Survey of Anesthesiologists on Topical Vasoconstrictors and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.
Administration, Intravenous
Administration, Topical
Anesthesiology
Antifibrinolytic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Cocaine
/ administration & dosage
Endoscopy
Epinephrine
/ administration & dosage
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Oxymetazoline
/ administration & dosage
Paranasal Sinuses
/ surgery
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Tranexamic Acid
/ administration & dosage
Vasoconstrictor Agents
/ administration & dosage
education
endoscopic sinus surgery
intravenous tranexamic acid
surgical field visibility
topical cocaine
topical epinephrine
topical oxymetazoline
Journal
The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology
ISSN: 1943-572X
Titre abrégé: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0407300
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
13
4
2021
medline:
7
1
2022
entrez:
12
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Topical vasoconstrictors and intravenous tranexamic acid (IV TXA) are safe and efficacious to decrease bleeding and improve the surgical field during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The purpose of this study was to investigate practice patterns, awareness of clinical evidence, and comfort levels among anesthesia providers regarding these hemostatic agents for ESS. A total of 767 attending anesthesiologists, residents, and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) at 5 United States academic centers were invited to participate in a survey regarding their experience with IV TXA and 3 topical vasoconstrictor medications (oxymetazoline, epinephrine, and cocaine) during ESS. 330 (47%) anesthesia providers responded to the electronic survey. 113 (97%) residents, 92 (83%) CRNAs, and 52 (68%) attendings managed 5 or fewer ESS cases per month. Two-thirds of providers had not reviewed efficacy or safety literature for these hemostatic agents. Oxymetazoline was perceived safest, followed by epinephrine, IV TXA, and cocaine. Respondents considered potential side effects over surgical field visibility when selecting agents. The majority of providers had no formal training on these agents for ESS, but indicated interest in educational opportunities. Many anesthesia providers are unfamiliar with safety and efficacy literature regarding agents used to improve hemostasis for ESS, highlighting a need for development of relevant educational resources. Rhinologic surgeons have an opportunity to communicate with anesthesia colleagues on the use of hemostatic agents to improve the surgical field during ESS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33840220
doi: 10.1177/00034894211005940
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antifibrinolytic Agents
0
Vasoconstrictor Agents
0
Tranexamic Acid
6T84R30KC1
Oxymetazoline
8VLN5B44ZY
Cocaine
I5Y540LHVR
Epinephrine
YKH834O4BH
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM