Understanding the influence of lipid bilayers and ligand molecules in determining the conformational dynamics of somatostatin receptor 2.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 04 2021
Historique:
received: 24 12 2020
accepted: 26 03 2021
entrez: 8 4 2021
pubmed: 9 4 2021
medline: 11 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that controls numerous cellular processes including cell-to-cell signaling. In this study, we report how the lipid and ligand molecules influence the conformational dynamics of the membrane-bound SSTR2. Molecular simulations of different holo and apoenzyme complexes of SSTR2 in the presence and absence of a lipid bilayer were performed, observed, and correlated with previously reported studies. We identified the important SSTR2 residues that take part in the formation of the SSTR2-ligand complex. On analyzing the molecular simulation trajectories, we identified that the residue D3.32 is crucial in determining the bioactive conformation of SSTR2 ligands in the binding site. Based on the results, we suggest that designing a novel SSTR2 ligand with an H-bond donor group at the R1 position, and hydrophobic groups at R2 and R3 might have higher activity and SSTR2-selectivity. We analyzed the simulated systems to identify other important structural features involved in SSTR2-ligand binding and to observe the different conformational changes that occur in the protein after the ligand binding. Additionally, we studied the conformational dynamics of N- and C-terminal regions of SSTR2 in the presence and absence of the lipid bilayer. Both the systems were compared to understand the influence of lipid molecules in the formation of secondary structural domains by these extracellular regions. The comparative study revealed that the secondary structural elements formed by C-terminal residues in presence of lipid molecules is crucial for the functioning of SSTR2. Our study results highlight the structural complexities involved in the functioning of SSTR upon binding with the ligands in the presence and absence of lipid bilayer, which is essential for designing novel drug targets.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33828200
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87422-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-87422-5
pmc: PMC8027056
doi:

Substances chimiques

Ligands 0
Lipid Bilayers 0
Receptors, Somatostatin 0
somatostatin receptor 2 D73QL0OMU2

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

7677

Références

J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2019 Aug;37(12):3081-3102
pubmed: 30079808
Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2001 Feb 12;11(3):415-7
pubmed: 11212124
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2011 Jan;32(1):35-42
pubmed: 21075459
J Neurochem. 1999 Mar;72(3):1275-82
pubmed: 10037501
Endocrinology. 2012 Jun;153(6):2747-55
pubmed: 22495673
J Chem Theory Comput. 2016 Jan 12;12(1):405-13
pubmed: 26631602
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42
pubmed: 10592235
World J Gastroenterol. 1997 Dec 15;3(4):201-4
pubmed: 27053863
J Biol Chem. 1999 Nov 12;274(46):32997-3001
pubmed: 10551867
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995 Nov 22;216(3):913-21
pubmed: 7488212
J Comp Neurol. 2002 Dec 16;454(3):329-40
pubmed: 12442323
Mol Pharmacol. 1997 Nov;52(5):807-14
pubmed: 9351971
Nature. 2012 Nov 29;491(7426):779-83
pubmed: 23086146
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2018 Jan;25(1):4-12
pubmed: 29323277
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 Nov 10;1469(3):159-95
pubmed: 11063882
Mol Divers. 2017 May;21(2):367-384
pubmed: 28155055
Mol Imaging. 2007 Nov-Dec;6(6):427-37
pubmed: 18053413
J Biol Chem. 2011 Apr 15;286(15):13561-73
pubmed: 21343287
Science. 2007 Nov 23;318(5854):1258-65
pubmed: 17962520
J Comput Chem. 2008 Aug;29(11):1859-65
pubmed: 18351591
Mol Endocrinol. 2011 Jun;25(6):1040-54
pubmed: 21493671
J Biol Chem. 1997 Sep 19;272(38):23769-74
pubmed: 9295322
Head Face Med. 2019 Jan 4;15(1):2
pubmed: 30609928
Science. 2007 Nov 23;318(5854):1266-73
pubmed: 17962519
Biophys J. 2000 Dec;79(6):3172-92
pubmed: 11106622
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;30:51-58
pubmed: 27475047
Cell Signal. 2017 May;33:1-9
pubmed: 28188824
EMBO J. 1995 Feb 15;14(4):727-35
pubmed: 7882976
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Jan;12(1):25-34
pubmed: 23237917
Biophys J. 2008 Sep;95(5):2356-67
pubmed: 18502796
Childs Nerv Syst. 2013 Aug;29(8):1253-62
pubmed: 23677175
Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005 Aug 1;15(15):3555-9
pubmed: 15982879
Biophys J. 1996 Mar;70(3):1419-31
pubmed: 8785298
Br J Pharmacol. 2012 Mar;165(6):1688-1703
pubmed: 21864311
Mol Pharmacol. 2008 Feb;73(2):292-304
pubmed: 17981995
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015 Feb;16(2):69-81
pubmed: 25589408
J Biochem. 2010 Jun;147(6):867-73
pubmed: 20207824
Cell. 2017 Jul 27;170(3):414-427
pubmed: 28753422
Endocrinology. 2019 May 1;160(5):1031-1043
pubmed: 30822353
J Comput Chem. 2014 Oct 15;35(27):1997-2004
pubmed: 25130509
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 May 20;1669(2):182-92
pubmed: 15893521
ACS Omega. 2020 Aug 11;5(33):21145-21161
pubmed: 32875251

Auteurs

Santhosh Kumar Nagarajan (SK)

Computational Biology Lab, Department of Genetic Engineering, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203, India.

Sathya Babu (S)

Computational Biology Lab, Department of Genetic Engineering, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203, India.

Seema A Kulkarni (SA)

Department of Food and Process Engineering, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203, India.

Aanand Vadivelu (A)

Computational Biology Lab, Department of Genetic Engineering, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203, India.

Panneer Devaraju (P)

Unit of Vector Biology and Control, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Puducherry, India.

Honglae Sohn (H)

Department of Chemistry and Department of Carbon Materials, Chosun University, Gwangju, South Korea. hsohn@chosun.ac.kr.

Thirumurthy Madhavan (T)

Computational Biology Lab, Department of Genetic Engineering, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chennai, 603203, India. thiru.murthyunom@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

alpha-Synuclein Humans Animals Mice Lewy Body Disease
Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1 Ligands Molecular Dynamics Simulation Protein Binding Thermodynamics

Mutational analysis of Phanerochaete chrysosporium´s purine transporter.

Mariana Barraco-Vega, Manuel Sanguinetti, Gabriela da Rosa et al.
1.00
Phanerochaete Fungal Proteins Purines Aspergillus nidulans DNA Mutational Analysis

Structural basis for molecular assembly of fucoxanthin chlorophyll

Koji Kato, Yoshiki Nakajima, Jian Xing et al.
1.00
Diatoms Photosystem I Protein Complex Chlorophyll Binding Proteins Cryoelectron Microscopy Light-Harvesting Protein Complexes

Classifications MeSH