Nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine combination is more effective than gemcitabine alone in locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer - A GISCAD phase II randomized trial.
Adenocarcinoma
/ drug therapy
Adult
Aged
Albumins
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Deoxycytidine
/ administration & dosage
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Paclitaxel
/ administration & dosage
Pancreatic Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Gemcitabine
Advanced pancreatic cancer
Paclitaxel and gemcitabine
Phase II randomized trial
Journal
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
04
09
2020
revised:
10
02
2021
accepted:
15
02
2021
pubmed:
4
4
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
3
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The role of combination chemotherapy has not yet been established in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) lacking dedicated randomized trials. This phase II trial tested the efficacy of Nab-paclitaxel (NAB-P)/Gemcitabine (G) versus G alone. Patients were randomized, 1:1 to G 1000 mg/m A total of124 patients were enrolled. The study showed a reduction of a progressive disease from 45.6% with G to 25.4% with NAB-P/G (P = 0.01) at 3 months. Noteworthy, at 6 months in the G arm, 35.6% of patients present a metastatic spread versus 20.8% in the NAB/G arm. The response rate was 5.3% in the G arm and 27% in the NAB/G arm. Median PFS was 4 months for the G arm and 7 months for the NAB-P/G arm. Median OS was 10.6 in the G arm and 12.7 months in the NAB-P/G arm. One patient died during treatment with G due to a stroke. NAB-P/G reduced the rate of LAPC patients progressing after three cycles of chemotherapy compared with G, especially in terms of distant relapses. It positively affects PFS. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial providing evidence that combination chemotherapy is superior to gemcitabine alone in this setting. CLINICALTRIALS. NCT02043730.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The role of combination chemotherapy has not yet been established in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) lacking dedicated randomized trials.
METHODS
This phase II trial tested the efficacy of Nab-paclitaxel (NAB-P)/Gemcitabine (G) versus G alone. Patients were randomized, 1:1 to G 1000 mg/m
FINDINGS
A total of124 patients were enrolled. The study showed a reduction of a progressive disease from 45.6% with G to 25.4% with NAB-P/G (P = 0.01) at 3 months. Noteworthy, at 6 months in the G arm, 35.6% of patients present a metastatic spread versus 20.8% in the NAB/G arm. The response rate was 5.3% in the G arm and 27% in the NAB/G arm. Median PFS was 4 months for the G arm and 7 months for the NAB-P/G arm. Median OS was 10.6 in the G arm and 12.7 months in the NAB-P/G arm. One patient died during treatment with G due to a stroke.
INTERPRETATION
NAB-P/G reduced the rate of LAPC patients progressing after three cycles of chemotherapy compared with G, especially in terms of distant relapses. It positively affects PFS. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial providing evidence that combination chemotherapy is superior to gemcitabine alone in this setting. CLINICALTRIALS.
GOV IDENTIFIER
NCT02043730.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33812334
pii: S0959-8049(21)00106-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.023
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxel
0
Albumins
0
Deoxycytidine
0W860991D6
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Gemcitabine
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02043730']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
422-429Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement Dr Cascinu reports grants from Celegne during the conduct of the study; other from Celegne; other from Servier, outside the submitted work; and the remaining authors have nothing to disclose.