Mechanical and Ablative Minimally Invasive Techniques for Male LUTS due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Systematic Review according to BPH-6 Evaluation.
Ablation Techniques
/ adverse effects
Humans
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
/ diagnosis
Male
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Prostatic Hyperplasia
/ diagnosis
Recovery of Function
Treatment Outcome
Urodynamics
Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male
/ adverse effects
Aquabeam system
Aquablation system
Convective water vapor energy ablation
Prostatic urethral lift
Rezūm system
Robot-assisted aquablation therapy of the prostate
Temporary implantable nitinol device
Urolitf
Journal
Urologia internationalis
ISSN: 1423-0399
Titre abrégé: Urol Int
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0417373
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
26
11
2020
accepted:
22
12
2020
pubmed:
14
4
2021
medline:
19
1
2022
entrez:
13
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction represents one of the major interesting aspects in urological clinical practice. Although transurethral resection of the prostate is still considered the surgical gold standard for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostate volume <80 mL, various minimally invasive surgical treatments (MITs) have been developed to overcome the limitations of the "conventional" surgery. To date, there are no validated tools to evaluate the surgical outcomes of MITs; however, in the past, BPH-6 has been used for this purpose. In this systematic review, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of MITs according to BPH-6 score system. We focused our attention on MITs based on mechanical devices (prostatic urethral lift and the temporary implantable nitinol device) and techniques for prostate ablation (image guided robotic waterjet ablation and convective water vapor energy ablation). Evidence shows that MITs are capable of leading to an improvement in LUTS without having an overwhelming impact on complications and are a valid alternative to other treatments in patients who wish to preserve their sexual function or in case of inapplicability of conventional surgery. However, comparative studies between these techniques are still missing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33849045
pii: 000514438
doi: 10.1159/000514438
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
858-868Informations de copyright
© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.