An Automated Correction Algorithm (ALPACA) for ddPCR Data Using Adaptive Limit of Blank and Correction of False Positive Events Improves Specificity of Mutation Detection.


Journal

Clinical chemistry
ISSN: 1530-8561
Titre abrégé: Clin Chem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9421549

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 07 2021
Historique:
received: 05 11 2020
accepted: 17 02 2021
pubmed: 13 4 2021
medline: 7 4 2022
entrez: 12 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Bio-Rad droplet-digital PCR is a highly sensitive method that can be used to detect tumor mutations in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of patients with cancer. Correct interpretation of ddPCR results is important for optimal sensitivity and specificity. Despite its widespread use, no standardized method to interpret ddPCR data is available, nor have technical artifacts affecting ddPCR results been widely studied. False positive rates were determined for 6 ddPCR assays at variable amounts of input DNA, revealing polymerase induced false positive events (PIFs) and other false positives. An in silico correction algorithm, known as the adaptive LoB and PIFs: an automated correction algorithm (ALPACA), was developed to remove PIFs and apply an adaptive limit of blank (LoB) to individual samples. Performance of ALPACA was compared to a standard strategy (no PIF correction and static LoB = 3) using data from commercial reference DNA, healthy volunteer cfDNA, and cfDNA from a real-life cohort of 209 patients with stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumor and cfDNA had been molecularly profiled. Applying ALPACA reduced false positive results in healthy cfDNA compared to the standard strategy (specificity 98 vs 88%, P = 10-5) and stage IV NSCLC patient cfDNA (99 vs 93%, P = 10-11), while not affecting sensitivity in commercial reference DNA (70 vs 68% P = 0.77) or patient cfDNA (82 vs 88%, P = 0.13). Overall accuracy in patient samples was improved (98 vs 92%, P = 10-7). Correction of PIFs and application of an adaptive LoB increases specificity without a loss of sensitivity in ddPCR, leading to a higher accuracy in a real-life cohort of patients with stage IV NSCLC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Bio-Rad droplet-digital PCR is a highly sensitive method that can be used to detect tumor mutations in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of patients with cancer. Correct interpretation of ddPCR results is important for optimal sensitivity and specificity. Despite its widespread use, no standardized method to interpret ddPCR data is available, nor have technical artifacts affecting ddPCR results been widely studied.
METHODS
False positive rates were determined for 6 ddPCR assays at variable amounts of input DNA, revealing polymerase induced false positive events (PIFs) and other false positives. An in silico correction algorithm, known as the adaptive LoB and PIFs: an automated correction algorithm (ALPACA), was developed to remove PIFs and apply an adaptive limit of blank (LoB) to individual samples. Performance of ALPACA was compared to a standard strategy (no PIF correction and static LoB = 3) using data from commercial reference DNA, healthy volunteer cfDNA, and cfDNA from a real-life cohort of 209 patients with stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumor and cfDNA had been molecularly profiled.
RESULTS
Applying ALPACA reduced false positive results in healthy cfDNA compared to the standard strategy (specificity 98 vs 88%, P = 10-5) and stage IV NSCLC patient cfDNA (99 vs 93%, P = 10-11), while not affecting sensitivity in commercial reference DNA (70 vs 68% P = 0.77) or patient cfDNA (82 vs 88%, P = 0.13). Overall accuracy in patient samples was improved (98 vs 92%, P = 10-7).
CONCLUSIONS
Correction of PIFs and application of an adaptive LoB increases specificity without a loss of sensitivity in ddPCR, leading to a higher accuracy in a real-life cohort of patients with stage IV NSCLC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33842952
pii: 6220435
doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab040
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cell-Free Nucleic Acids 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

959-967

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2021.

Auteurs

Daan C L Vessies (DCL)

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Theodora C Linders (TC)

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Mirthe Lanfermeijer (M)

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Kalpana L Ramkisoensing (KL)

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Vincent van der Noort (V)

Biometrics Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Robert D Schouten (RD)

Department of Pulmonology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Gerrit A Meijer (GA)

Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Michel M van den Heuvel (MM)

Department of Pulmonology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Kim Monkhorst (K)

Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Daan van den Broek (D)

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH