The effect of antimicrobial treatment on mortality associated with urinary tract disease in mink kits (Neovison vison).
Antibiotics
Cystitis
Treatment
Urolithiasis
Veterinary
Journal
Acta veterinaria Scandinavica
ISSN: 1751-0147
Titre abrégé: Acta Vet Scand
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370400
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2021
01 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
08
01
2021
accepted:
26
03
2021
entrez:
2
4
2021
pubmed:
3
4
2021
medline:
31
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mink urinary tract disease (MUTD) often presents as urolithiasis and/or cystitis and is known as an important cause of mortality in mink kits during the early growth season. Antimicrobial flock treatment has been routinely applied as preventive/therapeutic protocol on Danish mink farms with increased mortality associated with MUTD. The therapeutic effect of this treatment strategy has not previously been investigated. In this study, we applied controlled parallel group treatment trials to assess the effect of sulfadiazine/trimethoprim and amoxicillin treatment on mortality associated with MUTD in mink kits. On farm A, eight mink kits were diagnosed with MUTD post mortem in the treatment group (n = 1920, sulfadiazine/trimethoprim treatment: 30 mg/kg, q 24 h, P.O for 5 days) compared to 16 in the untreated control group (n = 1920). No significant difference in mortality associated with MUTD were found between the treatment and the control group using the Fisher's exact test (P = 0.15). Treatment group 2 (n = 1920, amoxicillin treatment: 14 mg/kg q 24 h, P.O for 5 days) and treatment group 3 (n = 2088, amoxicillin treatment: 7.5 mg/kg q 24 h, P.O for 5 days) were investigated on farm B. Eight and four mink kits were diagnosed with MUTD post mortem in group 2 and 3, respectively. No difference between occurrence of MUTD were found between the control group and treatment group 2 (P = 0.42) or treatment group 3 (P = 0.75). No significant difference between final body weights or weight gain were found between treatment and control weighing groups on farm A or B. In conclusion, antimicrobial treatment administered in the feed showed no significant effect on weight gain or mortality associated with MUTD on the farms included in this study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33794953
doi: 10.1186/s13028-021-00581-3
pii: 10.1186/s13028-021-00581-3
pmc: PMC8017834
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15Subventions
Organisme : Innovationsfonden
ID : 7038-00033B
Références
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;44(1):93-106
pubmed: 32924166
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2009 Jan;39(1):65-78
pubmed: 19038651
Cornell Vet. 1950 Oct;40(4):367-77
pubmed: 14792977
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Apr;1(4):358-62
pubmed: 4598841
J Urol. 1956 Apr;75(4):602-14
pubmed: 13307761
Compend Contin Educ Vet. 2013 Aug;35(8):E1; quiz E1
pubmed: 23677867
J Vet Intern Med. 2016 Sep;30(5):1564-1574
pubmed: 27611724
Vet Microbiol. 2009 Jan 1;133(1-2):115-22
pubmed: 18620819
Vet Med Int. 2011;2011:263768
pubmed: 21776346
Vet Microbiol. 2012 Oct 12;159(3-4):351-3
pubmed: 22542523
Vet Microbiol. 2020 Jun;245:108706
pubmed: 32456816
Res Vet Sci. 2020 Dec;133:326-331
pubmed: 33172618
Acta Vet Scand. 2017 Sep 13;59(1):60
pubmed: 28903765
Arch Exp Veterinarmed. 1985 Jul;39(4):560-4
pubmed: 4051668
Chemotherapy. 1973;19(5):289-98
pubmed: 4595634