Comparison of spirometry and impulse oscillometry in methacholine challenge test for the detection of airway hyperresponsiveness in adults.
Yetişkinlerde hava yolu aşırı duyarlılığının tespiti için metakolin provokasyon testinde spirometri ve impuls osilometrinin karşılaştırılması.
Adult
Airway Obstruction
/ diagnosis
Airway Resistance
Asthma
/ diagnosis
Bronchial Provocation Tests
/ methods
Female
Forced Expiratory Volume
Humans
Male
Methacholine Chloride
/ administration & dosage
Oscillometry
/ methods
ROC Curve
Respiratory Function Tests
/ methods
Respiratory Hypersensitivity
/ diagnosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Spirometry
/ methods
Journal
Tuberkuloz ve toraks
ISSN: 0494-1373
Titre abrégé: Tuberk Toraks
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 0417364
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
entrez:
15
4
2021
pubmed:
16
4
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) is a characteristic feature of asthma. The aim of this study was to compare the impulse oscillometry (IOS) and spirometry to methacholine for AHR detection among individuals with clinically hyper-reactive airway disease suggestive of bronchial asthma and baseline spirometry were normal. Adults with symptoms suggestive of AHR and normal baseline spirometry test were selected. The short protocol of methacholine challenge test (MCT) was performed for all subjects using IOS and spirometry simultaneously. The primary endpoint was to compare the methacholine dosage causing a 20% drop in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), with methacholine dosage that causing 40% increasing the baseline respiratory resistance at 5 hertz (R5), as measured by IOS. A total of 235 participants were analyzed, 184 (78.2%) had positive test results with R5, while 81 (34.4%) had positive MCT results with FEV1.The sensitivity and specificity of MCT with R5were 87.3%, 64.6%, and MCT with FEV1 were 39.1%, 85.4%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was greater at lower doses of MCT at R5, (AUROC: 0.653; p= 0.01). The results showed higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and earlier response of the short protocol of MCT with IOS, compared to MCT with spirometry. Our study suggested the utility of IOS in addition to conventional spirometry as a method of choice in MCT for detection of AHR.
Substances chimiques
Methacholine Chloride
0W5ETF9M2K
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM