2017 Nov 20;27(22):3505-3510.e3
pubmed: 29103934
Clin Chim Acta. 2006 Jan;363(1-2):32-47
pubmed: 16182268
Curr Biol. 2008 Sep 9;18(17):1320-6
pubmed: 18771918
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 17;9(7):e102177
pubmed: 25033459
Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Nov;16(11):1466-73
pubmed: 10555277
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(1):e3
pubmed: 22021376
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Mar 7;273(1586):513-22
pubmed: 16537121
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):E2566-E2574
pubmed: 29483247
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(9):2228-32
pubmed: 17853880
Mol Ecol. 1997 Sep;6(9):861-8
pubmed: 9301074
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Aug;40(2):620-7
pubmed: 16631387
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20642
pubmed: 21701575
Methods Mol Biol. 2009;578:277-92
pubmed: 19768601
Int J Legal Med. 2009 Mar;123(2):117-21
pubmed: 18612647
Curr Biol. 2015 May 18;25(10):1395-400
pubmed: 25913407
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
pubmed: 2231712
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 22;7:44585
pubmed: 28327635
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Jun 10;219(1-3):106-12
pubmed: 22257967
Conserv Biol. 2008 Aug;22(4):1065-71
pubmed: 18786100
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Apr 9;10(4):1427-1432
pubmed: 32107273
J Forensic Sci. 2006 Jul;51(4):805-7
pubmed: 16882222
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 11;9(1):18863
pubmed: 31827140
Ecol Evol. 2015 Oct 22;5(22):5216-5229
pubmed: 30151125
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jun;37(10):3215-29
pubmed: 19321502
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;882:173-82
pubmed: 22665234
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Mar;26(3):421-34
pubmed: 12644401
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 7;276(1658):893-902
pubmed: 19019786
Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Aug 15;24(16):3189-94
pubmed: 8774899