Estimation of overdiagnosis in colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood testing: comparison of simulation models.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 04 2021
Historique:
entrez: 15 4 2021
pubmed: 16 4 2021
medline: 21 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To estimate overdiagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) for screening with sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood testing (FOBT). Simulation study using data from randomised trials. Primary screening, UK, Norway PARTICIPANTS: 152 850 individuals from the Nottingham trial and 98 678 individuals from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) trial. CRC screening. We estimated overdiagnosis using long-term data from two randomised trials: the Nottingham trial comparing FOBT screening every other year to no-screening, and the NORCCAP trial comparing once-only sigmoidoscopy screening to no-screening. To estimate the natural growth of adenomas to CRC, we used the following microsimulation models: (i) the Microsimulation Screening Analysis; (ii) the CRC Simulated Population model for Incidence and Natural history; (iii) the Simulation Model of Colorectal Cancer; (iv) a model derived by the German Cancer Research Center. We defined overdiagnosed cancers as the difference between the observed number of CRCs in the no-screening arm and the expected number of cancers in screening arm (sum of observed and prevented by adenoma removal). The amount of overdiagnosis is defined as the number of overdiagnosed cancers over the number of cancers observed in the no-screening arm. Overdiagnosis estimates were highly dependent on model assumptions. For FOBT screening with 2354 cancers observed in control arm, four out of five models predicted overdiagnosis, range 2.0% (2400 cancers expected in screening) to 7.6% (2533 cancers expected in screening). For sigmoidoscopy screening with 452 cancers observed in control arm, all models predicted overdiagnosis, range 25.2% (566 cancers expected in screening) to 128.1% (1031 cancers expected in screening). The amount of overdiagnosis estimated based on the microsimulation models varied substantially. Microsimulation models may not give reliable estimates of the preventive effect of adenoma removal, and should be used with caution to inform guidelines.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33853794
pii: bmjopen-2020-042158
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042158
pmc: PMC8054108
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e042158

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

JAMA. 2014 Aug 13;312(6):606-15
pubmed: 25117129
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 5;102(9):605-13
pubmed: 20413742
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;36(1):e54-60
pubmed: 22075536
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):250-281
pubmed: 29846947
J Med Screen. 2016 Jun;23(2):111-3
pubmed: 26462725
J Med Screen. 2016 Dec;23(4):210-216
pubmed: 27068430
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):875-883.e5
pubmed: 31563625
Gut. 2012 Jul;61(7):1036-40
pubmed: 22052062
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575
pubmed: 27304597
Med Decis Making. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):530-9
pubmed: 21673186
Lancet. 1996 Nov 30;348(9040):1472-7
pubmed: 8942775
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr;13(4):717-23
pubmed: 25218160
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Aug;19(8):1992-2002
pubmed: 20647403
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Jun;22(6):1043-51
pubmed: 23632815
BMJ. 2015 Jan 07;350:g7773
pubmed: 25569206
Lancet. 2017 Apr 1;389(10076):1299-1311
pubmed: 28236467
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jun 5;168(11):775-782
pubmed: 29710125
Gastroenterology. 2018 Sep;155(3):592-595
pubmed: 30076834
Cancer. 2018 Jul 15;124(14):2964-2973
pubmed: 29846933
Int J Cancer. 2004 Sep 10;111(4):633-9
pubmed: 15239144

Auteurs

Paulina Wieszczy (P)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.

Michal F Kaminski (MF)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.

Magnus Løberg (M)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Marek Bugajski (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.

Michael Bretthauer (M)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Mette Kalager (M)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway mkalager@hsph.harvard.edu.
Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH