Appropriate responses to potential child abuse: The importance of information quality.

Child welfare Decision Making Health/allied health Potential child abuse Reporting Training

Journal

Child abuse & neglect
ISSN: 1873-7757
Titre abrégé: Child Abuse Negl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7801702

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2021
Historique:
received: 13 10 2020
revised: 16 02 2021
accepted: 30 03 2021
pubmed: 12 4 2021
medline: 25 11 2021
entrez: 11 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

When people suspect a child or young person is experiencing, or at risk of, abuse or neglect, they have to decide how to respond. However, the under and over reporting of child welfare issues indicate that people may struggle to identify an appropriate response. To develop scenarios (for future training and research purposes) that closely resemble the child welfare situations health/allied health practitioners encounter, and for which there is a reasonable level of child protection professional consensus as to what the appropriate response for each situation should be. We developed 285 scenarios from 190 child protection reports made by health/allied health practitioners to two Australian government child welfare agencies, that covered a range of appropriate response pathways and abuse types. An appropriate response pathway for each scenario was identified by having 34 child protection professionals provide their opinion and rationales. Child protection professionals displayed moderate (e.g., krippendorf's alpha = 0.58, 95 % CI: 0.52 to 0.62) interrater agreement as to the appropriate response pathway for the scenarios. For 127 of the 285 scenarios (44.56 %), there was strong consensus (K = 0.73, 95 % CI: 0.66 to 0.78). Professional consensus was higher than anticipated from previous research, although still low compared to generally acceptable levels of consensus. Our results suggest several promising avenues to increase professional consensus, such as improving the quality of information that people typically report to child welfare agencies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
When people suspect a child or young person is experiencing, or at risk of, abuse or neglect, they have to decide how to respond. However, the under and over reporting of child welfare issues indicate that people may struggle to identify an appropriate response.
OBJECTIVE
To develop scenarios (for future training and research purposes) that closely resemble the child welfare situations health/allied health practitioners encounter, and for which there is a reasonable level of child protection professional consensus as to what the appropriate response for each situation should be.
PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, AND METHODS
We developed 285 scenarios from 190 child protection reports made by health/allied health practitioners to two Australian government child welfare agencies, that covered a range of appropriate response pathways and abuse types. An appropriate response pathway for each scenario was identified by having 34 child protection professionals provide their opinion and rationales.
RESULTS
Child protection professionals displayed moderate (e.g., krippendorf's alpha = 0.58, 95 % CI: 0.52 to 0.62) interrater agreement as to the appropriate response pathway for the scenarios. For 127 of the 285 scenarios (44.56 %), there was strong consensus (K = 0.73, 95 % CI: 0.66 to 0.78).
CONCLUSION
Professional consensus was higher than anticipated from previous research, although still low compared to generally acceptable levels of consensus. Our results suggest several promising avenues to increase professional consensus, such as improving the quality of information that people typically report to child welfare agencies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33839498
pii: S0145-2134(21)00135-6
doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105062
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105062

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Annalese Bolton (A)

UNSW Forensic Psychology Clinic, UNSW, Sydney, Australia; Matilda Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: a.bolton@unsw.edu.au.

Simon Gandevia (S)

Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, Australia; School of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.

Ben R Newell (BR)

School of Psychology, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH