Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a pan-cancer screening test: is it finally on the horizon?


Journal

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
ISSN: 1437-4331
Titre abrégé: Clin Chem Lab Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9806306

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 07 2021
Historique:
received: 05 02 2021
accepted: 29 03 2021
pubmed: 16 4 2021
medline: 15 2 2022
entrez: 15 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The detection of cancer at an early stage while it is curable by surgical resection is widely believed to be one of the most effective strategies for reducing cancer mortality. Hence, the intense interests in the development of a simple pan-cancer screening test. Lack of sensitivity and specificity when combined with the low prevalence of most types of cancer types in the general population limit the use of most of the existing protein biomarkers for this purpose. Like proteins, tumor DNA also can be released into the circulation. Such circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be differentiated from normal cell DNA by the presence of specific genetic alteration such as mutations, copy number changes, altered methylation patterns or being present in different sized fragments. Emerging results with test such as CancerSEEK or GRAIL suggest that the use of ctDNA can detect cancer with specificities >99%. Sensitivity however, is cancer type and stage-dependent, varying from approximately 40% in stage I disease to approximately 80% in stage III disease. It is important to stress however, that most of the studies published to date have used patients with an established diagnosis of cancer while the control population were healthy individuals. Although the emerging results are promising, evidence of clinical utility will require demonstration of reduced mortality following evaluation in a prospective randomized screening trial.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33856748
pii: cclm-2021-0171
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0171
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Circulating Tumor DNA 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1353-1361

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.

