The Efficiency of Fluoride Bioactive Glasses in Protecting Enamel Surrounding Orthodontic Bracket.
Journal
BioMed research international
ISSN: 2314-6141
Titre abrégé: Biomed Res Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101600173
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
05
01
2021
revised:
21
02
2021
accepted:
28
02
2021
entrez:
9
4
2021
pubmed:
10
4
2021
medline:
26
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of using four different fluoride bioactive enamel sealers against an acidic erosion challenge. A sample of 50 freshly extracted sound upper premolars had their buccal surface bonded to 50 orthodontic brackets using Transbond PLUS color change adhesive; the first four groups had four compositions of fluoride bioactive glasses based on 37 mol% SiO The FTIR/ATR test showed that fluoride bioactive pastes' applications resulted in the formation of a hydroxyapatite-rich layer; the SEM analysis showed that the aforementioned layer significantly resisted erosion challenge when compared to the control group ( Fluoride bioactive pastes can efficiently protect the enamel surfaces next to orthodontic brackets from acidic erosion challenges.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33834066
doi: 10.1155/2021/5544196
pmc: PMC8016578
doi:
Substances chimiques
Pit and Fissure Sealants
0
Protective Agents
0
Resins, Synthetic
0
Fluorides
Q80VPU408O
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5544196Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Mona Aly Abbassy et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Dent Mater. 2013 Apr;29(4):357-64
pubmed: 23347789
J Dent Res. 2011 Feb;90(2):246-50
pubmed: 21084716
Br J Orthod. 1992 Aug;19(3):199-205
pubmed: 1390575
J Dent. 2014 Nov;42(11):1458-63
pubmed: 24907559
Dent Mater J. 2007 May;26(3):422-8
pubmed: 17694754
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Nov;128(5):592-600; quiz 670
pubmed: 16286206
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009 Aug;20(8):1611-8
pubmed: 19330429
J Dent. 2016 Aug;51:1-7
pubmed: 27208874
J Dent. 2018 Sep;76:52-57
pubmed: 29933004
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 May;139(5):e463-70
pubmed: 21536188
Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Aug;72(6):413-7
pubmed: 24325608
J Dent. 2019 Jun;85:33-38
pubmed: 31039386
Dent Mater. 2014 Mar;30(3):314-20
pubmed: 24433821
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2340-2348
pubmed: 28238298
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2010;8(1):41-5
pubmed: 20480053
Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):11-19
pubmed: 28566845
J Oral Sci. 2016;58(1):35-42
pubmed: 27021538
Biomed Mater. 2013 Dec;8(6):065008
pubmed: 24287337
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Nov;124(5):571-6
pubmed: 14614425
J Dent. 2011 Sep;39(9):599-603
pubmed: 21726598
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Jul;100(1):35-7
pubmed: 2069145
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jun 04;12(11):
pubmed: 31167432
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Jan;155(1):10-18
pubmed: 30591153
Int Dent J. 2012 Oct;62(5):223-43
pubmed: 23106836
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2019 Dec;61:126-131
pubmed: 31493737
J Biomed Mater Res. 1993 Dec;27(12):1485-93
pubmed: 8113235
Am J Orthod. 1982 Jul;82(1):62-7
pubmed: 6984291
J Orthod Sci. 2019 Feb 20;8:5
pubmed: 31001497
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Dec;22(9):3143-3157
pubmed: 29524024
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Aug;20(3):170-176
pubmed: 28727319
Materials (Basel). 2018 Sep 06;11(9):
pubmed: 30200640
Acta Biomater. 2010 Aug;6(8):3275-82
pubmed: 20132911