Biofilm reduction potential of 0.02% polyhexanide irrigation solution in several types of urethral catheters.
Bacterial decolonization
Biofilm
Polyhexanide
Transurethral catheter
Urinary catheter
Urinary tract infection
Journal
BMC urology
ISSN: 1471-2490
Titre abrégé: BMC Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Apr 2021
09 Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
11
08
2020
accepted:
29
03
2021
entrez:
10
4
2021
pubmed:
11
4
2021
medline:
18
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Long-term use of urethral catheters is associated with high risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and blockage. Microbial biofilms are a common cause of catheter blockage, reducing their lifetime and significantly increasing morbidity of UTIs. A 0.02% polyhexanide irrigation solution developed for routine mechanical rinsing shows potential for bacterial decolonization of urethral catheters and has the potential to reduce or prevent biofilm formation. Using an in vitro assay with standard market-leading types of catheters artificially contaminated with clinically relevant bacteria, assays were carried out to evaluate the biofilm reduction and prevention potential of a 0.02% polyhexanide solution versus no intervention (standard approach) and irrigation with saline solution (NaCl 0.9%). The efficiency of decolonization was measured through microbial plate count and membrane filtration. Irrigation using a 0.02% polyhexanide solution is suitable for the decolonization of a variety of transurethral catheters. The effect observed is significant compared to irrigation with 0.9% saline solution (p = 0.002) or no treatment (p = 0.011). No significant difference was found between irrigation with 0.9% saline solution and no treatment (p = 0.74). A 0.02% polyhexanide solution is able to reduce bacterial biofilm from catheters artificially contaminated with clinically relevant bacteria in vitro. The data shows a reduction of the viability of thick bacterial biofilms in a variety of commercially available urinary catheters made from silicone, latex-free silicone, hydrogel-coated silicone and PVC. Further research is required to evaluate the long-term tolerability and efficacy of polyhexanide in clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Long-term use of urethral catheters is associated with high risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and blockage. Microbial biofilms are a common cause of catheter blockage, reducing their lifetime and significantly increasing morbidity of UTIs. A 0.02% polyhexanide irrigation solution developed for routine mechanical rinsing shows potential for bacterial decolonization of urethral catheters and has the potential to reduce or prevent biofilm formation.
METHODS
METHODS
Using an in vitro assay with standard market-leading types of catheters artificially contaminated with clinically relevant bacteria, assays were carried out to evaluate the biofilm reduction and prevention potential of a 0.02% polyhexanide solution versus no intervention (standard approach) and irrigation with saline solution (NaCl 0.9%). The efficiency of decolonization was measured through microbial plate count and membrane filtration.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Irrigation using a 0.02% polyhexanide solution is suitable for the decolonization of a variety of transurethral catheters. The effect observed is significant compared to irrigation with 0.9% saline solution (p = 0.002) or no treatment (p = 0.011). No significant difference was found between irrigation with 0.9% saline solution and no treatment (p = 0.74).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A 0.02% polyhexanide solution is able to reduce bacterial biofilm from catheters artificially contaminated with clinically relevant bacteria in vitro. The data shows a reduction of the viability of thick bacterial biofilms in a variety of commercially available urinary catheters made from silicone, latex-free silicone, hydrogel-coated silicone and PVC. Further research is required to evaluate the long-term tolerability and efficacy of polyhexanide in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33836738
doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00826-3
pii: 10.1186/s12894-021-00826-3
pmc: PMC8034122
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biguanides
0
Disinfectants
0
polihexanide
322U039GMF
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
58Références
BMC Urol. 2018 May 24;18(1):49
pubmed: 29793457
Biomaterials. 1996 Aug;17(15):1541-6
pubmed: 8853126
World J Urol. 2012 Feb;30(1):51-7
pubmed: 21590469
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;17(2):411-32
pubmed: 12848477
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Feb;77(2):113-7
pubmed: 21194789
J Vasc Access. 2020 Jun 22;:1129729820932423
pubmed: 32564705
Am J Infect Control. 2004 May;32(3):177-83
pubmed: 15153930
J Hosp Infect. 1993 Jul;24(3):211-8
pubmed: 8104211
World J Urol. 1999 Dec;17(6):345-50
pubmed: 10654364
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;26(1):173-86
pubmed: 22284383
J Infect Public Health. 2019 Nov - Dec;12(6):760-766
pubmed: 31628048
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jun;10(6):PC01-3
pubmed: 27504341
Nat Rev Urol. 2012 Apr 17;9(6):305-14
pubmed: 22508462
Med Devices (Auckl). 2018 Dec 19;11:427-432
pubmed: 30588133
Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008 Nov;5(11):598-608
pubmed: 18852707
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Dec;28(12):1121-6
pubmed: 11737509
Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2010;23 Suppl:17-27
pubmed: 20829658
Urol Res. 1982 Feb;10(1):37-40
pubmed: 7041394
World J Urol. 2006 Feb;24(1):13-20
pubmed: 16402262
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Oct;24(4):559-61
pubmed: 3771745
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Jun;61(6):1281-7
pubmed: 18364400
J Med Microbiol. 1991 Jun;34(6):349-53
pubmed: 1905357
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Oct;54(4):772-9
pubmed: 15355938
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016 Dec;104(12):2954-2967
pubmed: 27448986
BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):92
pubmed: 32641131
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Dec;75(6):1221-1228.e4
pubmed: 27692497
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 May;133(21):1111-5
pubmed: 18478503
World J Urol. 2013 Jun;31(3):565-71
pubmed: 22926265