Références

Cho, H, Mariotto, AB, Schwartz, LM, Luo, J, Woloshin, S. When do changes in cancer survival mean progress? The insight from population incidence and mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2014;49:187–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu014.
Clarke, CA, Hubbell, E, Kurian, AW, Colditz, GA, Hartman, AR, Gomez, SL. Projected reductions in absolute cancer-related deaths from diagnosing cancers before metastasis, 2006–2015. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29:895–902. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-1366.
Aravanis, AM, Lee, M, Klausner, RD. Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA for early cancer detection. Cell 2017;168:571–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.030.
Barratt, A, Mannes, P, Irwig, L, Trevena, L, Craig, J, Rychetnik, L. Cancer screening. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:899–902. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.12.899.
Schröder, FH, Hugosson, J, Roobol, MJ, Tammela, TL, Zappa, M, Nelen, V, et al.. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet 2014;384:2027–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60525-0.
Buys, SS, Partridge, E, Black, A, Johnson, CC, Lamerato, L, Isaacs, C, et al.. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2011;305:2295–303. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.766.
Pashayan, N, Pharoah, PDP. The challenge of early detection in cancer. Science 2020;368:589–90. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz2078.
Glasziou, PP, Bell, KJ, Barratt, AL. Estimating the magnitude of cancer overdiagnosis in Australia. Med J Aust 2020;213:189–189.e1. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50578.
Heitzer, E, Haque, IS, Roberts, CES, Speicher, MR. Current and future perspectives of liquid biopsies in genomics-driven oncology. Nat Rev Genet 2019;20:71–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0071-5.
Phallen, J, Sausen, M, Adleff, V, Leal, A, Hruban, C, White, J, et al.. Direct detection of early-stage cancers using circulating tumor DNA. Sci Transl Med 2017;9:eaan2415. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aan2415.
Cohen, JD, Li, L, Wang, Y, Thoburn, C, Afsari, B, Danilova, L, et al.. Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test. Science 2018;359:926–30. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar3247.
Douville, C, Cohen, JD, Ptak, J, Popoli, M, Schaefer, J, Silliman, N, et al.. Assessing aneuploidy with repetitive element sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020;117:4858–63. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910041117.
Lennon, AM, Buchanan, AH, Kinde, I, Warren, A, Honushefsky, A, Cohain, AT, et al.. Feasibility of blood testing combined with PET-CT to screen for cancer and guide intervention. Science 2020;369:eabb9601. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb9601.
Baylin, SB, Jones, PA. Epigenetic determinants of cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2016;8:a019505. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a019505.
Feinberg, AP. The key role of epigenetics in human disease prevention and mitigation. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1323–34. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1402513.
Leal, A, Sidransky, D, Brait, M. Tissue and cell-free DNA-based epigenomic approaches for cancer detection. Clin Chem 2020;66:105–16. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2019.303594.
Lehmann-Werman, R, Neiman, D, Zemmour, H, Moss, J, Magenheim, J, Vaknin-Dembinsky, A, et al.. Identification of tissue-specific cell death using methylation patterns of circulating DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113:E1826–34. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519286113.
Guo, S, Diep, D, Plongthongkum, N, Fung, HL, Zhang, K, Zhang, K. Identification of methylation haplotype blocks aids in deconvolution of heterogeneous tissue samples and tumor tissue-of-origin mapping from plasma DNA. Nat Genet 2017;49:635–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3805.
Fernandez, AF, Assenov, Y, Martin-Subero, JI, Balint, B, Siebert, R, Taniguchi, H, et al.. A DNA methylation fingerprint of 1628 human samples. Genome Res 2012;22:407–19. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.119867.110.
Liu, MC, Oxnard, GR, Klein, EA, Swanton, C, Seiden, MV, CCGA Consortium. Sensitive and specific multi-cancer detection and localization using methylation signatures in cell-free DNA. Ann Oncol 2020;31:745–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.008.
Chen, X, Gole, J, Gore, A, He, Q, Lu, M, Min, J, et al.. Non-invasive early detection of cancer four years before conventional diagnosis using a blood test. Nat Commun 2020;11:3475. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17316-z.
Shen, SY, Burgener, JM, Bratman, SV, De Carvalho, DD. Preparation of cfMeDIP-seq libraries for methylome profiling of plasma cell-free DNA. Nat Protoc 2019;14:2749–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0202-2.
Nuzzo, PV, Berchuck, JE, Korthauer, K, Spisak, S, Nassar, AH, Abou Alaiwi, S, et al.. Detection of renal cell carcinoma using plasma and urine cell-free DNA methylomes. Nat Med 2020;26:1041–3. Erratum in: Nat Med. 2020;26:1663. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0933-1.
Nassiri, F, Chakravarthy, A, Feng, S, Shen, SY, Nejad, R, Zuccato, JA, et al.. Detection and discrimination of intracranial tumors using plasma cell-free DNA methylomes. Nat Med 2020;26:1044–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0932-2.
Mouliere, F, Chandrananda, D, Piskorz, AM, Moore, EK, Morris, J, Ahlborn, LB, et al.. Enhanced detection of circulating tumor DNA by fragment size analysis. Sci Transl Med 2018;10:eaat4921. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aat4921.
Liu, X, Lang, J, Li, S, Wang, Y, Peng, L, Wang, W, et al.. Fragment enrichment of circulating tumor DNA with low-frequency mutations. Front Genet 2020;11:147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00147.
Cristiano, S, Leal, A, Phallen, J, Fiksel, J, Adleff, V, Bruhm, DC, et al.. Genome-wide cell-free DNA fragmentation in patients with cancer. Nature 2019;570:385–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1272-6.
Chan, HT, Chin, YM, Nakamura, Y, Low, SK. Clonal hematopoiesis in liquid biopsy: from biological noise to valuable clinical implications. Cancers (Basel) 2020;14:2277. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082277.
Fiala, C, Diamandis, EP. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is not a good proxy for liquid biopsies of tumor tissues for early detection. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1651–3. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0083.
Bauml, J, Levy, B. Clonal hematopoiesis: a new layer in the liquid biopsy story in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:4352–4. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0969.
Razavi, P, Li, BT, Brown, DN, Jung, B, Hubbell, E, Shen, R, et al.. High-intensity sequencing reveals the sources of plasma circulating cell-free DNA variants. Nat Med 2019;25:1928–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0652-7.
Chabon, JJ, Hamilton, EG, Kurtz, DM, Esfahani, MS, Moding, EJ, Stehr, H, et al.. Integrating genomic features for non-invasive early lung cancer detection. Nature 2020;580:245–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2140-0.
Keller, L, Belloum, Y, Wikman, H, Pantel, K. Clinical relevance of blood-based ctDNA analysis: mutation detection and beyond. Br J Cancer 2021;124:345–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01047-5.
Yizhak, K, Aguet, F, Kim, J, Hess, JM, Kübler, K, Grimsby, J, et al.. RNA sequence analysis reveals macroscopic somatic clonal expansion across normal tissues. Science 2019;364:eaaw0726. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw0726.
Fiala, C, Diamandis, EP. Mutations in normal tissues-some diagnostic and clinical implications. BMC Med 2020;18:283. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01763-y.
Kirk, GD, Lesi, OA, Mendy, M, Szymañska, K, Whittle, H, Goedert, JJ, et al.. 249(ser) TP53 mutation in plasma DNA, hepatitis B viral infection, and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 2005;24:5858–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208732.
Gormally, E, Vineis, P, Matullo, G, Veglia, F, Caboux, E, Le Roux, E, et al.. TP53 and KRAS2 mutations in plasma DNA of healthy subjects and subsequent cancer occurrence: a prospective study. Cancer Res 2006;66:6871–6. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-4556.
Zill, OA, Banks, KC, Fairclough, SR, Mortimer, SA, Vowles, JV, Mokhtari, R, et al.. The landscape of actionable genomic alterations in cell-free circulating tumor DNA from 21,807 advanced cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:3528–38. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-3837.
Ferraro, S, Braga, F, Lanzoni, M, Boracchi, P, Biganzoli, EM, Panteghini, M. Serum human epididymis protein 4 vs carbohydrate antigen 125 for ovarian cancer diagnosis: a systematic review. J Clin Pathol 2013;66:273–81. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201031.
Hasan, S, Jacob, R, Manne, U, Paluri, R. Advances in pancreatic cancer biomarkers. Oncol Rev 2019;13:410. https://doi.org/10.4081/oncol.2019.410.
Fiala, C, Diamandis, EP. New approaches for detecting cancer with circulating cell-free DNA. BMC Med 2019;17:159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1400-z.
Fiala, C, Diamandis, EP. Can a broad molecular screen based on circulating tumor DNA aid in early cancer detection?. J Appl Lab Med 2020;5:1372–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaa138.
Fiala, C, Diamandis, EP. A multi-cancer detection test: focus on the positive predictive value. Ann Oncol 2020;31:1267–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.05.028.
Fiala, C, Diamandis, EP. Can a broad molecular screen based on circulating tumor DNA aid in early cancer detection? J Appl Lab Med 2020;5:1372–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaa138.
Jacobs, I, Bast, RCJr. The CA 125 tumour-associated antigen: a review of the literature. Hum Reprod 1989;4:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136832.
Menon, U, Ryan, A, Kalsi, J, Gentry-Maharaj, A, Dawnay, A, Habib, M, et al.. Risk algorithm using serial biomarker measurements doubles the number of screen-detected cancers compared with a single-threshold rule in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:2062–71. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.59.4945.
Neal, RD, Tharmanathan, P, France, B, Din, NU, Cotton, S, Fallon-Ferguson, J, et al.. Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? systematic review. Br J Cancer 2015;112:S92–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.48.

Auteurs

Michael J Duffy (MJ)

UCD School of Medicine, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
UCD Clinical Research Centre, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Eleftherios P Diamandis (EP)

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

John Crown (J)

Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH