Predictors of death at home among cancer patients in Israel: a population-based study.


Journal

International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 04 2021
Historique:
received: 25 09 2020
accepted: 30 03 2021
entrez: 11 4 2021
pubmed: 12 4 2021
medline: 14 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Most cancer patients prefer to die at home; however, many die in hospital. The aim of the current study is to elucidate the association between dying at home and various personal factors in the Israeli population of cancer patients. Data on cancer incidence (2008-2015) and death (2008-2017) was provided by the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics and the Israel National Cancer Registry. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to assess odds ratios for death at home following cancer diagnosis while controlling for age, sex, ethnicity, years of education, residential socioeconomic score, and time from diagnosis. We also assessed the relation between place of death and specific cancer sites, as well as the time trend from 2008 to 2017. About one quarter (26.7%) of the study population died at home. Death at home was most frequent among patients diagnosed with brain tumors (37.0%), while it was the lowest among patients with hematologic malignancies (lymphoma and leukemia, 20.3 and 20.0%, respectively). Rates of dying at home among patients with residential socioeconomic scores of 1, 2-9, and 10 were about 15, 30, and 42.9%, respectively. In patients from the 4th to the 7th decades of life, rates of death at home increased at a linear rate that increased exponentially from the 8th decade onwards. After controlling for potential confounders, predictive variables for death at home included age (OR = 1.020 per year, 95% CI 1.017-1.024), male sex (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.077-1.294), years of education (OR = 1.029 per year, 95% CI 1.018-1.040), and time from diagnosis (OR = 1.003 per month, 95% CI 1.001-1.005 all p < 0.001). No trend was seen from 2008 to 2013, while from 2014 to 2017 a slight increase in the rate of death at home was seen each year. These results indicate wide variability in death at home exists among patients of different ages, sex, education, socioeconomic status and time from diagnosis. These findings stress the importance of delivering quality palliative care at home, mainly for patients with hematologic malignancies, younger patients, and patients of very low socioeconomic status. Understanding the complex mechanisms whereby patient preferences and the above variables may determine the preferred place of death remains an important research priority.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Most cancer patients prefer to die at home; however, many die in hospital. The aim of the current study is to elucidate the association between dying at home and various personal factors in the Israeli population of cancer patients.
METHODS
Data on cancer incidence (2008-2015) and death (2008-2017) was provided by the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics and the Israel National Cancer Registry. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to assess odds ratios for death at home following cancer diagnosis while controlling for age, sex, ethnicity, years of education, residential socioeconomic score, and time from diagnosis. We also assessed the relation between place of death and specific cancer sites, as well as the time trend from 2008 to 2017.
RESULTS
About one quarter (26.7%) of the study population died at home. Death at home was most frequent among patients diagnosed with brain tumors (37.0%), while it was the lowest among patients with hematologic malignancies (lymphoma and leukemia, 20.3 and 20.0%, respectively). Rates of dying at home among patients with residential socioeconomic scores of 1, 2-9, and 10 were about 15, 30, and 42.9%, respectively. In patients from the 4th to the 7th decades of life, rates of death at home increased at a linear rate that increased exponentially from the 8th decade onwards. After controlling for potential confounders, predictive variables for death at home included age (OR = 1.020 per year, 95% CI 1.017-1.024), male sex (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.077-1.294), years of education (OR = 1.029 per year, 95% CI 1.018-1.040), and time from diagnosis (OR = 1.003 per month, 95% CI 1.001-1.005 all p < 0.001). No trend was seen from 2008 to 2013, while from 2014 to 2017 a slight increase in the rate of death at home was seen each year.
CONCLUSIONS
These results indicate wide variability in death at home exists among patients of different ages, sex, education, socioeconomic status and time from diagnosis. These findings stress the importance of delivering quality palliative care at home, mainly for patients with hematologic malignancies, younger patients, and patients of very low socioeconomic status. Understanding the complex mechanisms whereby patient preferences and the above variables may determine the preferred place of death remains an important research priority.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33838680
doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01437-y
pii: 10.1186/s12939-021-01437-y
pmc: PMC8037835
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

99

Références

Brain Sci. 2018 Jun 30;8(7):
pubmed: 29966347
Palliat Med. 2016 Sep;30(8):764-71
pubmed: 26857358
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):923-932
pubmed: 30708125
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug;69(685):e561-e569
pubmed: 31208973
Aging Ment Health. 2018 May;22(5):639-645
pubmed: 28282731
J Palliat Med. 2000 Fall;3(3):287-300
pubmed: 15859670
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019 Nov 12;8(1):79
pubmed: 31718701
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Sep;32(3):549-555
pubmed: 26801509
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;3(10):1403-1406
pubmed: 28384683
BMJ. 2006 Mar 4;332(7540):515-21
pubmed: 16467346
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jun 20;17(1):87
pubmed: 29925364
J Palliat Care. 2020 Jul;35(3):167-173
pubmed: 31204570
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2018 Feb;20(1):36-44
pubmed: 30063612
Health Syst Transit. 2015;17(6):1-212
pubmed: 27050102
Gac Sanit. 2019 Nov - Dec;33(6):568-574
pubmed: 30390994
Ann Saudi Med. 2010 May-Jun;30(3):215-21
pubmed: 20427938
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Nov;10(6):e396-403
pubmed: 25294393
N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 19;361(21):e46
pubmed: 19890109
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 25;376(21):2082-2088
pubmed: 28538128
Br J Cancer. 2015 Nov 3;113(9):1397-404
pubmed: 26325102
Palliat Med. 2019 Jul;33(7):802-811
pubmed: 31046580
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2001 Jul-Aug;18(4):251-5
pubmed: 11467099
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 18;14(4):e0215566
pubmed: 30998764
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010 Apr;10(2):154-60
pubmed: 20446929

Auteurs

Yakir Rottenberg (Y)

Department of Oncology, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. ryakir@hadassah.org.il.

Gil Goldzweig (G)

School of Behavioral Sciences, The Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yafo, Rabenu Yeruham St, 86162, Yaffo, Israel.

Adir Shaulov (A)

Department of Hematology, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH