What are the challenges when recruiting to a trial in children's social care? A qualitative evaluation of a trial of foster carer training.

Confidence in Care Foster Care Fostering Changes Looked after children Out-of-home care Social care Trial recruitment

Journal

Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2021
Historique:
received: 15 09 2020
accepted: 11 03 2021
entrez: 2 4 2021
pubmed: 3 4 2021
medline: 22 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are comparatively rare in UK social work, but can offer distinct advantages. Confidence in Care (CiC) is an RCT with embedded process evaluation evaluating Fostering Changes (FC), a 12-week training programme for foster and kinship carers to increase skills and coping strategies. In order to mitigate challenges in participant recruitment, an engagement strategy was designed to maximise this. Our aim is to explore experiences of key study stakeholders towards trial recruitment and identify broader messages about recruitment to social care trials. Three focus groups were conducted, two with field-based recruiting staff (n = 7) and one with carers who attended the FC programme (n = 8). Five interviews were conducted with trainers who delivered FC, eight with foster carers who attended the programme, 18 with Foster Carers who elected not to take part in the programme, and 12 with social workers from participating trial sites. In addition, an away day for FC trainers was observed and discussions related to recruitment were noted. Transcribed audio-recorded data were inductively coded, double-coded by a second researcher, and thematically analysed. Six themes were identified. The first addressed pragmatic aspects of the intervention affecting recruitment (e.g. committing to a 12-week programme). A second focussed on accuracy of communication about the trial between provider agencies and carers. A third concerned the ability of recruiting staff to contact carers, a particular challenge in group-based recruitment. A fourth addressed trial methods and their communication (e.g. relationship between trial team and recruiting staff). A fifth explored lack of differentiation by carers between the roles of the various professionals (e.g. FC facilitators and provider agencies). The sixth addressed perceived differences between recruitment into social care and health studies. Recruitment challenges in this social care setting were similar to those in healthcare. Some (e.g. gatekeeping by professional staff) may be rooted in randomisation anxiety, or unfamiliarity with research methods. Researchers more familiar with healthcare recruitment were however encouraged about the experience of working in this care setting. The original recruitment strategy and adaptations form the basis of further recommendations for research practice. ISRCTN19090228 . Registered on 11 January 2017.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are comparatively rare in UK social work, but can offer distinct advantages. Confidence in Care (CiC) is an RCT with embedded process evaluation evaluating Fostering Changes (FC), a 12-week training programme for foster and kinship carers to increase skills and coping strategies. In order to mitigate challenges in participant recruitment, an engagement strategy was designed to maximise this. Our aim is to explore experiences of key study stakeholders towards trial recruitment and identify broader messages about recruitment to social care trials.
METHODS METHODS
Three focus groups were conducted, two with field-based recruiting staff (n = 7) and one with carers who attended the FC programme (n = 8). Five interviews were conducted with trainers who delivered FC, eight with foster carers who attended the programme, 18 with Foster Carers who elected not to take part in the programme, and 12 with social workers from participating trial sites. In addition, an away day for FC trainers was observed and discussions related to recruitment were noted. Transcribed audio-recorded data were inductively coded, double-coded by a second researcher, and thematically analysed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Six themes were identified. The first addressed pragmatic aspects of the intervention affecting recruitment (e.g. committing to a 12-week programme). A second focussed on accuracy of communication about the trial between provider agencies and carers. A third concerned the ability of recruiting staff to contact carers, a particular challenge in group-based recruitment. A fourth addressed trial methods and their communication (e.g. relationship between trial team and recruiting staff). A fifth explored lack of differentiation by carers between the roles of the various professionals (e.g. FC facilitators and provider agencies). The sixth addressed perceived differences between recruitment into social care and health studies.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Recruitment challenges in this social care setting were similar to those in healthcare. Some (e.g. gatekeeping by professional staff) may be rooted in randomisation anxiety, or unfamiliarity with research methods. Researchers more familiar with healthcare recruitment were however encouraged about the experience of working in this care setting. The original recruitment strategy and adaptations form the basis of further recommendations for research practice.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ISRCTN19090228 . Registered on 11 January 2017.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33794976
doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05186-9
pii: 10.1186/s13063-021-05186-9
pmc: PMC8015028
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

241

Subventions

Organisme : The Big Lottery Fund
ID : 0010250833

Références

Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Nov;109:104768
pubmed: 33065358
Trials. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):34
pubmed: 29325593
Trials. 2015 May 07;16:206
pubmed: 25947202
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Oct;108:104646
pubmed: 32781371
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 22;2:MR000013
pubmed: 29468635
BMJ. 2009 Mar 12;338:b866
pubmed: 19282440
Trials. 2018 Mar 1;19(1):147
pubmed: 29490702

Auteurs

Gwenllian Moody (G)

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK. MoodyG@cardiff.ac.uk.

Lucy Brookes-Howell (L)

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.

Rebecca Cannings-John (R)

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.

Sue Channon (S)

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.

Elinor Coulman (E)

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.

Alyson Rees (A)

Children's Social Care Research and Development Centre (CASCADE), School of Social Studies, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Jeremy Segrott (J)

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Public Health Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Michael Robling (M)

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Public Health Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH